resolution claim (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

resolution claim in New Jersey

9 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1945–2026 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Oscar Porter (069223)green
nj · 2013 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024However, a defendant is only entitled to an evidentiary hearing if "a prima facie case in support of [PCR]" is demonstrated and "there are material issues of fact that cannot be resolved by reference to the existing record, and a determination that an evidentiary hearing is necessary to resolve the claims for relief." State v. Porter, 216 N.J. 343, 354 (2013) (alteration in original) (quoting R. 3:22-10(b)).

11
Pa. Mfrs. Assn. Ins. Co. v. Gov't Emp. Ins. Co.green
njsuperctappdiv · 1975 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006And if it volunteers payment to the subrogated carrier before the resolution of the claim of the injured party, it cannot assert any right to reduce the available coverage for that injury by the amount of the payment. [Id. at 500, 347 A.2d 5 .] National also relies on the rationale used in Sherman, supra, 251 N.J.Super. at 354, 598 A.2d 242 .

11
Sherman v. Garcia Const., Inc.green
njsuperctappdiv · 1991 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006And if it volunteers payment to the subrogated carrier before the resolution of the claim of the injured party, it cannot assert any right to reduce the available coverage for that injury by the amount of the payment. [Id. at 500, 347 A.2d 5 .] National also relies on the rationale used in Sherman, supra, 251 N.J.Super. at 354, 598 A.2d 242 .

2006And if it volunteers payment to the subrogated carrier before the resolution of the claim of the injured party, it cannot assert any right to reduce the available coverage for that injury by the amount of the payment. [Id. at 500, 347 A.2d 5 .] National also relies on the rationale used in Sherman, supra, 251 N.J.Super. at 354, 598 A.2d 242 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Di Bella v. Di Bella neutral
njsuperctappdiv · 2004
1 sentence

2026Specifically, the court concluded that appointment of the husband as administrator would create untenable conflicts including whether "he [would] sit at [p]laintiff's counsel table as [a]dministrator or defense table in his personal capacity" and "how [would] he as [a]dministrator approve the resolution of a claim against himself." Id. at 353 .

12026–2026
In Re Hoover green
njsuperctappdiv · 1952
1 sentence

2024Our decision to vacate the court's order rejecting the undue-influence claim and remand for reconsideration shall not be construed as expressing an opinion on the claim's merits. 6 We note that in its discussion of Daniel's claim decedent lacked the testamentary capacity to execute the will, the court correctly explained that Daniel had the burden of establishing a lack of testamentary capacity by "clear and convincing evidence," see Hoover's Est., 21 N.J.

12024–2024
Longobardi v. Chubb Ins. Co. of New Jersey green
nj · 1990
1 sentence

2022Id. at 541-42 .

12022–2022
West Jersey Health System v. Croneberger green
njsuperctappdiv · 1994
2 sentences

1998The award was [eventually] reduced to a Superior Court judgment and execution against [the employer] issued." Croneberger, supra, 275 N.J.Super. at 306 , 645 A. 2d 1282 .

1998The award was [eventually] reduced to a Superior Court judgment and execution against [the employer] issued." Croneberger, supra, 275 N.J.Super. at 306 , 645 A. 2d 1282 .

11998–1998
Borough of Fort Lee v. Hudson Terrace Apartments green
njsuperctappdiv · 1980
2 sentences

1981Fort Lee v. Hudson Terrace Ap’ts, 175 N.J.Super. 221, 237 , 417 A.2d 1124 (App.Div. 1980).

1981Fort Lee v. Hudson Terrace Ap’ts, 175 N.J.Super. 221, 237 , 417 A.2d 1124 (App.Div. 1980).

11981–1981
Ambrose v. Cyphers green
nj · 1959
1 sentence

1967Ambrose v. Cyphers, supra, 29 N.J., at pp. 145-146.

11967–1967
Board of Education v. Wheat green
md · 1938
1 sentence

1945Inasmuch as the disbursements from public moneys are, according to the view taken above, in aid or support of the schools thus maintained and operated, and there is no dispute over the proposition that tax moneys are a part thereof, I come to the further conclusion that the resolution is in violation of article 1, paragraph 3, supra. Both the resolution of the board and the statute upon which the resolution is rested are before us for review.

11945–1945

Where else courts name it

TX 62 (1966–2026) CT 51 (1989–2025) CA 44 (1929–2026) IL 34 (1985–2025) PA 33 (1902–2026) NC 25 (1989–2026) FL 21 (1974–2022) OH 18 (1986–2022) MA 12 (1993–2025) MD 12 (1976–2017) MS 11 (1928–2022) WA 11 (2003–2014) MO 11 (1959–2024) OK 11 (1982–2017) NY 11 (1964–2026) NJ 9 (1945–2026) GA 8 (1994–2023) OR 7 (1987–2017) WI 7 (1998–2024) KY 6 (2010–2025) DE 6 (1976–2026) WV 6 (1982–2009) IN 6 (2006–2026) WY 6 (2004–2011) TN 5 (2001–2007) AL 5 (1992–2026) CO 5 (1985–2011) MI 5 (1983–2025) KS 5 (1995–2024) VT 4 (2007–2015) AZ 4 (1975–2024) VA 4 (1982–1999) LA 4 (1989–2021) HI 3 (1994–2016) DC 3 (1978–2013) AK 3 (2008–2024) IA 3 (1986–2016) MT 3 (1998–2017) NE 2 (2001–2006) NV 2 (1995–2000) MN 2 (1990–2016) ID 2 (1987–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check