42 U.S.C. § 409
SELECTION OF INDIVIDUALS TO PARTICIPATE.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 110
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1940–2023 · leading case: Albert G. SMITH, Appellee, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Appellant, 982 F.2d 308 (8th Cir. 1992).
Albert G. SMITH, Appellee, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Appellant, 982 F.2d 308 (8th Cir. 1992). “The magistrate judge rejected the Secretary’s argument that the term “wages” in section 424a must be given the definition listed in another section of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 409 (a), which excludes government earnings.”
Astrue v. Capato Ex Rel. B. N. C., 132 S. Ct. 2021 (2012). “” 42 U. S. C. §409 (m) (1940 ed.) (emphasis added).”
Rose v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 202 F. Supp. 3d 231 (E.D.N.Y 2016). “See 42 U.S.C. § 409 (a)(2); 20 C.F.R. § 404.1049 (b).”
Burger v. Soc. Sec. Bd., 66 F. Supp. 619 (S.D. Cal. 1946). “666, Title II, § 209, 42 U.S.C.A. § 409 , and cannot for that reason be included in his “total wages” for the purpose of computing benefits payable to plaintiffs under the Act.”
Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 315 U.S. 386 (1942). “1373 ; 42 U.S.C. § 409 (a). [24] I.R.C. §§ 1426 (a), 1607 (b), 53 Stat.”
United States ex rel. Shannon Martin, M.D. v. Darren Hathaway, 63 F.4th 1043 (6th Cir. 2023). “The Social Security Act offers a range of settings: “[W]ages” in one context is “remuneration paid,” 42 U.S.C. § 409 (a); services in another are activities “performed for remuneration or gain,” id.”
Better Bus. Bureau of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279 (1946). “1360 , 1374, 1384; 42 U. S. C. § 409 (b) (10), 26 U. S. C. §1426 (b) (10).”
Schmitz v. Callahan, 973 F. Supp. 1021 (D. Kan. 1997). “Commodity Payments Pointing to 42 U.S.C. § 409 (a), which defines “wages” under the Social Security Act for purposes of benefit entitlement, plaintiff insists that the Commissioner erred by including agricultural commodity remuneration in calculating plaintiffs annual earnings.”
Univ. of Chicago v. United States, 547 F.3d 773 (7th Cir. 2008). “The error in this argument is apparent, however, when 42 U.S.C. § 409 (a)(4)(E) is consulted. For purposes of calculating Social Security benefits, the term “wages” is defined generally as all remuneration except payments “under or to an annuity contract described in section…”
Pub. Employees' Ret. Bd. v. Shalala, 153 F.3d 1160 (10th Cir. 1998). “The 1983 amendment, codified at section 3121(v)(l)(B) of the Code and at 42 U.S.C. § 409 (I)(2) (parallel provision), stated that the “picked up” amounts treated as employer contributions under section 414(h)(2) would thereafter be treated as FICA wages, and thus subject to FICA…”
BNSF Ry. Co. v. Loos, 139 S. Ct. 893 (2019). “§ 3121 (a) - (b) (FICA) ; see 42 U.S.C. §§ 409 (a), 410(a) (SSA). Reading these prescriptions together, the term "wages" encompasses "all remuneration" *899 for "any service, of whatever nature, performed .”
State of New Mexico v. Caspar E. Weinberger, Sec'y of Health, Educ., & Welfare,defendant-Appellee, 517 F.2d 989 (10th Cir. 1975). “” The University did not make a Social Security contribution with respect to these payments on the grounds that such payments were excluded from “wages” under 42 U.S.C. § 409 (b). The Social Security Administration thereafter assessed $28.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 409(10) — 1 case
United States v. Aberdeen Aerie No. 24 of Fraternal Order of Eagles, 148 F.2d 655 (9th Cir. 1945).
— 42 U.S.C. § 409(a) — 1 case
Burger v. Soc. Sec. Bd., 66 F. Supp. 619 (S.D. Cal. 1946). “666, Title II, § 209, 42 U.S.C.A. § 409 , and cannot for that reason be included in his “total wages” for the purpose of computing benefits payable to plaintiffs under the Act.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 409(b) — 1 case
Martin v. Fed. Sec. Agency, 174 F.2d 364 (3rd Cir. 1949).
— 42 U.S.C. § 409(b)(1) — 1 case
Christgau v. Woodlawn Cemetery Assn., 293 N.W. 619 (Minn. 1940).
— 42 U.S.C. § 409(e) — 1 case
Howard v. Madigan, 363 F. Supp. 351 (D.S.D. 1973).
— 42 U.S.C. § 409(g) — 3 cases
Morgan v. Soc. Sec. Bd., 45 F. Supp. 349 (M.D. Penn. 1942).
Kelley v. Celebrezze, 243 F. Supp. 18 (D.N.J. 1965).
Martin v. Fed. Sec. Agency, 73 F. Supp. 482 (W.D. Pa. 1947).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.