17 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1845–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Marc David Manson v. George C. Edwards, Clerk for the City of Detroitgreen2 sentences1976In Manson v. Edwards, supra, 482 F. 2d at 1077 (involving a provision in the Detroit Charter requiring city councilmen to be at least 25 years old), the court noted that "the correct method of analysis for issues of this character" was set forth in Bullock v. Carter . 1976In Manson v. Edwards, supra, 482 F. 2d at 1077 (involving a provision in the Detroit Charter requiring city councilmen to be at least 25 years old), the court noted that "the correct method of analysis for issues of this character” was set forth in Bullock v. Carter. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Michaelsgreen1 sentence2018See State v. Michaels, 264 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Minnick v. Mississippigreen2 sentences2012See, e.g., Minnick, supra, 498 U.S. at 163 , 111 S.Ct. at 496 , 112 L.Ed.2d at 504 (Scalia, J., dissenting); Gregory, supra, 557 S.E.2d at 723 . 2012See, e.g., Minnick, supra, 498 U.S. at 163 , 111 S.Ct. at 496 , 112 L.Ed.2d at 504 (Scalia, J., dissenting); Gregory, supra, 557 S.E.2d at 723 . | 1 | 1 |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of Simmonsgreen2 sentences1999See, e.g., State Farm, supra, 84 N.J. at 34 , 417 A.2d 488 . 1999See, e.g., State Farm, supra, 84 N.J. at 34 , 417 A.2d 488 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Carygreen1 sentence1985To be reliable, the expert's testimony must satisfy the New Jersey standard of acceptability for scientific evidence, which is that the method of analysis used by the expert must have a "sufficient scientific basis to produce uniform and reasonably reliable results and will contribute materially to the ascertainment of the truth." State v. Cavallo, 88 N.J. at 517 [citing State v. Cary, 49 N.J. 343, 352 (1967)]; State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525, 536 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hurdgreen1 sentence1985To be reliable, the expert's testimony must satisfy the New Jersey standard of acceptability for scientific evidence, which is that the method of analysis used by the expert must have a "sufficient scientific basis to produce uniform and reasonably reliable results and will contribute materially to the ascertainment of the truth." State v. Cavallo, 88 N.J. at 517 [citing State v. Cary, 49 N.J. 343, 352 (1967)]; State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525, 536 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harvey v. Essex County Board of Freeholders
green
2 sentences1984Super. 14, 23 , 133 A. 2d 672 (App.Div. 1957), aff'd. 25 N.J. 357 , 136 A. 2d 625 (1957). [ 30 N.J. at 389 ] In Vreeland v. Byrne, 72 N.J. 292 (1977), the method of analyzing such constitutional attacks was succinctly set forth: Briefly restated, the method of analysis is this: we first discern the purpose and object of the enactment. 1981Koons v. Board oí Commissioners of Atlantic City, 135 N.J.Law 329, 333 , 47 A.2d 589 (Sup.Ct.1946) aff’d. per curiam 135 N.J.Law 204 , 50 A.2d 869 (E. & A. 1947); In Re Freygang, 46 N.J.Super. 14, 23 , 133 A.2d 672 (App.Div.1957), aff’d. 25 N.J. 357 , 136 A.2d 625 (1957). [at 389, 153 A.2d 10 ] In Vreeland v. Byrne, 72 N.J. 292 , 370 A.2d 825 (1977), the method of analyzing such constitutional attacks was succinctly set forth: Briefly restated, the method of analysis is this: we first discern the purpose and object of the enactment. | 2 | 1981–1984 |
In Re Freygang
green
2 sentences1984Super. 14, 23 , 133 A. 2d 672 (App.Div. 1957), aff'd. 25 N.J. 357 , 136 A. 2d 625 (1957). [ 30 N.J. at 389 ] In Vreeland v. Byrne, 72 N.J. 292 (1977), the method of analyzing such constitutional attacks was succinctly set forth: Briefly restated, the method of analysis is this: we first discern the purpose and object of the enactment. 1981Koons v. Board oí Commissioners of Atlantic City, 135 N.J.Law 329, 333 , 47 A.2d 589 (Sup.Ct.1946) aff’d. per curiam 135 N.J.Law 204 , 50 A.2d 869 (E. & A. 1947); In Re Freygang, 46 N.J.Super. 14, 23 , 133 A.2d 672 (App.Div.1957), aff’d. 25 N.J. 357 , 136 A.2d 625 (1957). [at 389, 153 A.2d 10 ] In Vreeland v. Byrne, 72 N.J. 292 , 370 A.2d 825 (1977), the method of analyzing such constitutional attacks was succinctly set forth: Briefly restated, the method of analysis is this: we first discern the purpose and object of the enactment. | 2 | 1981–1984 |
Vreeland v. Byrne
green
2 sentences1984Super. 14, 23 , 133 A. 2d 672 (App.Div. 1957), aff'd. 25 N.J. 357 , 136 A. 2d 625 (1957). [ 30 N.J. at 389 ] In Vreeland v. Byrne, 72 N.J. 292 (1977), the method of analyzing such constitutional attacks was succinctly set forth: Briefly restated, the method of analysis is this: we first discern the purpose and object of the enactment. 1981Koons v. Board oí Commissioners of Atlantic City, 135 N.J.Law 329, 333 , 47 A.2d 589 (Sup.Ct.1946) aff’d. per curiam 135 N.J.Law 204 , 50 A.2d 869 (E. & A. 1947); In Re Freygang, 46 N.J.Super. 14, 23 , 133 A.2d 672 (App.Div.1957), aff’d. 25 N.J. 357 , 136 A.2d 625 (1957). [at 389, 153 A.2d 10 ] In Vreeland v. Byrne, 72 N.J. 292 , 370 A.2d 825 (1977), the method of analyzing such constitutional attacks was succinctly set forth: Briefly restated, the method of analysis is this: we first discern the purpose and object of the enactment. | 2 | 1981–1984 |
In Re Application of Freygang
neutral
2 sentences1984Super. 14, 23 , 133 A. 2d 672 (App.Div. 1957), aff'd. 25 N.J. 357 , 136 A. 2d 625 (1957). [ 30 N.J. at 389 ] In Vreeland v. Byrne, 72 N.J. 292 (1977), the method of analyzing such constitutional attacks was succinctly set forth: Briefly restated, the method of analysis is this: we first discern the purpose and object of the enactment. 1984Super. 14, 23 , 133 A. 2d 672 (App.Div. 1957), aff'd. 25 N.J. 357 , 136 A. 2d 625 (1957). [ 30 N.J. at 389 ] In Vreeland v. Byrne, 72 N.J. 292 (1977), the method of analyzing such constitutional attacks was succinctly set forth: Briefly restated, the method of analysis is this: we first discern the purpose and object of the enactment. | 2 | 1981–1984 |
PV Ex Rel. TV v. Camp Jaycee
green
2 sentences2012In P.V. v. Camp Jaycee, 197 N.J. 132, 139-43 , 962 A.2d 453 (2008), the Court held that the method of analysis set forth in sections 6 and 145 of the Restatement (Second) of Conflicts of Laws for identifying the state with the “most significant relationship” to the parties and issues, rather than the “governmental interest” test applied in Heavner and Gantes , should be followed in determining conflicts of law questions in tort actions. 2012In P.V. v. Camp Jaycee, 197 N.J. 132, 139-43 , 962 A.2d 453 (2008), the Court held that the method of analysis set forth in sections 6 and 145 of the Restatement (Second) of Conflicts of Laws for identifying the state with the “most significant relationship” to the parties and issues, rather than the “governmental interest” test applied in Heavner and Gantes , should be followed in determining conflicts of law questions in tort actions. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Commonwealth v. Gregory
green
1 sentence2012See, e.g., Minnick, supra, 498 U.S. at 163 , 111 S.Ct. at 496 , 112 L.Ed.2d at 504 (Scalia, J., dissenting); Gregory, supra, 557 S.E.2d at 723 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Li Fu v. Hong Fu
green
2 sentences2008Thus, New Jersey now adheres to the method of analysis set forth in Restatement sections 6 (Section 6) and 145 (Section 145).” 160 N.J. at 144 , 733 A.2d 1133 (Pollock, j., dissenting). 2008Thus, New Jersey now adheres to the method of analysis set forth in Restatement sections 6 (Section 6) and 145 (Section 145).” 160 N.J. at 144 , 733 A.2d 1133 (Pollock, j., dissenting). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Erny v. Estate of Merola
green
2 sentences2008More recently, in Emy, supra, this Court specifically cited the presumption in section 146 and also identified and applied the section 145 contacts and section 6 principles to resolve a choice-of-law issue. 171 N.J. at 95-97 , 792 A.2d 1208 . 2008More recently, in Emy, supra, this Court specifically cited the presumption in section 146 and also identified and applied the section 145 contacts and section 6 principles to resolve a choice-of-law issue. 171 N.J. at 95-97 , 792 A.2d 1208 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Charles Glueck v. Jonathan Logan, Inc.
green
1 sentence2006Ibid. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Beauchamp v. Amedio
green
2 sentences2006Beauchamp, supra, 164 N.J. at 118-19 , 751 A. 2d 1047 . 2006Beauchamp, supra, 164 N.J. at 118-19 , 751 A. 2d 1047 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Hudson v. United States
green
2 sentences1998Halper.'" Hudson v. United States, 522 U.S. 93 , ____, 118 S.Ct. 488, 491 , 139 L.Ed. 2d 450 (1997). 1998Halper.'" Hudson v. United States, 522 U.S. 93 , ____, 118 S.Ct. 488, 491 , 139 L.Ed. 2d 450 (1997). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Summit Assoc. v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins.
green
1 sentence1991Super. 56 , 550 A. 2d 1235 (App.Div. 1988), where Broadwell was reaffirmed as an appropriate method of analysis. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Cavallo
green
1 sentence1985To be reliable, the expert's testimony must satisfy the New Jersey standard of acceptability for scientific evidence, which is that the method of analysis used by the expert must have a "sufficient scientific basis to produce uniform and reasonably reliable results and will contribute materially to the ascertainment of the truth." State v. Cavallo, 88 N.J. at 517 [citing State v. Cary, 49 N.J. 343, 352 (1967)]; State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525, 536 (1981). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
In Re Albright
green
2 sentences1983In the case of In re Albright, 129 Cal. App. 3d 504 , 181 Cal. Rptr. 84 (D.Ct.App. 1982), the court held that an advance waiver of extradition rights as a condition of being permitted to leave the sentencing state can function as an alternative method of waiver under § 25A of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act. 1983In the case of In re Albright, 129 Cal. App. 3d 504 , 181 Cal. Rptr. 84 (D.Ct.App. 1982), the court held that an advance waiver of extradition rights as a condition of being permitted to leave the sentencing state can function as an alternative method of waiver under § 25A of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Koons v. Board of Commissioners
green
1 sentence1981Koons v. Board oí Commissioners of Atlantic City, 135 N.J.Law 329, 333 , 47 A.2d 589 (Sup.Ct.1946) aff’d. per curiam 135 N.J.Law 204 , 50 A.2d 869 (E. & A. 1947); In Re Freygang, 46 N.J.Super. 14, 23 , 133 A.2d 672 (App.Div.1957), aff’d. 25 N.J. 357 , 136 A.2d 625 (1957). [at 389, 153 A.2d 10 ] In Vreeland v. Byrne, 72 N.J. 292 , 370 A.2d 825 (1977), the method of analyzing such constitutional attacks was succinctly set forth: Briefly restated, the method of analysis is this: we first discern the purpose and object of the enactment. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Phillips v. Borough of East Paterson
green
1 sentence1981Koons v. Board oí Commissioners of Atlantic City, 135 N.J.Law 329, 333 , 47 A.2d 589 (Sup.Ct.1946) aff’d. per curiam 135 N.J.Law 204 , 50 A.2d 869 (E. & A. 1947); In Re Freygang, 46 N.J.Super. 14, 23 , 133 A.2d 672 (App.Div.1957), aff’d. 25 N.J. 357 , 136 A.2d 625 (1957). [at 389, 153 A.2d 10 ] In Vreeland v. Byrne, 72 N.J. 292 , 370 A.2d 825 (1977), the method of analyzing such constitutional attacks was succinctly set forth: Briefly restated, the method of analysis is this: we first discern the purpose and object of the enactment. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Koons v. Bd. of Commissioners, City of Atlantic City
green
1 sentence1981Koons v. Board oí Commissioners of Atlantic City, 135 N.J.Law 329, 333 , 47 A.2d 589 (Sup.Ct.1946) aff’d. per curiam 135 N.J.Law 204 , 50 A.2d 869 (E. & A. 1947); In Re Freygang, 46 N.J.Super. 14, 23 , 133 A.2d 672 (App.Div.1957), aff’d. 25 N.J. 357 , 136 A.2d 625 (1957). [at 389, 153 A.2d 10 ] In Vreeland v. Byrne, 72 N.J. 292 , 370 A.2d 825 (1977), the method of analyzing such constitutional attacks was succinctly set forth: Briefly restated, the method of analysis is this: we first discern the purpose and object of the enactment. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Boult v. Board of Education of Passaic
neutral
1 sentence1981Koons v. Board oí Commissioners of Atlantic City, 135 N.J.Law 329, 333 , 47 A.2d 589 (Sup.Ct.1946) aff’d. per curiam 135 N.J.Law 204 , 50 A.2d 869 (E. & A. 1947); In Re Freygang, 46 N.J.Super. 14, 23 , 133 A.2d 672 (App.Div.1957), aff’d. 25 N.J. 357 , 136 A.2d 625 (1957). [at 389, 153 A.2d 10 ] In Vreeland v. Byrne, 72 N.J. 292 , 370 A.2d 825 (1977), the method of analyzing such constitutional attacks was succinctly set forth: Briefly restated, the method of analysis is this: we first discern the purpose and object of the enactment. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
City of Newark v. Township of Vernon
green
1 sentence1981Judge Evers, in a reported opinion dated April 1, 1980, 1 N.J. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Jackson ex dem. Scofield v. Collins
neutral
1 sentence1845Stat.; 3 Cow. 89 , though it may be contrary to the letter of the statute. “ That such intention is the proper method of inquiry,” say Chief Justice Thompson in 15 John R. 380, H is too well settled to admit of dispute.” Under this act of 1820, the Orphans’ Courts of this state have, since its passage, exercised the power of decreeing sales of lands. | 1 | 1845–1845 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.