method hearing in Louisiana

28 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1923–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Jacksongreen lactapp · 1990 · cited in 4 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2000–2012 2 sentences 2012In State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ [ 17denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 , the case cited by the trial judge, this Court noted that “historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge’s discretion.” (quoting State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	4	4
State v. Varnadogreen la · 1923 · cited in 5 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1981–2013 2 sentences 2002This opinion is intended to address only those assignments of error considered by the court of appeal and does not express any opinion regarding defendant's assignments of error not addressed by the court of appeal on original appeal. [2] Although there was no statutory authorization of defendant's right to request a new trial in State v. Varnado, 154 La. 575 , 97 So. 865 (1923), and all procedural "rules" regarding the motion were derived from case law, we believe this court's pronouncement that the method of hearing motions for new trial is left to the judge and if the motion itself gives hi 2002This opinion is intended to address only those assignments of error considered by the court of appeal and does not express any opinion regarding defendant's assignments of error not addressed by the court of appeal on original appeal. [2] Although there was no statutory authorization of defendant's right to request a new trial in State v. Varnado, 154 La. 575 , 97 So. 865 (1923), and all procedural "rules" regarding the motion were derived from case law, we believe this court's pronouncement that the method of hearing motions for new trial is left to the judge and if the motion itself gives hi	3	5
State v. Richardsongreen lactapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 1 sentence 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	1
State v. Lobatogreen la · 1992 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 1 sentence 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	1
State v. Munozgreen lactapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 1 sentence 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	1
Shell Oil Co. v. Hollywood Marine, Inc.green lactapp · 1997 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998	1	1
Fowler v. Robertsgreen la · 1990 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (43)

Case	Cited	Years
Berry v. Holston Well Service, Inc. red la · 1986 2 sentences 1994The court in Harris observed that in Berry v. Holston , supra the Louisiana Supreme Court attempted to succinctly set forth a method of analysis used to determine statutory employer status. 1990Whenever the statutory employment defense is raised, the method of analysis to be used in resolving the difficult question is the three-level analysis provided in Berry v. Holston Well Service, Inc., 488 So.2d 934 (La.1986).	3	1987–1994
Meaux v. Galtier green la · 2008 2 sentences 2017Meaux v. Galtier, 2007-2474 (La. 1/25/08), 972 So.2d 1137, 1138 . 2017Meaux v. Galtier, 2007-2474 (La. 1/25/08), 972 So.2d 1137, 1138 .	2	2017–2017
State v. Davis green lactapp · 2000 2 sentences 2012In State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ [ 17denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 , the case cited by the trial judge, this Court noted that “historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge’s discretion.” (quoting State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	2	2002–2012
State v. Davis neutral la · 2001 2 sentences 2012In State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ [ 17denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 , the case cited by the trial judge, this Court noted that “historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge’s discretion.” (quoting State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	2	2002–2012
Ortego v. Jurgelsky green lactapp · 1999 2 sentences 2007Ortego v. Jurgelsky, 98-1622, p. 11 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/31/99), 732 So.2d 683, 689 . 2003Ortego v. Jurgelsky, 98-1622 (La.App. 3rd Cir.3/31/99), 732 So.2d 683, 689 .	2	2003–2007
Christakis v. Clipper Construction, L.L.C. neutral lactapp · 2013 1 sentence 2024App. lst Cir. 4/ 26/ 13), 117 So. 3d 168, 171 , writ denied, 13- 1913 ( La. 11/ 8/ 13), 125 So. 3d 454 .	1	2024–2024
Sonnier v. Roberson neutral la · 2013 1 sentence 2024App. lst Cir. 4/ 26/ 13), 117 So. 3d 168, 171 , writ denied, 13- 1913 ( La. 11/ 8/ 13), 125 So. 3d 454 .	1	2024–2024
State v. Thomas neutral lactapp · 2013 1 sentence 2022Id.	1	2022–2022
McGlothlin v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital green la · 2011 1 sentence 2012See \| nMcGlothlin, 10-2775 at 11; 65 So.3d at 1228 .	1	2012–2012
LA. CONSUMERS'LEAGUE, INC. v. La. Public Serv. green la · 1977 1 sentence 2008Consumers' League, 351 So.2d at 131-132 .	1	2008–2008
Gibbs v. Delatte green lactapp · 2005 1 sentence 2007In Gibbs v. Delatte, XXXX-XXXX, p. 12 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/22/05), 927 So.2d 1131, 1138 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/24/06), 926 So.2d 548 , we recognized that one of the legislature's main purposes for imposing the time limitation in La.	1	2007–2007
Reese v. STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY green la · 2004 1 sentence 2007C.C. art. 209, was "to provide for proof of filiation by children or on their behalf; to provide a procedure and time limitations for proceedings to establish filiation; to provide for the method and standard of proof in such actions; and to provide that the failure to institute timely such a proceeding shall bar the claims of the persons covered by the *980 Act[s]." Reese v. State Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 4-5 (La.2/20/04), 866 So.2d 244, 247-248 .	1	2007–2007
Gibbs v. Delatte green la · 2006 1 sentence 2007In Gibbs v. Delatte, XXXX-XXXX, p. 12 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/22/05), 927 So.2d 1131, 1138 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/24/06), 926 So.2d 548 , we recognized that one of the legislature's main purposes for imposing the time limitation in La.	1	2007–2007
State v. Rainey green la · 1999 1 sentence 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	2002–2002
State v. Jones green lactapp · 2000 1 sentence 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	2002–2002
State v. Weiland green lactapp · 1990 1 sentence 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	2002–2002
State v. Holmes green lactapp · 1995 1 sentence 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	2002–2002
STATE EX REL. GLAVIANA v. State neutral la · 2001 1 sentence 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	2002–2002
State v. Oliveaux green la · 1975	1	2002–2002
Quick v. Murphy Oil Co. green lactapp · 1994 1 sentence 2002Quick, 643 So.2d at 1295 .	1	2002–2002
Barnes v. Thames green la · 1991 1 sentence 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	2002–2002
State v. Le neutral lactapp · 1999 2 sentences 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 ( 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	2002–2002
State v. Bean green lactapp · 1991	1	2002–2002
State v. Mims green la · 1993 1 sentence 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	2002–2002
State v. Rainey green lactapp · 1998 1 sentence 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	2002–2002
STATE EX REL. JONES v. State green la · 2001 1 sentence 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	2002–2002
State v. Arvie neutral lactapp · 1986 1 sentence 2002Although LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 852 requires contradictory trial of motions for new trial, "historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge's discretion." State v. Davis, 00-278 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00) , 768 So.2d 201, 208 , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), 795 So.2d 1205 (citing State v. Jackson, 570 So.2d 227, 231 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990)). [19] LAS-C.Cr.P. art. 851(4); McCants, supra ; Arvie, supra ; Bean, supra . [20] Bean, supra . [21] State v. Richardson, 01-239 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/27/01) , 790 So.2d 717, 718 (citing State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 , 1060 (	1	2002–2002
cluster 12493 green ·	1	2001–2001
Anderson v. Oliver green lactapp · 1998	1	2001–2001
Newby v. Miller green scotus · 1998	1	2001–2001
Moore v. City of Westminster green scotus · 1998	1	2001–2001
One Juvenile Male v. United States green scotus · 1998	1	2001–2001
Sentilles Optical Services v. Phillips green lactapp · 1995	1	1998–1998
Persilver v. Louisiana Department of Transportation green lactapp · 1991	1	1994–1994
Carter v. CITY PARISH GOVERNMENT, ETC. green la · 1982	1	1992–1992
Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc. green la · 1988	1	1991–1991
State v. Charles green la · 1977	1	1987–1987
State v. Bias green la · 1978	1	1987–1987
State v. Carpenter green la · 1980	1	1981–1981
State v. Callian neutral la · 1903	1	1923–1923

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 1 (4) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 1:3 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 40:967 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CT 126 (1942–2023) IL 101 (1909–2026) CA 87 (1928–2026) TX 73 (1972–2025) OH 61 (1957–2026) OR 46 (1962–2025) PA 42 (1935–2024) NY 34 (1892–2026) FL 31 (1935–2019) LA 28 (1923–2024) NC 27 (1916–2023) IN 27 (1972–2019) MA 26 (1936–2025) MO 26 (1913–2015) MI 25 (1974–2023) AL 25 (1923–2015) WA 25 (1967–2025) WI 23 (1953–2023) AZ 19 (1964–2025) NJ 17 (1845–2018) WV 14 (1955–2022) NE 14 (1950–2002) TN 13 (1972–2026) MN 12 (1985–2018) GA 11 (1936–2023) NV 10 (1996–2020) MD 10 (1971–2016) ND 9 (1975–2013) IA 9 (1980–2019) OK 8 (1943–2015) CO 8 (1982–2018) SD 7 (1958–2003) AR 7 (1915–2025) RI 7 (1976–2017) MT 6 (1930–2017) WY 6 (1965–1993) VT 6 (1935–2020) ME 5 (1981–2021) KY 5 (1915–2022) NM 5 (1991–2022) HI 4 (1952–2015) UT 4 (1985–2016) KS 3 (1923–2024) VA 3 (2005–2020) AK 2 (1984–1986) DE 2 (2009–2024) ID 2 (1991–1996) NH 2 (2016–2019) DC 2 (1992–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check