resolution claim (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

resolution claim in Kansas

5 Kansas opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2024 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Darkisgreen
kan · 2022 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024See State v. Darkis, 314 Kan. 809 , 812-13, 502 P.3d 1045 (2022).

11
Howard G. Dindo v. Harold O. Whitneygreen
ca1 · 1971 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995To hold that Rule 13(a) does not apply when the prior action is settled would completely subvert the Rule’s purpose of bringing about a just and speedy resolution of all the claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction or occurrence.” *900 The First- Circuit agreed with the trial court in this case, and in Dindo v. Whitney, 451 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 1971), the court said: “The bar arising out of Rule 13(a) has been characterized variously.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Brady v. Maryland green
scotus · 1963
1 sentence

2024In Brady, the United States Supreme Court held that prosecutors have a duty to disclose evidence favorable to the accused when "the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution." 373 U.S. at 87 .

12024–2024
Hemphill v. Ford Motor Co. green
kanctapp · 2009
1 sentence

2022App. 2d 726 , 728- 29, 206 P.3d 1 (2009), held a judgment creditor waived its right to appeal the resolution of its claim in arbitration where it accepted payment for the arbitration award.

12022–2022
State v. Hopkins green
kan · 2012
1 sentence

2021Hopkins, 295 Kan. at 581 ; State v. Prebble, 37 Kan.

12021–2021
State v. Prebble green
kanctapp · 2007
1 sentence

2021Hopkins, 295 Kan. at 581 ; State v. Prebble, 37 Kan.

12021–2021

Where else courts name it

TX 62 (1966–2026) CT 51 (1989–2025) CA 44 (1929–2026) IL 34 (1985–2025) PA 33 (1902–2026) NC 25 (1989–2026) FL 21 (1974–2022) OH 18 (1986–2022) MA 12 (1993–2025) MD 12 (1976–2017) MS 11 (1928–2022) WA 11 (2003–2014) MO 11 (1959–2024) OK 11 (1982–2017) NY 11 (1964–2026) NJ 9 (1945–2026) GA 8 (1994–2023) OR 7 (1987–2017) WI 7 (1998–2024) KY 6 (2010–2025) DE 6 (1976–2026) WV 6 (1982–2009) IN 6 (2006–2026) WY 6 (2004–2011) TN 5 (2001–2007) AL 5 (1992–2026) CO 5 (1985–2011) MI 5 (1983–2025) KS 5 (1995–2024) VT 4 (2007–2015) AZ 4 (1975–2024) VA 4 (1982–1999) LA 4 (1989–2021) HI 3 (1994–2016) DC 3 (1978–2013) AK 3 (2008–2024) IA 3 (1986–2016) MT 3 (1998–2017) NE 2 (2001–2006) NV 2 (1995–2000) MN 2 (1990–2016) ID 2 (1987–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check