6 Nevada opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moody v. Manny's Auto Repairred2 sentences2012Id. at 120 ; see Billingsley v. Stockmen’s Hotel, 111 Nev. 1033, 1037 , 901 P.2d 141, 144 (1995) (providing that “[proprietors, like all other persons, have an obligation to act reasonably towards other persons”); Moody v. Manny’s Auto Repair, 110 Nev. 320, 333 , 871 P.2d 935, 943 (1994) (maintaining that “determinations of liability should primarily depend upon whether the owner or occupier of land acted reasonably under the circumstances”). 2012Id. at 120 ; see Billingsley v. Stockmen’s Hotel, 111 Nev. 1033, 1037 , 901 P.2d 141, 144 (1995) (providing that “[proprietors, like all other persons, have an obligation to act reasonably towards other persons”); Moody v. Manny’s Auto Repair, 110 Nev. 320, 333 , 871 P.2d 935, 943 (1994) (maintaining that “determinations of liability should primarily depend upon whether the owner or occupier of land acted reasonably under the circumstances”). | 1 | 1 |
Billingsley v. Stockmen's Hotel, Inc.green2 sentences2012Id. at 120 ; see Billingsley v. Stockmen’s Hotel, 111 Nev. 1033, 1037 , 901 P.2d 141, 144 (1995) (providing that “[proprietors, like all other persons, have an obligation to act reasonably towards other persons”); Moody v. Manny’s Auto Repair, 110 Nev. 320, 333 , 871 P.2d 935, 943 (1994) (maintaining that “determinations of liability should primarily depend upon whether the owner or occupier of land acted reasonably under the circumstances”). 2012Id. at 120 ; see Billingsley v. Stockmen’s Hotel, 111 Nev. 1033, 1037 , 901 P.2d 141, 144 (1995) (providing that “[proprietors, like all other persons, have an obligation to act reasonably towards other persons”); Moody v. Manny’s Auto Repair, 110 Nev. 320, 333 , 871 P.2d 935, 943 (1994) (maintaining that “determinations of liability should primarily depend upon whether the owner or occupier of land acted reasonably under the circumstances”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Castle v. Simmons
green
2 sentences2018In adopting this modified rule, Castle specifically recognized that courts must review domestic violence evidence when determining the child's best interest. 120 Nev. at 105-06 , 86 P.3d at 1047-48 . 2018In adopting this modified rule, Castle specifically recognized that courts must review domestic violence evidence when determining the child's best interest. 120 Nev. at 105-06 , 86 P.3d at 1047-48 . | 5 | 2018–2018 |
Jacqueline E. Michalski v. The Home Depot, Inc.
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 120 ; see Billingsley v. Stockmen’s Hotel, 111 Nev. 1033, 1037 , 901 P.2d 141, 144 (1995) (providing that “[proprietors, like all other persons, have an obligation to act reasonably towards other persons”); Moody v. Manny’s Auto Repair, 110 Nev. 320, 333 , 871 P.2d 935, 943 (1994) (maintaining that “determinations of liability should primarily depend upon whether the owner or occupier of land acted reasonably under the circumstances”). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.