Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
American States Insurance v. Rogilliogreen2 sentences2022“It also is a valid consideration that a severely injured plaintiff would suffer ongoing emotional and financial distress due to the delay in resolving the case.” Id. “[T]he fact that ‘the injured plaintiff is without a resolution to her claim for that period of time [(i.e., the period of delay caused by the defendant’s default)]’ constitutes prejudice.” Rogillio, 10 So. 3d at 472 (¶23) (quoting Pittman, 501 So. 2d at 388 ). ¶42. 2021The Supreme Court has held “that the fact that ‘the injured plaintiff is without a resolution to her claim for that period of time[,] i.e., the period of delay caused by the defendant’s default[,]’ constitutes prejudice.” Rogillio, 10 So. 3d at 472 (¶23) (quoting Guar. | 5 | 5 |
Stanford v. Parkergreen2 sentences2009Pittman, 501 So.2d at 388 ; see also Stanford, 822 So.2d at 890 (finding that plaintiffs had suffered substantial prejudice in part from the financial and emotional distress they suffered). 2008Pittman, 501 So. 2d at 388 ; see also Stanford, 822 So. 2d at 890 (finding that plaintiffs had suffered substantial prejudice in part from the financial and emotional distress they suffered). | 2 | 2 |
H & W TRANSFER & CARTAGE SERV. v. Griffingreen1 sentence2014Inc. v. Griffin, 511 So.2d 895, 899 (Miss.1987)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. v. Pittman
green
2 sentences2022“It also is a valid consideration that a severely injured plaintiff would suffer ongoing emotional and financial distress due to the delay in resolving the case.” Id. “[T]he fact that ‘the injured plaintiff is without a resolution to her claim for that period of time [(i.e., the period of delay caused by the defendant’s default)]’ constitutes prejudice.” Rogillio, 10 So. 3d at 472 (¶23) (quoting Pittman, 501 So. 2d at 388 ). ¶42. 2022“It also is a valid consideration that a severely injured plaintiff would suffer ongoing emotional and financial distress due to the delay in resolving the case.” Id. “[T]he fact that ‘the injured plaintiff is without a resolution to her claim for that period of time [(i.e., the period of delay caused by the defendant’s default)]’ constitutes prejudice.” Rogillio, 10 So. 3d at 472 (¶23) (quoting Pittman, 501 So. 2d at 388 ). ¶42. | 6 | 1987–2022 |
Edwards House Co. v. City of Jackson
green
2 sentences1928Failure to object is equivalent to consent; and “consent cures error.” In Edwards House Co. v. City of Jackson, 91 Miss. 429 , 45 So. 14 , it was said, with reference to a statute that did not permit an amendment of the original resolution, that: “The safe time for the property owner to object, if he intends to object, is at the time the law has designated for this when the machinery of government is first put in motion, and not wait until the improvement has been made and the benefits accrued, and then seek to defeat the assessment by finding’ some irregularity in the proceedings leading up t 1928Failure to object is equivalent to consent; and “consent cures error.” In Edwards House Co. v. City of Jackson, 91 Miss. 429 , 45 So. 14 , it was said, with reference to a statute that did not permit an amendment of the original resolution, that: “The safe time for the property owner to object, if he intends to object, is at the time the law has designated for this when the machinery of government is first put in motion, and not wait until the improvement has been made and the benefits accrued, and then seek to defeat the assessment by finding’ some irregularity in the proceedings leading up t | 1 | 1928–1928 |
City of Jackson v. Williams
green
2 sentences1928Failure to object is equivalent to consent; and “consent cures error.” In Edwards House Co. v. City of Jackson, 91 Miss. 429 , 45 So. 14 , it was said, with reference to a statute that did not permit an amendment of the original resolution, that: “The safe time for the property owner to object, if he intends to object, is at the time the law has designated for this when the machinery of government is first put in motion, and not wait until the improvement has been made and the benefits accrued, and then seek to defeat the assessment by finding’ some irregularity in the proceedings leading up t 1928Failure to object is equivalent to consent; and “consent cures error.” In Edwards House Co. v. City of Jackson, 91 Miss. 429 , 45 So. 14 , it was said, with reference to a statute that did not permit an amendment of the original resolution, that: “The safe time for the property owner to object, if he intends to object, is at the time the law has designated for this when the machinery of government is first put in motion, and not wait until the improvement has been made and the benefits accrued, and then seek to defeat the assessment by finding’ some irregularity in the proceedings leading up t | 1 | 1928–1928 |
City of McComb v. Barron
neutral
2 sentences1928Failure to object is equivalent to consent; and “consent cures error.” In Edwards House Co. v. City of Jackson, 91 Miss. 429 , 45 So. 14 , it was said, with reference to a statute that did not permit an amendment of the original resolution, that: “The safe time for the property owner to object, if he intends to object, is at the time the law has designated for this when the machinery of government is first put in motion, and not wait until the improvement has been made and the benefits accrued, and then seek to defeat the assessment by finding’ some irregularity in the proceedings leading up t 1928Failure to object is equivalent to consent; and “consent cures error.” In Edwards House Co. v. City of Jackson, 91 Miss. 429 , 45 So. 14 , it was said, with reference to a statute that did not permit an amendment of the original resolution, that: “The safe time for the property owner to object, if he intends to object, is at the time the law has designated for this when the machinery of government is first put in motion, and not wait until the improvement has been made and the benefits accrued, and then seek to defeat the assessment by finding’ some irregularity in the proceedings leading up t | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.