just rule in Florida

1952See Annotation to Lemp v. Lemp, 62 Nev. 91 , 141 P.2d 212 , found in 148 A.L.R. 1124 , and cases cited.” See also First National Bank of Nevada v. Wolff, 66 Nev. 51 , 202 P.2d 878, 881 , wherein it was stated that “In the cases called to our attention which are concerned with the question now before the court, rights granted by operation of law and based upon the marital relationship, such as dower and homestead rights, are held to be 'property rights."' For further growth and development of the law on this subject see: Matuszek v. Matuszek, 160 Pa.Super. 526 , 52 A.2d 381 ; Owen v. Owen, 208

1952See Annotation to Lemp v. Lemp, 62 Nev. 91 , 141 P.2d 212 , found in 148 A.L.R. 1124 , and cases cited.” See also First National Bank of Nevada v. Wolff, 66 Nev. 51 , 202 P.2d 878, 881 , wherein it was stated that “In the cases called to our attention which are concerned with the question now before the court, rights granted by operation of law and based upon the marital relationship, such as dower and homestead rights, are held to be 'property rights."' For further growth and development of the law on this subject see: Matuszek v. Matuszek, 160 Pa.Super. 526 , 52 A.2d 381 ; Owen v. Owen, 208

1952See Annotation to Lemp v. Lemp, 62 Nev. 91 , 141 P.2d 212 , found in 148 A.L.R. 1124 , and cases cited.” See also First National Bank of Nevada v. Wolff, 66 Nev. 51 , 202 P.2d 878, 881 , wherein it was stated that “In the cases called to our attention which are concerned with the question now before the court, rights granted by operation of law and based upon the marital relationship, such as dower and homestead rights, are held to be 'property rights."' For further growth and development of the law on this subject see: Matuszek v. Matuszek, 160 Pa.Super. 526 , 52 A.2d 381 ; Owen v. Owen, 208

1952See Annotation to Lemp v. Lemp, 62 Nev. 91 , 141 P.2d 212 , found in 148 A.L.R. 1124 , and cases cited.” See also First National Bank of Nevada v. Wolff, 66 Nev. 51 , 202 P.2d 878, 881 , wherein it was stated that “In the cases called to our attention which are concerned with the question now before the court, rights granted by operation of law and based upon the marital relationship, such as dower and homestead rights, are held to be 'property rights."' For further growth and development of the law on this subject see: Matuszek v. Matuszek, 160 Pa.Super. 526 , 52 A.2d 381 ; Owen v. Owen, 208

1952See Annotation to Lemp v. Lemp, 62 Nev. 91 , 141 P.2d 212 , found in 148 A.L.R. 1124 , and cases cited.” See also First National Bank of Nevada v. Wolff, 66 Nev. 51 , 202 P.2d 878, 881 , wherein it was stated that “In the cases called to our attention which are concerned with the question now before the court, rights granted by operation of law and based upon the marital relationship, such as dower and homestead rights, are held to be 'property rights."' For further growth and development of the law on this subject see: Matuszek v. Matuszek, 160 Pa.Super. 526 , 52 A.2d 381 ; Owen v. Owen, 208

1952See Annotation to Lemp v. Lemp, 62 Nev. 91 , 141 P.2d 212 , found in 148 A.L.R. 1124 , and cases cited.” See also First National Bank of Nevada v. Wolff, 66 Nev. 51 , 202 P.2d 878, 881 , wherein it was stated that “In the cases called to our attention which are concerned with the question now before the court, rights granted by operation of law and based upon the marital relationship, such as dower and homestead rights, are held to be 'property rights."' For further growth and development of the law on this subject see: Matuszek v. Matuszek, 160 Pa.Super. 526 , 52 A.2d 381 ; Owen v. Owen, 208

1952See Annotation to Lemp v. Lemp, 62 Nev. 91 , 141 P.2d 212 , found in 148 A.L.R. 1124 , and cases cited.” See also First National Bank of Nevada v. Wolff, 66 Nev. 51 , 202 P.2d 878, 881 , wherein it was stated that “In the cases called to our attention which are concerned with the question now before the court, rights granted by operation of law and based upon the marital relationship, such as dower and homestead rights, are held to be 'property rights."' For further growth and development of the law on this subject see: Matuszek v. Matuszek, 160 Pa.Super. 526 , 52 A.2d 381 ; Owen v. Owen, 208

1951We think that under the facts shown the plaintiff was entitled to an equitable lien under the doctrine announced by this court in Jones as Trustee v. Carpenter, 90 Fla. 407 , 106 So. 127 , 43 A.L.R. 1409 .

1951We think that under the facts shown the plaintiff was entitled to an equitable lien under the doctrine announced by this court in Jones as Trustee v. Carpenter, 90 Fla. 407 , 106 So. 127 , 43 A.L.R. 1409 .

1941On the other hand, it is well recognized that the voluntary marital cohabitation by the wife with her husband after acts of cruelty on his part which would have entitled her to a divorce will constitute condonation.” We recognize the rule to be as stated in Fekany v. Fekany, 118 Fla. 698 , 160 Sou. 192 , viz.: “Condonation in the law of divorce is the forgiveness of an antecedent matrimonial offense on condition that it shall not be repeated, and that the offender shall thereafter treat the forgiving party with conjugal kindness.

1941On the other hand, it is well recognized that the voluntary marital cohabitation by the wife with her husband after acts of cruelty on his part which would have entitled her to a divorce will constitute condonation.” We recognize the rule to be as stated in Fekany v. Fekany, 118 Fla. 698 , 160 Sou. 192 , viz.: “Condonation in the law of divorce is the forgiveness of an antecedent matrimonial offense on condition that it shall not be repeated, and that the offender shall thereafter treat the forgiving party with conjugal kindness.

1927Newman v. Smith, supra; Addington v. Wilson, 5 Ind. 137 , 61 Am.

1878Where the husband has repaid money loaned him by his wife, or transferred to her property in satisfaction of a just claim, she acquires a valid title which a court of equity will enforce. 44 N. Y., 298 ; 51 N. Y., 395 ; 51 Ill., 325 ; 7 Bush, 394 ; 29 Wis., 136 ; 2 Story Eq., 1372 to 1374.

1878Where the husband has repaid money loaned him by his wife, or transferred to her property in satisfaction of a just claim, she acquires a valid title which a court of equity will enforce. 44 N. Y., 298 ; 51 N. Y., 395 ; 51 Ill., 325 ; 7 Bush, 394 ; 29 Wis., 136 ; 2 Story Eq., 1372 to 1374.

1878Where the husband has repaid money loaned him by his wife, or transferred to her property in satisfaction of a just claim, she acquires a valid title which a court of equity will enforce. 44 N. Y., 298 ; 51 N. Y., 395 ; 51 Ill., 325 ; 7 Bush, 394 ; 29 Wis., 136 ; 2 Story Eq., 1372 to 1374.

1878Where the husband has repaid money loaned him by his wife, or transferred to her property in satisfaction of a just claim, she acquires a valid title which a court of equity will enforce. 44 N. Y., 298 ; 51 N. Y., 395 ; 51 Ill., 325 ; 7 Bush, 394 ; 29 Wis., 136 ; 2 Story Eq., 1372 to 1374.