Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Skolautgreen2 sentences2024It then held that while post-probationary-period conduct cannot be considered by the court during the violation stage, it can be considered during the disposition stage if a violation is established. 286 Kan. at 234 . 2018See State v. Skolaut , 286 Kan. 219 , Syl. ¶ 9, 182 P.3d 1231 (2008) (explaining that "post-probationary-period conduct cannot be considered by the court during the violation stage of the proceedings"). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lafler v. Cooper
green
2 sentences2020During plea negotiations, a defendant is entitled to the effective assistance of competent counsel. 566 U.S. at 162 . 2012Ed. 2d 763 (1970).” Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. _ , 132 S. Ct. 1376, 1384 , 182 L. | 2 | 2012–2020 |
State v. Cash
green
2 sentences2013Therefore, a sentencing court has no authority to order a term of [lifetime] postrelease supervision in conjunction with an off-grid indeterminate life sentence.’ ” State v. Summers, 293 Kan. 819, 832 , 272 P.3d 1 (2012) (quoting State v. Cash, 293 Kan. 326 , Syl. ¶ 2, 263 P.3d 786 [2011]). 2013Therefore, a sentencing court has no authority to order a term of [lifetime] postrelease supervision in conjunction with an off-grid indeterminate life sentence.’ ” State v. Summers, 293 Kan. 819, 832 , 272 P.3d 1 (2012) (quoting State v. Cash, 293 Kan. 326 , Syl. ¶ 2, 263 P.3d 786 [2011]). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Summers
green
2 sentences2013Therefore, a sentencing court has no authority to order a term of [lifetime] postrelease supervision in conjunction with an off-grid indeterminate life sentence.’ ” State v. Summers, 293 Kan. 819, 832 , 272 P.3d 1 (2012) (quoting State v. Cash, 293 Kan. 326 , Syl. ¶ 2, 263 P.3d 786 [2011]). 2013Therefore, a sentencing court has no authority to order a term of [lifetime] postrelease supervision in conjunction with an off-grid indeterminate life sentence.’ ” State v. Summers, 293 Kan. 819, 832 , 272 P.3d 1 (2012) (quoting State v. Cash, 293 Kan. 326 , Syl. ¶ 2, 263 P.3d 786 [2011]). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
McMann v. Richardson
green
2 sentences2012“Defendants have a Sixth Amendment right to counsel, a right that extends to the plea-bargaining process. [Citations omitted.] During plea negotiations defendants are ‘entitled to the effective assistance of competent counsel.’ McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 771 , 90 S. Ct. 1441 , 25 L. 2012“Defendants have a Sixth Amendment right to counsel, a right that extends to the plea-bargaining process. [Citations omitted.] During plea negotiations defendants are ‘entitled to the effective assistance of competent counsel.’ McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 771 , 90 S. Ct. 1441 , 25 L. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences2000Important to our consideration is the fact that defendant only raised an objection at the same time defendant made a motion to dismiss for lack of evidence. ‘When a pretrial motion to suppress has been denied, the moving party must object to introduction of the evidence at trial in order to preserve the issue for appeal.” State v. Jones, 267 Kan. 627, 637 , 984 P.2d 132 (1999). 2000Important to our consideration is the fact that defendant only raised an objection at the same time defendant made a motion to dismiss for lack of evidence. ‘When a pretrial motion to suppress has been denied, the moving party must object to introduction of the evidence at trial in order to preserve the issue for appeal.” State v. Jones, 267 Kan. 627, 637 , 984 P.2d 132 (1999). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.