Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Redding v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See Redding v. State, 309 Ga. 124 n.2 ( 844 SE2d 725 ) (2020) (declining to address the defendant’s other claims of error where the trial court failed to conduct the appropriate analysis regarding the defendant’s constitutional speedy trial claim). 3 And, it is well settled that “a defendant may assert his constitutional right to a speedy trial at any time after he is arrested[.]” State v. Pickett, 288 Ga. 674, 676 (2) (c) (3) ( 706 SE2d 561 ) (2011). 2023See Redding v. State, 309 Ga. 124 n.2 ( 844 SE2d 725 ) (2020) (declining to address the defendant’s other claims of error where the trial court failed to conduct the appropriate analysis regarding the defendant’s constitutional speedy trial claim). 3 And, it is well settled that “a defendant may assert his constitutional right to a speedy trial at any time after he is arrested[.]” State v. Pickett, 288 Ga. 674, 676 (2) (c) (3) ( 706 SE2d 561 ) (2011). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Pickettgreen2 sentences2023See Redding v. State, 309 Ga. 124 n.2 ( 844 SE2d 725 ) (2020) (declining to address the defendant’s other claims of error where the trial court failed to conduct the appropriate analysis regarding the defendant’s constitutional speedy trial claim). 3 And, it is well settled that “a defendant may assert his constitutional right to a speedy trial at any time after he is arrested[.]” State v. Pickett, 288 Ga. 674, 676 (2) (c) (3) ( 706 SE2d 561 ) (2011). 2023See Redding v. State, 309 Ga. 124 n.2 ( 844 SE2d 725 ) (2020) (declining to address the defendant’s other claims of error where the trial court failed to conduct the appropriate analysis regarding the defendant’s constitutional speedy trial claim). 3 And, it is well settled that “a defendant may assert his constitutional right to a speedy trial at any time after he is arrested[.]” State v. Pickett, 288 Ga. 674, 676 (2) (c) (3) ( 706 SE2d 561 ) (2011). | 1 | 1 |
Barnett v. Fullardgreen2 sentences2019Perez admits in his appellate brief that under the terms of the insurance contract, "State Farm ha[d] the unilateral power to investigate, negotiate, and settle any claim or lawsuit for damages payable under the policy's liability coverage." See Barnett v. Fullard , 306 Ga. App. 148 , 153 (3) (b), n. 4, 701 S.E.2d 608 (2010) (acknowledgment of fact in appellate brief "constitutes a binding admission in judicio") In other words, under the insurance contract, Perez, expressly or by implication, authorized State Farm to act for him in the resolution of this claim. 2019Perez admits in his appellate brief that under the terms of the insurance contract, "State Farm ha[d] the unilateral power to investigate, negotiate, and settle any claim or lawsuit for damages payable under the policy's liability coverage." See Barnett v. Fullard , 306 Ga. App. 148 , 153 (3) (b), n. 4, 701 S.E.2d 608 (2010) (acknowledgment of fact in appellate brief "constitutes a binding admission in judicio") In other words, under the insurance contract, Perez, expressly or by implication, authorized State Farm to act for him in the resolution of this claim. | 1 | 1 |
Spray v. Stategreen2 sentences2009OCGA § 17-2-2(a) provides that actions shall be tried "where the crime was committed, except as otherwise provided by law." "As OCGA § 16-10-20 provides for no specific statutory venue, our determination as to the venue for the crime will necessarily hinge on a resolution of the inquiry, `Where was the crime committed?'" Spray v. State, 223 Ga.App. 154, 157 (2), 476 S.E.2d 878 (1996). 2009OCGA § 17-2-2(a) provides that actions shall be tried "where the crime was committed, except as otherwise provided by law." "As OCGA § 16-10-20 provides for no specific statutory venue, our determination as to the venue for the crime will necessarily hinge on a resolution of the inquiry, `Where was the crime committed?'" Spray v. State, 223 Ga.App. 154, 157 (2), 476 S.E.2d 878 (1996). | 1 | 1 |
Suggs v. Stategreen2 sentences2002In reviewing the resolution of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, “we accept the trial court’s factual findings and credibility determinations unless clearly erroneous, but we independently apply the legal principles to the facts. [Cit.]” Suggs v. State, 272 Ga. 85, 88 (4) ( 526 SE2d 347 ) (2000). 2002In reviewing the resolution of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, “we accept the trial court’s factual findings and credibility determinations unless clearly erroneous, but we independently apply the legal principles to the facts. [Cit.]” Suggs v. State, 272 Ga. 85, 88 (4) ( 526 SE2d 347 ) (2000). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Barbergreen2 sentences1996In OCGA § 17-2-2, the general criminal venue statute, subsection (a) provides that actions shall be tried “where the crime was committed, except as otherwise provided by law.” As OCGA § 16-10-20 provides for no specific statutory venue, our determination as to the venue for the crime will necessarily hinge on a resolution of the inquiry, “Where was the crime committed?” In making this determination, our opinion in State v. Barber, 193 Ga. App. 397, 398 ( 388 SE2d 350 ) (1989), holds sway. 1996In OCGA § 17-2-2, the general criminal venue statute, subsection (a) provides that actions shall be tried “where the crime was committed, except as otherwise provided by law.” As OCGA § 16-10-20 provides for no specific statutory venue, our determination as to the venue for the crime will necessarily hinge on a resolution of the inquiry, “Where was the crime committed?” In making this determination, our opinion in State v. Barber, 193 Ga. App. 397, 398 ( 388 SE2d 350 ) (1989), holds sway. | 1 | 1 |
Kusuma v. Metametrix, Inc.green2 sentences1995See Kusuma v. Metametrix, Inc., 191 Ga. App. 255 ( 381 SE2d 322 ) (1989). 1995See Kusuma v. Metametrix, Inc., 191 Ga. App. 255 ( 381 SE2d 322 ) (1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kirbi Ratner v. Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, Lp
neutral
1 sentence2022The resolution of this claim involves the construction of statutes and “[w]e consider questions of statutory construction under a de novo standard of review.” 6 (Citation omitted.) Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. Ratner, 345 Ga. App. 434 , 437 (1) (a) ( 812 SE2d 120 ) (2018). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Board of Regents of the University System v. Daniels
green
2 sentences1994We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Bd. of Regents v. Daniels, 208 Ga. App. 195 ( 430 SE2d 45 ) (1993) to consider that court’s decision in light of our recent opinion in Ga. Dept. of Human Resources v. Poss, 263 Ga. 347 ( 434 SE2d 488 ) (1993). 1994We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Bd. of Regents v. Daniels, 208 Ga. App. 195 ( 430 SE2d 45 ) (1993) to consider that court’s decision in light of our recent opinion in Ga. Dept. of Human Resources v. Poss, 263 Ga. 347 ( 434 SE2d 488 ) (1993). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Georgia Department of Human Resources v. Poss
green
2 sentences1994We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Bd. of Regents v. Daniels, 208 Ga. App. 195 ( 430 SE2d 45 ) (1993) to consider that court’s decision in light of our recent opinion in Ga. Dept. of Human Resources v. Poss, 263 Ga. 347 ( 434 SE2d 488 ) (1993). 1994We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Bd. of Regents v. Daniels, 208 Ga. App. 195 ( 430 SE2d 45 ) (1993) to consider that court’s decision in light of our recent opinion in Ga. Dept. of Human Resources v. Poss, 263 Ga. 347 ( 434 SE2d 488 ) (1993). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.