Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1910–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wilsongreen2 sentences2026After it returned but prior to making its ruling, the court asked defense counsel if he wanted to make any comments for the record, to which defense counsel replied that the proffered testimony about the statements of Lakesha Burns was “being offered to impeach prior testimony by a witness [who is] no longer on the stand as to a collateral matter [which is] not admissible under State v. Wilson [158 Conn. 321, 324, 260 A.2d 571 (1969)].2 The matter of whether or not . . . these statements that are being offered as to what [Lakesha] Burns may or may not have said to . . . 2026After it returned but prior to making its ruling, the court asked defense counsel if he wanted to make any comments for the record, to which defense counsel replied that the proffered testimony about the statements of Lakesha Burns was “being offered to impeach prior testimony by a witness [who is] no longer on the stand as to a collateral matter [which is] not admissible under State v. Wilson [158 Conn. 321, 324, 260 A.2d 571 (1969)].2 The matter of whether or not . . . these statements that are being offered as to what [Lakesha] Burns may or may not have said to . . . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Brewergreen2 sentences2008Even if we were prepared to overlook established case law that arguments about evidence of constancy of accusation have no constitutional implications, our Supreme Court has held that “unpreserved, waived claims, fail under the third prong of [State v.] Golding, [ 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989)].” State v. Fabricatore, 281 Conn. 469, 482 , 915 A.2d 872 (2007); accord State v. Brewer, 283 Conn. 352 , 357 n.7, 360-61, 927 A.2d 825 (2007). 2008Even if we were prepared to overlook established case law that arguments about evidence of constancy of accusation have no constitutional implications, our Supreme Court has held that “unpreserved, waived claims, fail under the third prong of [State v.] Golding, [ 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989)].” State v. Fabricatore, 281 Conn. 469, 482 , 915 A.2d 872 (2007); accord State v. Brewer, 283 Conn. 352 , 357 n.7, 360-61, 927 A.2d 825 (2007). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hall
green
2 sentences2013He responded, “No, your honor.” “Absent some indication to the contrary, a court is entitled to rely on counsel’s representations on behalf of his or her client.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hall, 303 Conn. 527, 536 , 36 A.3d 237 (2012). 2013“Absent some indication to the contrary, a court is entitled to rely on counsel’s representations on behalf of his or her client.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hall, 303 Conn. 527, 536 , 35 A.3d 237 (2012). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Fabricatore
green
2 sentences2011When the court asked defense counsel if he had any objections to that addition to the charge, defense counsel objected, stating twice that the self-defense instruction already had been given as he had requested, and once that he was `satisfied' with the self-defense instruction." (Emphasis added.) Id., at 475, 915 A.2d 872 . 2008Even if we were prepared to overlook established case law that arguments about evidence of constancy of accusation have no constitutional implications, our Supreme Court has held that “unpreserved, waived claims, fail under the third prong of [State v.] Golding, [ 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989)].” State v. Fabricatore, 281 Conn. 469, 482 , 915 A.2d 872 (2007); accord State v. Brewer, 283 Conn. 352 , 357 n.7, 360-61, 927 A.2d 825 (2007). | 2 | 2008–2011 |
Thompson v. Beacon Valley Rubber Co.
green
2 sentences1968In the civil action of Thompson v. Beacon Valley Rubber Co., 56 Conn. 493 , 16 A. 554 , this court was asked to rule that a consignee of goods to be sold on commission could not be guilty of embezzlement under this statute. 1968In the civil action of Thompson v. Beacon Valley Rubber Co., 56 Conn. 493 , 16 A. 554 , this court was asked to rule that a consignee of goods to be sold on commission could not be guilty of embezzlement under this statute. | 2 | 1910–1968 |
State v. Whelan
green
1 sentence2025Under State v. Whelan, [supra, 200 Conn. 743 ], I think it’s admissible,’’ and the prosecutor confirmed that ‘‘[t]he state is offering it pursuant to . . . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Steinmann
green
2 sentences2018The defendant in State v. Steinmann , supra, 20 Conn. App. at 606 , 569 A.2d 557 , argued that his prosecution for simple trespass violated his right to equal protection of the law because "the various trespass statutes create two different classes of trespasser, criminal trespassers and simple trespassers, but only the latter group is denied affirmative defenses and the right to a jury trial." Rejecting the contention that separate classes of trespassers are statutorily created, the Steinmann court stated: "In enacting §§ 53a-107 through 53a-110a, the legislature has defined four degrees of t 2018The defendant in State v. Steinmann , supra, 20 Conn. App. at 606 , 569 A.2d 557 , argued that his prosecution for simple trespass violated his right to equal protection of the law because "the various trespass statutes create two different classes of trespasser, criminal trespassers and simple trespassers, but only the latter group is denied affirmative defenses and the right to a jury trial." Rejecting the contention that separate classes of trespassers are statutorily created, the Steinmann court stated: "In enacting §§ 53a-107 through 53a-110a, the legislature has defined four degrees of t | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Golding
green
2 sentences2008Even if we were prepared to overlook established case law that arguments about evidence of constancy of accusation have no constitutional implications, our Supreme Court has held that “unpreserved, waived claims, fail under the third prong of [State v.] Golding, [ 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989)].” State v. Fabricatore, 281 Conn. 469, 482 , 915 A.2d 872 (2007); accord State v. Brewer, 283 Conn. 352 , 357 n.7, 360-61, 927 A.2d 825 (2007). 2008Even if we were prepared to overlook established case law that arguments about evidence of constancy of accusation have no constitutional implications, our Supreme Court has held that “unpreserved, waived claims, fail under the third prong of [State v.] Golding, [ 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989)].” State v. Fabricatore, 281 Conn. 469, 482 , 915 A.2d 872 (2007); accord State v. Brewer, 283 Conn. 352 , 357 n.7, 360-61, 927 A.2d 825 (2007). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Fagan
green
2 sentences2007The first two Golding requirements involve whether the claim is reviewable, and the second two involve whether there was constitutional error requiring a new trial.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Fagan, 280 Conn. 69, 89-90 , 905 A.2d 1101 (2006). 2007The first two Golding requirements involve whether the claim is reviewable, and the second two involve whether there was constitutional error requiring a new trial.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Fagan, 280 Conn. 69, 89-90 , 905 A.2d 1101 (2006). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Anthony Alexander Campbell v. Bert Rice, Warden
green
1 sentence2004Id., 895-96 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.