5 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Frizzell Construction Co. v. Gatlinburg, L.L.C.green2 sentences2005The agreement expressly allows either party to request arbitration within 60 days after “an amendment,” and no restrictions are stated with respect to the meaning of “amendment.” Furthermore, a construction such as that requested by Ms. Chapman is inconsistent with the overriding policy we recognized in Pyburn v. Bill Heard Chevrolet at page 357: When parties agree to arbitration, the FAA ensures enforcement of that agreement and the States cannot require a judicial forum for the resolution of a claim that the parties agreed to arbitrate. [Frizzell Construction Company, Inc., v. Gatlinburg, L. 2005The agreement expressly allows either party to request arbitration within 60 days after “an amendment,” and no restrictions are stated with respect to the meaning of “amendment.” Furthermore, a construction such as that requested by Ms. Chapman is inconsistent with the overriding policy we recognized in Pyburn v. Bill Heard Chevrolet at page 357: When parties agree to arbitration, the FAA ensures enforcement of that agreement and the States cannot require a judicial forum for the resolution of a claim that the parties agreed to arbitrate. [Frizzell Construction Company, Inc., v. Gatlinburg, L. | 1 | 3 |
Shearon v. Seamangreen1 sentence2007Shearon v. Seaman, 198 S.W.3d 209, 213-214 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005)(citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
green
2 sentences2005The agreement expressly allows either party to request arbitration within 60 days after “an amendment,” and no restrictions are stated with respect to the meaning of “amendment.” Furthermore, a construction such as that requested by Ms. Chapman is inconsistent with the overriding policy we recognized in Pyburn v. Bill Heard Chevrolet at page 357: When parties agree to arbitration, the FAA ensures enforcement of that agreement and the States cannot require a judicial forum for the resolution of a claim that the parties agreed to arbitrate. [Frizzell Construction Company, Inc., v. Gatlinburg, L. 2005The agreement expressly allows either party to request arbitration within 60 days after “an amendment,” and no restrictions are stated with respect to the meaning of “amendment.” Furthermore, a construction such as that requested by Ms. Chapman is inconsistent with the overriding policy we recognized in Pyburn v. Bill Heard Chevrolet at page 357: When parties agree to arbitration, the FAA ensures enforcement of that agreement and the States cannot require a judicial forum for the resolution of a claim that the parties agreed to arbitrate. [Frizzell Construction Company, Inc., v. Gatlinburg, L. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Byrd v. Hall
green
1 sentence2005Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.