6 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Everitt v. Lovittgreen2 sentences2010We reaffirm that the “rule requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies will be applied even though a party contends that the action of the administrative agency is beyond the power and jurisdiction of the agency.” Everitt v. Lovitt, 192 So.2d 422, 428 (Miss.1966). 2008We reaffirm that the “rule requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies will be applied even though a party contends that the action of the administrative agency is beyond the power and jurisdiction of the agency.” Everitt v. Lovitt, 192 So. 2d 422, 428 (Miss. 17 1966). | 2 | 2 |
Young v. Mississippi State Tax Com'ngreen2 sentences1999Young v. Mississippi State Tax Comm'n, 635 So.2d 869, 874 (Miss.1994) (citing Bertucci v. Mississippi Dep't of Corrections, 597 So.2d 643 (Miss.1992)). ¶ 12. 1997Young v. Mississippi State Tax Comm'n, 635 So. 2d 869, 874 (Miss.1994) (citing Bertucci v. Mississippi Dep't of Corrections, 597 So. 2d 643 (Miss.1992)). ¶12. | 2 | 2 |
Matter of Carroll v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.green2 sentences2006The near-inconsistency in McLane-Southern of allowing uncorroborated hearsay as evidence, then not letting it be sufficient by itself to support a decision, has been called the "residuum rule." As explained by perhaps the preeminent American authority on administrative law, Professor Kenneth Culp Davis and his co-author Professor Richard Pierce, an agency under that rule could "accept any evidence that is offered, still in the end there must be a residuum of legal evidence to support the claim before an award can be made." II DAVIS & PIERCE, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE, § 10.4 (3d ed.1994) at 2006The near-inconsistency in McLane-Southern of allowing uncorroborated hearsay as evidence, then not letting it be sufficient by itself to support a decision, has been called the "residuum rule." As explained by perhaps the preeminent American authority on administrative law, Professor Kenneth Culp Davis and his co-author Professor Richard Pierce, an agency under that rule could "accept any evidence that is offered, still in the end there must be a residuum of legal evidence to support the claim before an award can be made." II DAVIS & PIERCE, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE, § 10.4 (3d ed.1994) at | 1 | 1 |
Gulf Guaranty Life Ins. Co. v. Middletongreen1 sentence1985See Gulf Guaranty Life Insurance Co. v. Middleton, 361 So.2d 1377, 1383 (Miss. 1978); Clow Corporation v. J.D. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bertucci v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
green
2 sentences1999Young v. Mississippi State Tax Comm'n, 635 So.2d 869, 874 (Miss.1994) (citing Bertucci v. Mississippi Dep't of Corrections, 597 So.2d 643 (Miss.1992)). ¶ 12. 1997Young v. Mississippi State Tax Comm'n, 635 So. 2d 869, 874 (Miss.1994) (citing Bertucci v. Mississippi Dep't of Corrections, 597 So. 2d 643 (Miss.1992)). ¶12. | 2 | 1997–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.