during hearing in Connecticut

2025In Connex Credit Union v. Thibodeau, 208 Conn. App. 861 , 872–74, 266 A.3d 930 (2021), appeal dismissed, 346 Conn. 708 , 295 A.3d 416 (2023), this court addressed similar circumstances in which a party raised a claim for the first time in a posttrial brief and concluded: ‘‘The court shall not be bound to consider a claim unless it was distinctly raised at the trial or arose subsequent to the trial. . . .

2025In Connex Credit Union v. Thibodeau, 208 Conn. App. 861 , 872–74, 266 A.3d 930 (2021), appeal dismissed, 346 Conn. 708 , 295 A.3d 416 (2023), this court addressed similar circumstances in which a party raised a claim for the first time in a posttrial brief and concluded: ‘‘The court shall not be bound to consider a claim unless it was distinctly raised at the trial or arose subsequent to the trial. . . .

2023Still angry, she threatened a lawsuit against him because he purportedly locked her and her two year old son out of the home after she failed to pay rent earlier that winter, claiming that he owed her three months of rent because of the lockout. 8 Although defense counsel did not object to the challenged remarks, ‘‘under settled law, a defendant who fails to preserve claims of prosecutorial [impropriety] need not seek to prevail under the specific requirements of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), and, similarly, it is unnecessary for a reviewing court to apply the

2023Still angry, she threatened a lawsuit against him because he purportedly locked her and her two year old son out of the home after she failed to pay rent earlier that winter, claiming that he owed her three months of rent because of the lockout. 8 Although defense counsel did not object to the challenged remarks, ‘‘under settled law, a defendant who fails to preserve claims of prosecutorial [impropriety] need not seek to prevail under the specific requirements of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), and, similarly, it is unnecessary for a reviewing court to apply the

2023Still angry, she threatened a lawsuit against him because he purportedly locked her and her two year old son out of the home after she failed to pay rent earlier that winter, claiming that he owed her three months of rent because of the lockout. 8 Although defense counsel did not object to the challenged remarks, ‘‘under settled law, a defendant who fails to preserve claims of prosecutorial [impropriety] need not seek to prevail under the specific requirements of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), and, similarly, it is unnecessary for a reviewing court to apply the

2022The plaintiff argues, in the alternative, that there is a logical nexus because ‘‘[t]he history of the area, the manner in which it was developed and main- tained, and the invitation [to] vulnerable people to be exposed to non-law- abiding people, created a foreseeable risk that people would be victimized.’’ Whether there is a ‘‘logical nexus by which to attribute any of the acts of the [third parties] to the defendant’’; Brown v. Branford, supra, 12 Conn. App. 113 ; is not a question of causation but one of whether the alleged acts of the defendant constitute a positive act—it asks whether th

2020Practice Book §§ 17-44 through 17-51.’’ We further note that Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Condron, supra, 181 Conn. App. 248 , was published after the trial court granted HCSB’s motion. 15 M&T’s position that it has consistently asserted that the notice of default was sent by first class mail is further undermined by HCSB’s representation to the court during the hearing on the motion for summary judgment.

2004Although we recognize that the task of determining judicial misconduct is difficult because we are “not given the benefit of witnessing the juxtaposition of personalities which may help prevent reading too much into the cold black and white of a printed record”; (internal quotation marks omitted) State v. Woodson, 227 Conn. 1, 31 , 629 A.2d 386 (1993); it is clear to us that, when viewed in the greater context of the entire penalty phase, the record reveals no improprieties on the part of the trial court during defense counsel’s direct examination of Ocasio and Santiago.

2004Although we recognize that the task of determining judicial misconduct is difficult because we are “not given the benefit of witnessing the juxtaposition of personalities which may help prevent reading too much into the cold black and white of a printed record”; (internal quotation marks omitted) State v. Woodson, 227 Conn. 1, 31 , 629 A.2d 386 (1993); it is clear to us that, when viewed in the greater context of the entire penalty phase, the record reveals no improprieties on the part of the trial court during defense counsel’s direct examination of Ocasio and Santiago.

1995Id., 696 .

1995Barker v. Hull, supra, 236 Cal.Rptr. 285 ; see also Lederer v. Rohrbasser, supra, 179 Cal.App.3d 290 ; Darlington v. Basalt Rock Co., supra, 188 Cal.App.2d 706 ; Rose v. Fuqua, supra, 19 Cal.Rptr. 634 .

1995Barker v. Hull, supra, 236 Cal.Rptr. 285 ; see also Lederer v. Rohrbasser, supra, 179 Cal.App.3d 290 ; Darlington v. Basalt Rock Co., supra, 188 Cal.App.2d 706 ; Rose v. Fuqua, supra, 19 Cal.Rptr. 634 .

1995Barker v. Hull, supra, 236 Cal.Rptr. 285 ; see also Lederer v. Rohrbasser, supra, 179 Cal.App.3d 290 ; Darlington v. Basalt Rock Co., supra, 188 Cal.App.2d 706 ; Rose v. Fuqua, supra, 19 Cal.Rptr. 634 .

1994He alerted the court during the hearing that police overreaching is necessary for the statement to be inadmissible under the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Colorado v. Connelly, supra, 479 U.S. 157 , but noted that the issue had not yet been squarely addressed under the Connecticut constitution. 17 While this claim may not have been articulated with clarity and specificity, we cannot conclude that the record before us fails to support that the defendant raised a state constitutional claim.

1993The defendant cites Cleland v. Cleland, 35 Conn. Sup. 215 as authority for her motion a 1979 Superior Court decision written when the Code of Professional Responsibility was in effect.