Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1900–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Stefaniak
green
2 sentences1998Id. at 1095-96 . 1998Id. at 1095-96 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
In re Kness
neutral
1 sentence1937In re Wadleigh, 82 Cal. 518 , 23 P. 190 ; In re Canfield, 98 Mich. 644 , 57 N. W. 807 ; In re Kness, 58 Kan. *333 705, 50 P. 939 ; State v. Hunter, 124 Iowa 569 , 100 N. W. 510 , 104 Am. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
In re Canfield
neutral
1 sentence1937In re Wadleigh, 82 Cal. 518 , 23 P. 190 ; In re Canfield, 98 Mich. 644 , 57 N. W. 807 ; In re Kness, 58 Kan. *333 705, 50 P. 939 ; State v. Hunter, 124 Iowa 569 , 100 N. W. 510 , 104 Am. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Ex parte Wadleigh
green
2 sentences1937In re Wadleigh, 82 Cal. 518 , 23 P. 190 ; In re Canfield, 98 Mich. 644 , 57 N. W. 807 ; In re Kness, 58 Kan. *333 705, 50 P. 939 ; State v. Hunter, 124 Iowa 569 , 100 N. W. 510 , 104 Am. 1937In re Wadleigh, 82 Cal. 518 , 23 P. 190 ; In re Canfield, 98 Mich. 644 , 57 N. W. 807 ; In re Kness, 58 Kan. *333 705, 50 P. 939 ; State v. Hunter, 124 Iowa 569 , 100 N. W. 510 , 104 Am. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
State ex rel. Davis v. Hunter
green
2 sentences1937In re Wadleigh, 82 Cal. 518 , 23 P. 190 ; In re Canfield, 98 Mich. 644 , 57 N. W. 807 ; In re Kness, 58 Kan. *333 705, 50 P. 939 ; State v. Hunter, 124 Iowa 569 , 100 N. W. 510 , 104 Am. 1937In re Wadleigh, 82 Cal. 518 , 23 P. 190 ; In re Canfield, 98 Mich. 644 , 57 N. W. 807 ; In re Kness, 58 Kan. *333 705, 50 P. 939 ; State v. Hunter, 124 Iowa 569 , 100 N. W. 510 , 104 Am. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
People v. Hagenow
neutral
1 sentence1934People v. Hagenow , supra. In its case in chief the state must prove all of the elements of the crime, including the intent, and need not wait to *Page 161 learn the character of the defense that is to be made by the defendant. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Kent v. Kent
neutral
2 sentences1932Kent v. Kent, 50 Utah 44 , 165 P. 271 ; note 15 L. 1932Kent v. Kent, 50 Utah 44 , 165 P. 271 ; note 15 L. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Hale v. Gladfelder
neutral
1 sentence1900And even if Mrs. Steed did know of this agreement but entered into possession of the property under a claim of ownership, and she and her grantees paid all taxes assessed-against it, and continued in peaceful, open, notorious and adverse possession under a claim of right for a period of seven years before the commencement of the action, and during said time the character of her claim and possession was known to Snow, and the great weight of the evidence shows - such to be the case, she and her grantee acquired title by adverse possession under the statute. , Armstrong v. Kisteed’s Lessee, 5 In | 1 | 1900–1900 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.