premise rule (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

premise rule in Iowa

5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re the Marriage of Wallacegreen
iowactapp · 1981 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
1 sentence

1989However, the “critical inquiry is whether the distribution is equitable in the particular circumstances of this case.” In re Marriage of Wallace, 315 N.W.2d 827, 830 (Iowa App.1981).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Heemstra green
iowa · 2006
2 sentences

2018The premise of the rule is that there are certain felonies that “are so inherently dangerous that proof of participating in these crimes may obviate the need for showing all of the elements normally required for first-degree murder.” Heemstra, 721 N.W.2d at 554 .

2018The premise of the rule is that there are certain felonies that "are so inherently dangerous that proof of participating in these crimes may obviate the need for showing all of the elements normally required for first-degree murder." Heemstra , 721 N.W.2d at 554 .

22018–2018
United States v. Leon green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

2000Accordingly, in Leon , when the Court' considered whether a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule should be adopted, it started with the premise that the rule’s'-application should ■be limited to those situations in which it accomplished its deterrent effect. 468 U.S. at 909 , 104 S.Ct. at 3413 , 82 L.Ed.2d at 690 .

2000Accordingly, in Leon , when the Court' considered whether a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule should be adopted, it started with the premise that the rule’s'-application should ■be limited to those situations in which it accomplished its deterrent effect. 468 U.S. at 909 , 104 S.Ct. at 3413 , 82 L.Ed.2d at 690 .

12000–2000
Wilson v. Ceretti green
iowa · 1973
1 sentence

1991In Wilson v. Ceretti, 210 N.W.2d 643 (Iowa 1973), we examined the effect of error in granting excessive peremptory challenges to defendant.

11991–1991
In Re the Marriage of Lattig green
iowactapp · 1982
1 sentence

1989We stated “the underlying premise of our analysis is that an equitable property division of the appreciated value of the property should be a function of the tangible contributions of each party and not the mere existence of the marital relationship.” Id. at 815 .

11989–1989

Where else courts name it

MA 76 (1983–2026) CA 41 (1952–2025) PA 25 (1941–2025) FL 21 (1961–2026) TX 20 (1987–2026) LA 19 (1962–2018) NJ 15 (1940–2025) WA 15 (1973–2024) MI 14 (1978–2026) IL 14 (1943–2022) NY 13 (1959–2020) ME 10 (1999–2025) MD 9 (1979–2022) KY 9 (1952–2018) MO 8 (1980–2024) OH 8 (1998–2011) OR 8 (1977–2025) IN 7 (1976–2020) GA 6 (1985–2021) UT 6 (2007–2023) OK 5 (1976–2023) TN 5 (1992–2012) VA 5 (1978–2025) KS 5 (1971–2018) AL 5 (1910–2014) AZ 5 (1973–2001) IA 5 (1989–2018) MT 4 (1914–2010) DE 4 (1972–2008) WI 4 (2005–2024) CT 4 (1987–2000) CO 3 (1988–2019) ND 3 (1980–2009) WY 3 (1961–2001) ID 3 (2021–2026) AK 2 (1994–1997) DC 2 (1989–2014) NM 2 (2019–2025) SD 2 (1959–1978) VT 2 (2000–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check