Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 10 Chapter 201
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012 (2026)

Request for hearing

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : ENFORCEMENT

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 8012)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 67 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1992–2026 · leading case: Sec'y, Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Handy Fam. Enter., 660 A.2d 309 (Vt. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sec'y, Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Handy Fam. Enter., 660 A.2d 309 (Vt. 1995). · cites it 6× “HFE and TCA requested a hearing before the ELD, as authorized by 10 V.S.A. § 8012(a). Following a hearing, the ELD issued findings, conclusions and an order on June 13, 1993.”
Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Duranleau & Duranleau Constr., Inc., 617 A.2d 143 (Vt. 1992). · cites it 3× “The hearing provided for in 10 V.S.A. § 8012 is a de novo evidentiary hearing before the ELD.”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Godnick, 652 A.2d 988 (Vt. 1994). · cites it 2× “In addition, ANR argues that the ELD erred in failing to apply all eight of the penalty criteria of § 8010 and, in particular, the need for deterrence.”
Sec'y, Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Irish, 738 A.2d 571 (Vt. 1999). “Defendant filed a request for hearing on the Agency’s administrative order with the environmental court, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8012(a). By stipulation of the parties, the City’s complaint was consolidated with the proceeding on the administrative order.”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Deso, 2003 VT 36, 824 A.2d 558. “Pursuant to 10 V.S.A § 8012(b)(4), the environmental court reviewed anew the penalty to be assessed against Deso, using the eight criteria set forth at § 8010(b).”
Nat. Resources Bd. Land Use Panel v. Dorr, MGC, Inc., & Dorr Oil Co., 2015 VT 1, 113 A.3d 400. “The order informed respondents of the right to request a hearing before the Environmental Division under 10 V.S.A. § 8012(a), and explained *230 that absent such a request the administrative order would become a final judicial order under 10 V.”
Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Upper Valley Reg'l Landfill Corp., 621 A.2d 225 (Vt. 1992). “TRASH sought and was granted intervenor party status before the environmental law division pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8012(d). Joseph Bivins, a member of TRASH, appeared as TRASH’s representative.”
Sec'y, Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Earth Constr., Inc., 676 A.2d 769 (Vt. 1996). “The record shows that the ELD reduced the $49,420 fine imposed in the Administrative Order after considering all of the statutory criteria.”
Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Bean, 672 A.2d 469 (Vt. 1995). · cites it 2× “Under 10 V.S.A. § 8012(b), the ELD may review and determine anew the amount of any penalties assessed for violations of Act 250 by applying the criteria set forth in 10 V.”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Francis Supeno, Barbara Supeno, & Barbara Ernst, 2018 VT 30, 185 A.3d 1264. “ANR initially imposed a penalty of $29,325, and after respondents requested a hearing before the Environmental Division, the court "review[ed] and determine[d] anew the amount of [the] penalty.”
NRB LUP v. Placzek, No. 154-8-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 25, 2009). · cites it 9× “On August 19, 2009, both Respondents filed a request for a hearing with the Environmental Court, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8012. Respondents’ V.R.A.P. 4(d) Motion to Extend Time to File Request for a Hearing On Sept.”
ANR v. Fern Hill Farm, Ltd. & Stephen Bromley, No. 129-08-03 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 20, 2006). · cites it 9× “58 judgment order may propose one for the Court’s signature so that it is received by the Court on or before January 27, 2006; otherwise 17 it will be deemed to have been provided by the above paragraphs modifying the Administrative Order, as required by 10 V.S.A. §8012(b).…”
Show all 67 citing cases →
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(0): 1 case
ANR v. The Copper Mine Corp., No. 210-10-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 1, 2010).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(a): 8 cases
Sec'y, Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Handy Fam. Enter., 660 A.2d 309 (Vt. 1995). “HFE and TCA requested a hearing before the ELD, as authorized by 10 V.S.A. § 8012(a). Following a hearing, the ELD issued findings, conclusions and an order on June 13, 1993.”
Sec'y, Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Irish, 738 A.2d 571 (Vt. 1999). “Defendant filed a request for hearing on the Agency’s administrative order with the environmental court, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8012(a). By stipulation of the parties, the City’s complaint was consolidated with the proceeding on the administrative order.”
Nat. Resources Bd. Land Use Panel v. Dorr, MGC, Inc., & Dorr Oil Co., 2015 VT 1, 113 A.3d 400. “The order informed respondents of the right to request a hearing before the Environmental Division under 10 V.S.A. § 8012(a), and explained *230 that absent such a request the administrative order would become a final judicial order under 10 V.”
NRB LUP v. Placzek, No. 154-8-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 25, 2009). “On August 19, 2009, both Respondents filed a request for a hearing with the Environmental Court, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8012. Respondents’ V.R.A.P. 4(d) Motion to Extend Time to File Request for a Hearing On Sept.”
ANR v. Shattuck, No. 81-7-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Sept. 27, 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(b): 9 cases
Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Bean, 672 A.2d 469 (Vt. 1995). “Under 10 V.S.A. § 8012(b), the ELD may review and determine anew the amount of any penalties assessed for violations of Act 250 by applying the criteria set forth in 10 V.”
ANR v. Budzyn, No. 141-10-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Sept. 12, 2013).
ANR v. Frye, No. 161-10-11 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 25, 2012).
Vt. Agency of Nat. Resources v. Bean, 672 A.2d 469 (Vt. 1995).
ANR v. South Vill. Owners' Ass'n, No. 33-3-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 17, 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(b)(1): 24 cases
Sec'y, Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Handy Fam. Enter., 660 A.2d 309 (Vt. 1995). “HFE and TCA requested a hearing before the ELD, as authorized by 10 V.S.A. § 8012(a). Following a hearing, the ELD issued findings, conclusions and an order on June 13, 1993.”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Godnick, 652 A.2d 988 (Vt. 1994). “In addition, ANR argues that the ELD erred in failing to apply all eight of the penalty criteria of § 8010 and, in particular, the need for deterrence.”
Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Bean, 672 A.2d 469 (Vt. 1995). “Under 10 V.S.A. § 8012(b), the ELD may review and determine anew the amount of any penalties assessed for violations of Act 250 by applying the criteria set forth in 10 V.”
Vt. Agency of Nat. Resources v. Bean, 672 A.2d 469 (Vt. 1995).
ANR v. Davis dba Davis Contracting Serv., No. 20-2-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 2, 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(b)(2): 11 cases
ANR v. Fern Hill Farm, Ltd. & Stephen Bromley, No. 129-08-03 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 20, 2006). “58 judgment order may propose one for the Court’s signature so that it is received by the Court on or before January 27, 2006; otherwise 17 it will be deemed to have been provided by the above paragraphs modifying the Administrative Order, as required by 10 V.S.A. §8012(b).…”
ANR v. Ruby Constr., Inc. & Royal Harrison, No. 6-1-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 24, 2017).
ANR v. Persons, No. 97-6-10 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 16, 2012).
ANR v. Frye, No. 161-10-11 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 25, 2012).
ANR v. Bacon d/b/a Bacon Timber Harvesting, No. 101-6-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 19, 2010).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(b)(3): 4 cases
ANR v. Deering & Andrews, No. 170-10-10 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 12, 2011).
ANR v. Deering & Andrews, No. 170-10-10 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Sept. 29, 2011).
ANR v. The Copper Mine Corp., No. 210-10-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 1, 2010).
CLF Stormwater Discharge, No. 14-1-07 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 28, 2008).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(b)(4): 17 cases
Sec'y, Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Handy Fam. Enter., 660 A.2d 309 (Vt. 1995). “HFE and TCA requested a hearing before the ELD, as authorized by 10 V.S.A. § 8012(a). Following a hearing, the ELD issued findings, conclusions and an order on June 13, 1993.”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Deso, 2003 VT 36, 824 A.2d 558. “Pursuant to 10 V.S.A § 8012(b)(4), the environmental court reviewed anew the penalty to be assessed against Deso, using the eight criteria set forth at § 8010(b).”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Godnick, 652 A.2d 988 (Vt. 1994). “In addition, ANR argues that the ELD erred in failing to apply all eight of the penalty criteria of § 8010 and, in particular, the need for deterrence.”
Sec'y, Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Earth Constr., Inc., 676 A.2d 769 (Vt. 1996). “The record shows that the ELD reduced the $49,420 fine imposed in the Administrative Order after considering all of the statutory criteria.”
Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Duranleau & Duranleau Constr., Inc., 617 A.2d 143 (Vt. 1992). “The hearing provided for in 10 V.S.A. § 8012 is a de novo evidentiary hearing before the ELD.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(b)(5): 1 case
ANR v. Henry, No. 215-12-10 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 13, 2012).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(b)(l): 1 case
Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Duranleau & Duranleau Constr., Inc., 617 A.2d 143 (Vt. 1992). “The hearing provided for in 10 V.S.A. § 8012 is a de novo evidentiary hearing before the ELD.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(c): 11 cases
NRB LUP v. Placzek, No. 154-8-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 25, 2009). “On August 19, 2009, both Respondents filed a request for a hearing with the Environmental Court, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8012. Respondents’ V.R.A.P. 4(d) Motion to Extend Time to File Request for a Hearing On Sept.”
ANR v. Colaceci, No. 65-5-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Dec. 6, 2016).
ANR v. Colacecci, No. 65-5-15 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 19, 2016).
ANR v. McGee, No. 94-8-15 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 9, 2015).
ANR v. Earle, No. 145-10-11 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Dec. 7, 2011).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(c)(1): 3 cases
ANR v. Blood dba Three Mountain Lodge Restaurant, No. 190-8-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 8, 2010).
ANR v. Steven Whitham d/b/a Prospect Mountain, No. 29-2-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 2, 2009).
ANR v. Fern Hill Farm, Ltd. & Stephen Bromley, No. 129-08-03 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 20, 2006). “58 judgment order may propose one for the Court’s signature so that it is received by the Court on or before January 27, 2006; otherwise 17 it will be deemed to have been provided by the above paragraphs modifying the Administrative Order, as required by 10 V.S.A. §8012(b).…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(c)(2): 5 cases
NRB v. Dorr, No. 49-4-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. May 17, 2013).
ANR v. Blood dba Three Mountain Lodge Restaurant, No. 190-8-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 8, 2010).
ANR v. Steven Whitham d/b/a Prospect Mountain, No. 29-2-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 2, 2009).
LU Panel of NRB v. Sheldon, No. 188-09-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 28, 2006).
ANR v. Fern Hill Farm, Ltd. & Stephen Bromley, No. 129-08-03 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 20, 2006). “58 judgment order may propose one for the Court’s signature so that it is received by the Court on or before January 27, 2006; otherwise 17 it will be deemed to have been provided by the above paragraphs modifying the Administrative Order, as required by 10 V.S.A. §8012(b).…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(c)(3): 4 cases
ANR v. Blood dba Three Mountain Lodge Restaurant, No. 190-8-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 8, 2010).
ANR v. Steven Whitham d/b/a Prospect Mountain, No. 29-2-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 2, 2009).
LU Panel of NRB v. Sheldon, No. 188-09-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 28, 2006).
ANR v. Fern Hill Farm, Ltd. & Stephen Bromley, No. 129-08-03 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 20, 2006). “58 judgment order may propose one for the Court’s signature so that it is received by the Court on or before January 27, 2006; otherwise 17 it will be deemed to have been provided by the above paragraphs modifying the Administrative Order, as required by 10 V.S.A. §8012(b).…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(c)(4): 25 cases
ANR v. Colaceci, No. 65-5-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Dec. 6, 2016).
NRB v. Stratton Corp, No. 106-7-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 17, 2016).
ANR v. South Vill. Owners' Ass'n, No. 33-3-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 17, 2016).
ANR v. Davis dba Davis Contracting Serv., No. 20-2-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 2, 2016).
ANR v. Supeno, Supeno & Ernst, No. 98-8-15 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. May 15, 2017).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(c)(5): 2 cases
NRB v. Dorr, No. 49-4-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. May 17, 2013).
LU Panel of NRB v. Sheldon, No. 188-09-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 28, 2006).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8012(d): 4 cases
Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Upper Valley Reg'l Landfill Corp., 621 A.2d 225 (Vt. 1992). “TRASH sought and was granted intervenor party status before the environmental law division pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8012(d). Joseph Bivins, a member of TRASH, appeared as TRASH’s representative.”
ANR v. Montagne & Branon, No. 291-12-07 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 9, 2008).
ANR v. Stratton Gardens, LLC, No. 30-02-06 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. May 15, 2006).
NRB v. Stratton Corp, No. 106-7-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 17, 2016).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.