5 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ward v. Rock Against Racismgreen2 sentences2004See Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Washington Mobilization Comm. v. Cullinane, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 215, 227 , 566 F.2d 107, 119 (1977). 4 While the First Amendment reflects this nation’s commitment to the principle that “debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open,” New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964) (internal citations omitted); accord Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312, 318 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 (1988), “the government may make reasonable regulations, unrela 2004See Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Washington Mobilization Comm. v. Cullinane, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 215, 227 , 566 F.2d 107, 119 (1977). 4 While the First Amendment reflects this nation’s commitment to the principle that “debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open,” New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964) (internal citations omitted); accord Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312, 318 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 (1988), “the government may make reasonable regulations, unrela | 1 | 1 |
Leiss v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2004See Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Washington Mobilization Comm. v. Cullinane, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 215, 227 , 566 F.2d 107, 119 (1977). 4 While the First Amendment reflects this nation’s commitment to the principle that “debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open,” New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964) (internal citations omitted); accord Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312, 318 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 (1988), “the government may make reasonable regulations, unrela | 1 | 1 |
Washington Mobilization Committee v. Maurice J. Cullinane, Chief of the Metropolitan Police Departmentgreen2 sentences2004See Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Washington Mobilization Comm. v. Cullinane, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 215, 227 , 566 F.2d 107, 119 (1977). 4 While the First Amendment reflects this nation’s commitment to the principle that “debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open,” New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964) (internal citations omitted); accord Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312, 318 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 (1988), “the government may make reasonable regulations, unrela 2004See Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Washington Mobilization Comm. v. Cullinane, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 215, 227 , 566 F.2d 107, 119 (1977). 4 While the First Amendment reflects this nation’s commitment to the principle that “debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open,” New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964) (internal citations omitted); accord Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312, 318 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 (1988), “the government may make reasonable regulations, unrela | 1 | 1 |
Casper v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2004See Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Washington Mobilization Comm. v. Cullinane, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 215, 227 , 566 F.2d 107, 119 (1977). 4 While the First Amendment reflects this nation’s commitment to the principle that “debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open,” New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964) (internal citations omitted); accord Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312, 318 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 (1988), “the government may make reasonable regulations, unrela 2004See Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Washington Mobilization Comm. v. Cullinane, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 215, 227 , 566 F.2d 107, 119 (1977). 4 While the First Amendment reflects this nation’s commitment to the principle that “debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open,” New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964) (internal citations omitted); accord Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312, 318 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 (1988), “the government may make reasonable regulations, unrela | 1 | 1 |
Boos v. Barrygreen2 sentences2004See Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Washington Mobilization Comm. v. Cullinane, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 215, 227 , 566 F.2d 107, 119 (1977). 4 While the First Amendment reflects this nation’s commitment to the principle that “debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open,” New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964) (internal citations omitted); accord Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312, 318 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 (1988), “the government may make reasonable regulations, unrela 2004See Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Washington Mobilization Comm. v. Cullinane, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 215, 227 , 566 F.2d 107, 119 (1977). 4 While the First Amendment reflects this nation’s commitment to the principle that “debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open,” New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964) (internal citations omitted); accord Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312, 318 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 (1988), “the government may make reasonable regulations, unrela | 1 | 1 |
Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violencegreen2 sentences2004See also Clark v. Cmty. for Creative Non-Violence, 468 U.S. 288, 293 , 104 S.Ct. 3065 , 82 L.Ed.2d 221 (1984) (“[e]xpression, whether oral or written or symbolized by conduct, is subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions”). 2004See also Clark v. Cmty. for Creative Non-Violence, 468 U.S. 288, 293 , 104 S.Ct. 3065 , 82 L.Ed.2d 221 (1984) (“[e]xpression, whether oral or written or symbolized by conduct, is subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions”). | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Samuelsgreen1 sentence1997Id. (“An earlier jury’s determination of an individual’s mental state at some past time is not proof of his or her current condition. | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Lomaxgreen1 sentence1986In re Lomax, 367 A.2d 1272, 1281-82 (D.C.1976), reversed on other grounds and vacated en banc, 386 A.2d 1185 (D.C.1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Indiana
green
1 sentence2022Jackson, 406 U.S. at 730 . 40 commitment. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
green
2 sentences2004See Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Washington Mobilization Comm. v. Cullinane, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 215, 227 , 566 F.2d 107, 119 (1977). 4 While the First Amendment reflects this nation’s commitment to the principle that “debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open,” New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964) (internal citations omitted); accord Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312, 318 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 (1988), “the government may make reasonable regulations, unrela 2004See Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 , 109 S.Ct. 2746 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Washington Mobilization Comm. v. Cullinane, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 215, 227 , 566 F.2d 107, 119 (1977). 4 While the First Amendment reflects this nation’s commitment to the principle that “debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open,” New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964) (internal citations omitted); accord Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312, 318 , 108 S.Ct. 1157 , 99 L.Ed.2d 333 (1988), “the government may make reasonable regulations, unrela | 1 | 2004–2004 |
In the Matter of Lomax
green
1 sentence1986In re Lomax, 367 A.2d 1272, 1281-82 (D.C.1976), reversed on other grounds and vacated en banc, 386 A.2d 1185 (D.C.1978). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
District of Columbia v. Pryor
green
1 sentence1978District of Columbia v. Pryor, D.C.App., 366 A.2d 141 (1976). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.