Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. Wingogreen1 sentence2022The court then adjourned the matter until January 13, 2014, for a plea or trial memo. 1 407 U.S. 514, 529-30 (1972). 2 At the time of his arrest, defendant was under indictment in both Essex and Morris Counties on multiple theft and burglary charges. 2 A-3659-20 Defendant failed to appear on that date. | 1 | 1 |
Kern v. Siemens Corp.green1 sentence2020See, e.g., In re Nexium Antitrust Litig., 777 F.3d 9, 19 (1st Cir. 2015) (noting that an individual claims process may be conducted at the liability and damages stage of class action litigation); Kern v. Siemens Corp., 393 F.3d 120, 127 (2d Cir. 45 2004) (“[O]nce defendant’s liability is established, the court may be justified in . . . requiring class members to file statements of their claims . . . .” (first omission in original) (quoting 7B Wright, Miller & Kane, Federal Practice & Procedure § 1787 at 217 (2d ed. 1986))); Kyriazi v. W. | 1 | 1 |
AstraZeneca AB v. United Food & Commercial Workers Unionsgreen1 sentence2020See, e.g., In re Nexium Antitrust Litig., 777 F.3d 9, 19 (1st Cir. 2015) (noting that an individual claims process may be conducted at the liability and damages stage of class action litigation); Kern v. Siemens Corp., 393 F.3d 120, 127 (2d Cir. 45 2004) (“[O]nce defendant’s liability is established, the court may be justified in . . . requiring class members to file statements of their claims . . . .” (first omission in original) (quoting 7B Wright, Miller & Kane, Federal Practice & Procedure § 1787 at 217 (2d ed. 1986))); Kyriazi v. W. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Piercegreen1 sentence2019N.J.S.A. 2C:44-3(a); N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7(a)(2); State v. Pierce, 188 N.J. 155, 168 (2006). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. William Day, A/K/A William McNeilgreen1 sentence2017During plea bargaining, "a defendant has the right to make a reasonably informed decision whether to accept a plea offer." United States v. Day, 969 F.2d 39, 43 (3d Cir. 1992); see also State v. Nichols, 71 N.J. 358, 361 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Nicholsgreen1 sentence2017During plea bargaining, "a defendant has the right to make a reasonably informed decision whether to accept a plea offer." United States v. Day, 969 F.2d 39, 43 (3d Cir. 1992); see also State v. Nichols, 71 N.J. 358, 361 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bieniekgreen1 sentence2017Consequently, there is no reason to second-guess the trial court's application of the sentencing factors, nor any reason to conclude that the sentence "shocks the judicial conscience." Roth, supra, 95 N.J. at 364 ; see also State v. Bieniek, 200 N.J. 601, 612 (2010) (reiterating that appellate courts must accord deference to trial judges in sentencing decisions). | 1 | 1 |
Von Moltke v. Gilliesgreen2 sentences2017"Prior to trial an accused is entitled to rely upon his counsel to make an independent examination of the facts, circumstances, pleadings and laws involved and then to offer his informed opinion as to what plea should be entered." Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708, 721 , 68 S. Ct. 316, 322 , 92 L. 2017"Prior to trial an accused is entitled to rely upon his counsel to make an independent examination of the facts, circumstances, pleadings and laws involved and then to offer his informed opinion as to what plea should be entered." Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708, 721 , 68 S. Ct. 316, 322 , 92 L. | 1 | 1 |
Ford v. Reichertgreen1 sentence1966Ford v. Reichert, 23 N.J. 429, 435 (1957). *176 The other questions presented on this appeal are academic as a result of the foregoing disposition. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miranda v. Arizona
green
1 sentence2021They all want it"; and "I've had my fair share of rapes." During defendant's police interview, he claimed "ninety percent" of these posts were satirical and for shock value. 3 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Roth
green
2 sentences2017Consequently, there is no reason to second-guess the trial court's application of the sentencing factors, nor any reason to conclude that the sentence "shocks the judicial conscience." Roth, supra, 95 N.J. at 364 ; see also State v. Bieniek, 200 N.J. 601, 612 (2010) (reiterating that appellate courts must accord deference to trial judges in sentencing decisions). 2017Consequently, there is no reason to second-guess the trial court's application of the sentencing factors, nor any reason to conclude that the sentence "shocks the judicial conscience." Roth, supra, 95 N.J. at 364 ; see also State v. Bieniek, 200 N.J. 601, 612 (2010) (reiterating that appellate courts must accord deference to trial judges in sentencing decisions). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.