Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 682.014 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 682.014 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 682.014

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 682
ARBITRATION CODE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 682.014
682.014 Effect of agreement to arbitrate; nonwaivable provisions.
(1) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (2) and (3), a party to an agreement to arbitrate or to an arbitration proceeding may waive, or the parties may vary the effect of, the requirements of this chapter to the extent permitted by law.
(2) Before a controversy arises that is subject to an agreement to arbitrate, a party to the agreement may not:
(a) Waive or agree to vary the effect of the requirements of:
1. Commencing a petition for judicial relief under s. 682.015(1);
2. Making agreements to arbitrate valid, enforceable, and irrevocable under s. 682.02(1);
3. Permitting provisional remedies under s. 682.031;
4. Conferring authority on arbitrators to issue subpoenas and permit depositions under s. 682.08(1) or (2);
5. Conferring jurisdiction under s. 682.181; or
6. Stating the bases for appeal under s. 682.20;
(b) Agree to unreasonably restrict the right under s. 682.032 to notice of the initiation of an arbitration proceeding;
(c) Agree to unreasonably restrict the right under s. 682.041 to disclosure of any facts by a neutral arbitrator; or
(d) Waive the right under s. 682.07 of a party to an agreement to arbitrate to be represented by an attorney at any proceeding or hearing under this chapter, but an employer and a labor organization may waive the right to representation by an attorney in a labor arbitration.
(3) A party to an agreement to arbitrate or arbitration proceeding may not waive, or the parties may not vary the effect of, the requirements in this section or:
(a) The applicability of this chapter, the Revised Florida Arbitration Code, under s. 682.013(1) or (4);
(b) The availability of proceedings to compel or stay arbitration under s. 682.03;
(c) The immunity conferred on arbitrators and arbitration organizations under s. 682.051;
(d) A party’s right to seek judicial enforcement of an arbitration preaward ruling under s. 682.081;
(e) The authority conferred on an arbitrator to change an award under s. 682.10(4) or (5);
(f) The right to confirmation of an award as provided under s. 682.12;
(g) The grounds for vacating an arbitration award under s. 682.13;
(h) The grounds for modifying an arbitration award under s. 682.14;
(i) The validity and enforceability of a judgment or decree based on an award under s. 682.15(1) or (2);
(j) The validity of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act under s. 682.23; or
(k) The effect of excluding from arbitration under this chapter disputes involving child custody, visitation, or child support under s. 682.25.
History.s. 5, ch. 2013-232; s. 1, ch. 2014-24.

F.S. 682.014 on Google Scholar

F.S. 682.014 on Casetext

Amendments to 682.014


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 682.014
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 682.014.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 682.014

Total Results: 20

Michael Fisten v. Julie Brown

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-21

Snippet: modified or corrected pursuant to s. 682.10 or s. 682.14 or is vacated pursuant to s. 682.13.” § 682.12

F.R. ALEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. EAC CONSULTING, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-04-05

Snippet: address this issue in the first instance. See § 682.14(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“Upon motion made within

NATIONAL MILLWORK, INC. v. ANF GROUP, INC. and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-26

Citation: 253 So. 3d 1261

Snippet: of the arbitration clause conflict with section 682.014, Florida Statutes (2016). But the circuit court

Florida Capital Group, Inc. v. Bishop

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-02-28

Citation: 240 So. 3d 108

Snippet: the award pursuant to section 682.10 or section 682.14, Florida Statutes, or vacate the award pursuant

Kendall Imports, LLC v. Diaz

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-02-01

Citation: 215 So. 3d 95, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1117

Snippet: correct an award. See 9 U.S.C. § 12; §§ 682.13(2), 682.14 (1), Fla. Stat. (2012). Lastly, the Buyers

Wells v. Halmac Development, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-13

Citation: 189 So. 3d 1015, 2016 WL 1445437, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5586

Snippet: limited to the scope of AAA R-48 or Fla, Stat. § 682.14(l)(a), and the Arbitrator has determined, in accordance

Nestor v. Ward

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-04-08

Citation: 163 So. 3d 582, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5037, 2015 WL 1578710

Snippet: affecting the merits of the controversy. § 682.14(1), Fla. Stat. (2014). In the absence of a

Wells v. Castro

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-07-10

Citation: 117 So. 3d 1233, 2013 WL 3455607, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11051

Snippet: limited to the scope of AAA R-48 or Fla. Stat. § 682.14(l)(a), and the Arbitrator has determined, in accordance

SEIU Florida Public Services Union v. City of Boynton Beach

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-04-18

Citation: 89 So. 3d 960, 2012 WL 1317617, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6055

Snippet: court shall proceed as provided in ss. 682.13 and 682.14.” (emphasis added). Section 682.13(2) provides

State Farm Florida Insurance v. Gonzalez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-12-07

Citation: 76 So. 3d 34, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19530, 2011 WL 6057875

Snippet: of a copy of the award to the applicant....” § 682.14(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). Similarly, an application

Markowitz v. City of Miami

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-03-09

Citation: 56 So. 3d 109, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3186, 2011 WL 799748

Snippet: the award pursuant to sections 682.13(l)(c) and 682.14(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2009), claiming that the

Keyes Co. v. Spencer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-08-12

Citation: 16 So. 3d 213, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11252, 2009 WL 2448405

Snippet: 10, or the court, pursuant to sections 682.13 or 682.14...."). She filed a timely motion to correct the

Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. Cuban-Hebrew Congregation of Miami, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-02-11

Citation: 5 So. 3d 709, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1036, 2009 WL 321604

Snippet: modification of the appraisal award under section 682.14, Florida Statutes (2007). As the trial court saw

Reuter Recycling of Florida Inc. v. City of Hallandale

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-11-12

Citation: 993 So. 2d 1178, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 17335, 2008 WL 4862552

Snippet: concur. . § 682.12, Fla. Stat. (2007). . § 682.14, Fla. Stat. (2007). .§ 682.13, Fla. Stat. (2007)

Wedgewood Holdings, Inc. v. Wilpon

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-01-23

Citation: 972 So. 2d 1044, 2008 WL 183505

Snippet: 10, or the court, pursuant to sections 682.13 or 682.14; otherwise, the award becomes ripe for confirmation

Martin Daytona v. Strickland Const. Serv.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-11-17

Citation: 941 So. 2d 1220, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19308

Snippet: modify or correct the award pursuant to section 682.14, Florida Statutes (2005). [6] See Rock v. Prairie

Marr v. Webb

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-05-03

Citation: 930 So. 2d 734, 2006 WL 1196455

Snippet: authority to modify an arbitration award. Section 682.14, Florida Statutes (2005), enumerates three grounds

Glick v. Retamar

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-03-22

Citation: 922 So. 2d 1108, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3994, 2006 WL 708375

Snippet: or Correct Arbitration Award Pursuant to Section 682.14 or Alternatively to Vacate the Award Pursuant to

Expressway Companies v. Precision Design, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-07-14

Citation: 882 So. 2d 1016, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10496, 2004 WL 1570350

Snippet: motion to modify the award pursuant to section 682.14, Florida Statutes (2003),1 the facts do not support

Zimmerman v. Florida Windstorm Underwriting Ass'n

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-04-20

Citation: 873 So. 2d 411, 2004 WL 832790

Snippet: or modify the decision pursuant to s. 682.13 or 682.14. The department shall adopt rules for arbitration