Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kentucky opinions name it 3 courts 1933–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ætna Insurance v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2019See Woods v. Commonwealth, 142 S.W.3d 24, 43 (Ky. 2004) (citing Aetna Insurance Co. v. Johnson, 74 Ky. 587, 593 (1874)). | 1 | 1 |
Woods Ex Rel. Simpson v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2019See Woods v. Commonwealth, 142 S.W.3d 24, 43 (Ky. 2004) (citing Aetna Insurance Co. v. Johnson, 74 Ky. 587, 593 (1874)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Snawder v. Stice
green
1 sentence2010Roark v. Alva Coal Corporation, 371 S.W.2d 856 (Ky.1963); Wolf Creek Collieries v. Crum, 673 S.W.2d 735 (Ky.App.1984); Snawder v. Stice, 576 S.W.2d 276 (Ky.App.1979). 3 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Roark v. Alva Coal Corporation
green
1 sentence2010Roark v. Alva Coal Corporation, 371 S.W.2d 856 (Ky.1963); Wolf Creek Collieries v. Crum, 673 S.W.2d 735 (Ky.App.1984); Snawder v. Stice, 576 S.W.2d 276 (Ky.App.1979). 3 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Wolf Creek Collieries v. Crum
green
1 sentence2010Roark v. Alva Coal Corporation, 371 S.W.2d 856 (Ky.1963); Wolf Creek Collieries v. Crum, 673 S.W.2d 735 (Ky.App.1984); Snawder v. Stice, 576 S.W.2d 276 (Ky.App.1979). 3 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Moore v. Moore
green
2 sentences1953In the case of Moore v. Moore, 301 Ky. 14 , 190 S.W.2d 689, 690 , it was said: “But the general rules of evidence do not apply in a case of this kind. 1953In the case of Moore v. Moore, 301 Ky. 14 , 190 S.W.2d 689, 690 , it was said: “But the general rules of evidence do not apply in a case of this kind. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Hocker v. Pendleton
green
2 sentences1943The Chancellor in his opinion cited the case of Hocker et al. v. Pendleton, 100 Ky. 726 , 39 S. W. 250 , in which we said: “It is clear, however, that an election may be free from violence, and yet, if from a failure of the officers to supply ballots, booths, stencils, etc., any large proportion of the electors is prevented from voting, it can properly be said there has not been a free election, within the meaning of the constitution. ’ ’ Appellant insists that the present case falls within the modified rule stated in the case of Wallbrecht v. Ingram, 164 Ky. 463 , 175 S. W. 1022, 1028 , to th 1943The Chancellor in his opinion cited the case of Hocker et al. v. Pendleton, 100 Ky. 726 , 39 S. W. 250 , in which we said: “It is clear, however, that an election may be free from violence, and yet, if from a failure of the officers to supply ballots, booths, stencils, etc., any large proportion of the electors is prevented from voting, it can properly be said there has not been a free election, within the meaning of the constitution. ’ ’ Appellant insists that the present case falls within the modified rule stated in the case of Wallbrecht v. Ingram, 164 Ky. 463 , 175 S. W. 1022, 1028 , to th | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Wallbrecht v. Ingram
green
2 sentences1943The Chancellor in his opinion cited the case of Hocker et al. v. Pendleton, 100 Ky. 726 , 39 S. W. 250 , in which we said: “It is clear, however, that an election may be free from violence, and yet, if from a failure of the officers to supply ballots, booths, stencils, etc., any large proportion of the electors is prevented from voting, it can properly be said there has not been a free election, within the meaning of the constitution. ’ ’ Appellant insists that the present case falls within the modified rule stated in the case of Wallbrecht v. Ingram, 164 Ky. 463 , 175 S. W. 1022, 1028 , to th 1943The Chancellor in his opinion cited the case of Hocker et al. v. Pendleton, 100 Ky. 726 , 39 S. W. 250 , in which we said: “It is clear, however, that an election may be free from violence, and yet, if from a failure of the officers to supply ballots, booths, stencils, etc., any large proportion of the electors is prevented from voting, it can properly be said there has not been a free election, within the meaning of the constitution. ’ ’ Appellant insists that the present case falls within the modified rule stated in the case of Wallbrecht v. Ingram, 164 Ky. 463 , 175 S. W. 1022, 1028 , to th | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Watts
neutral
2 sentences1937R. 1206, Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Watts, 251 Ky. 832 , 66 S. W. (2d) 39 , and Southern Trust Co. v. First-City Bank & Trust Co., 259 Ky. 151 , 82 S. W. (2d) 205 , are illustrations of the modified exception as to future rents, profits, etc., from mortgaged real estate. 1937R. 1206, Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Watts, 251 Ky. 832 , 66 S. W. (2d) 39 , and Southern Trust Co. v. First-City Bank & Trust Co., 259 Ky. 151 , 82 S. W. (2d) 205 , are illustrations of the modified exception as to future rents, profits, etc., from mortgaged real estate. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Southern Trust Co. v. First-City Bank & Trust Co.
green
2 sentences1937R. 1206, Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Watts, 251 Ky. 832 , 66 S. W. (2d) 39 , and Southern Trust Co. v. First-City Bank & Trust Co., 259 Ky. 151 , 82 S. W. (2d) 205 , are illustrations of the modified exception as to future rents, profits, etc., from mortgaged real estate. 1937R. 1206, Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Watts, 251 Ky. 832 , 66 S. W. (2d) 39 , and Southern Trust Co. v. First-City Bank & Trust Co., 259 Ky. 151 , 82 S. W. (2d) 205 , are illustrations of the modified exception as to future rents, profits, etc., from mortgaged real estate. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Downer v. Porter
neutral
2 sentences1933J. 640; Downer v. Porter, 116 Ky. 422 , 76 S. W. 135 , 25 Ky. Law Rep. 571 . *799 This rule is modified to some extent by the English courts, and the courts of some of the states have followed the modified rule; but in those states the courts hold that before the client can be charged with the knowledge of the attorney, there must be clear proof that the knowledge which the attorney once had, and which he had obtained in another transaction, at another time, and from another client, was present in his mind at the very time of the transaction in question; the burden resting upon the one claimin 1933J. 640; Downer v. Porter, 116 Ky. 422 , 76 S. W. 135 , 25 Ky. Law Rep. 571 . *799 This rule is modified to some extent by the English courts, and the courts of some of the states have followed the modified rule; but in those states the courts hold that before the client can be charged with the knowledge of the attorney, there must be clear proof that the knowledge which the attorney once had, and which he had obtained in another transaction, at another time, and from another client, was present in his mind at the very time of the transaction in question; the burden resting upon the one claimin | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.