Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Utah opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Workman v. Henriegreen2 sentences2007After providing the instruction, the court asked defense counsel "if there was anything else he wanted the court to tell the jury," id. at 1037, and *182 defense counsel, while taking exception to the prosecutor's remarks, indicated he did not want the court to say anything further. 2007See id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Holsomback
green
2 sentences2025I think they’re mostly MUJIs.” 2022 UT App 72, ¶ 37 , 513 P.3d 82 . 2025I think they’re mostly MUJIs.” 2022 UT App 72, ¶ 37 , 513 P.3d 82 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Newman v. White Water Whirlpool
green
2 sentences2010Newman v. White Water Whirlpool, 2008 UT 79, ¶ 14 , 197 P.3d 654 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). ¶ 10 In this case, the trial court asked defense counsel on the day of trial if he was ready to proceed and defense counsel gave an affirmative response. 2010Newman v. White Water Whirlpool, 2008 UT 79, ¶ 14 , 197 P.3d 654 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). ¶ 10 In this case, the trial court asked defense counsel on the day of trial if he was ready to proceed and defense counsel gave an affirmative response. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Wach
green
1 sentence2010Given the limited degree to which Defendant was questioned regarding the confession, the hour-long break between the questioning and trial resuming, and the trial court's ruling excluding any further references to the confession, we determine that a motion for a mistrial based on this line of questioning likely would have been futile. 3 See id. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Allred Ex Rel. Jensen v. Allred
green
1 sentence2007Defense counsel responded, "No." A defendant may not obtain plain error review of an alleged instructional error when "counsel, either by statement or act, affirmatively represented to the court that he or she had no objection to the jury instruction." State v. Hamilton, 2008 UT 22, ¶ 54 , 70 P.3d 111 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Hamilton
green
2 sentences2007Defense counsel responded, "No." A defendant may not obtain plain error review of an alleged instructional error when "counsel, either by statement or act, affirmatively represented to the court that he or she had no objection to the jury instruction." State v. Hamilton, 2003 UT 22, ¶ 54 , 70 P.3d 111 . 2007Defense counsel responded, "No." A defendant may not obtain plain error review of an alleged instructional error when "counsel, either by statement or act, affirmatively represented to the court that he or she had no objection to the jury instruction." State v. Hamilton, 2003 UT 22, ¶ 54 , 70 P.3d 111 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.