resolution claim (Delaware) · Go Syfert
← Delaware issues

resolution claim in Delaware

7 Delaware opinions name it 3 courts 1976–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Tricoche v. Stategreen
del · 1987 · cited in 1 Delaware opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016C. § 4334(0), when imposing sentence for a VOP, the Superior Court is authorized to impose any period of incarceration up to and including the balance of the Level V time remaining to be served on the original sentence.8 ln this case, Thompson does not allege, and the record does not reflect, that the VOP sentence imposed on June 10, 2016 exceeded 5 Tricoche v. State, 525 A.2d 151, 154 (Del. 1987); Albanese v. State, 2012 WL 3115480 , at *2 n.2 (Del.

11
Zapata Corp. v. Maldonadogreen
del · 1981 · cited in 1 Delaware opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015See Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado, 430 A.2d 779 (Del.1981).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Genger v. TR INVESTORS, LLC green
del · 2011
1 sentence

2026If the resolution of a claim is not necessary to determine an LLC’s proper manager, “those claims ‘are said to be collateral to the purpose of a [Section 18-110] action and must be raised in a [separate] plenary action.’” Genger, 26 A.3d at 199 (quoting Agranoff v. Miller, 1999 WL 219650 , at *17 (Del. Ch. Apr. 12, 1999)).

12026–2026
Kellner v. AIM Immunotech Inc. green
delch · 2023
1 sentence

2024Corp., 2014 WL 7150465 , at *5 (“The clearest set of cases providing support for enjoining an advance notice bylaw involves a scenario where a board, aware of an imminent proxy contest, imposes or applies an advance notice bylaw so as to make compliance impossible or extremely difficult, thereby thwarting the challenger entirely.”). 200 Kellner, 307 A.3d at 1039-40 & n.353 (finding that Kellner’s AAU disclosures were “false” and “omitted and misrepresented meaningful AAUs,” and that the 2022 AAU disclosures concealed Tudor’s role in the nomination process); Kellner v. AIM ImmunoTech Inc., 2024

12024–2024
Pope Investments LLC v. Marilyn Abrams Living Trust green
del · 2017
1 sentence

2019A. That is correct.”). 144 Tr. 312–13 (Soroka). 145 Tr. 29–30 (Segal). 146 Chicago Bridge, 166 A.3d at 926–27. 36 themselves generate net profit.147 Specifically, according to Tutor Perini, “[w]hether an Exhibit C Offset Claim has generated ‘additional net profit’ is determined by calculating the P&L impact that the resolution of the claim has on the project.”148 Under this construction of Section 2, there is no single formula for determining net profit.

12019–2019
XL Specialty Insurance v. WMI Liquidating Trust green
del · 2014
1 sentence

2014Co., 2014 WL 2199889, at *6 . 68 Separately, the Court notes that it may make sense to defer the resolution of this claim until the conclusion of the current application process, if for no other reason than to permit the parties (and thus the Court) to come to a more informed understanding of what commercially reasonable efforts in this context would require. 22 [Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Prime”)] in New Jersey.”69 This representation was “knowingly or recklessly false and misleading” because the MPT Entities allegedly “intended to and did work with Prime in its attempted acquisition of Chri

12014–2014
Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company v. Mary Lee Rogers Davis and Norman E. Davis green
ca8 · 1960
1 sentence

1976Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company v. Davis, 8 Cir., 277 F.2d 765 (1960); St.

11976–1976

Where else courts name it

TX 65 (1966–2026) CT 55 (1989–2025) CA 45 (1929–2026) IL 34 (1985–2025) PA 33 (1902–2026) NC 28 (1989–2026) FL 21 (1974–2022) OH 18 (1986–2022) MD 12 (1976–2017) MA 12 (1993–2025) WA 11 (2003–2014) MS 11 (1928–2022) MO 11 (1959–2024) OK 11 (1982–2017) NY 11 (1964–2026) NJ 9 (1945–2026) GA 8 (1994–2023) WI 7 (1998–2024) DE 7 (1976–2026) OR 7 (1987–2017) KY 6 (2010–2025) AL 6 (1992–2026) WY 6 (2004–2011) WV 6 (1982–2009) TN 6 (2001–2021) IN 6 (2006–2026) MI 5 (1983–2025) CO 5 (1985–2011) KS 5 (1995–2024) AZ 4 (1975–2024) VT 4 (2007–2015) LA 4 (1989–2021) IA 4 (1986–2026) VA 4 (1982–1999) MT 3 (1998–2017) HI 3 (1994–2016) DC 3 (1978–2013) AK 3 (2008–2024) NE 2 (2001–2006) MN 2 (1990–2016) ID 2 (1987–2014) NV 2 (1995–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check