8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
ROCKY MOUNTAIN FESTIVALS v. Parsons Corp.green1 sentence2018See Rocky Mountain Festivals, Inc. v. Parsons Corp., 242 P.3d 1067, 1073 (Colo. 2010). | 1 | 1 |
Alamosa-La Jara Water Users Protection Ass'n v. Gouldgreen1 sentence2011The statute establishes that senior surface right holders who divert from streams by "reasonable means"" need not drill wells to satisfy their lawful demand. § 37-92-501(4)(b)(IV); see Alamosa-La Jara, 674 P.2d at 934-36 . . | 1 | 1 |
Prows v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAHgreen1 sentence2006Rather, it introduces the four parts only with the words, “whether initiation of horseplay is a deviation from course of employment depends on.” In Prows v. Industrial Commission, 610 P.2d 1362, 1367 (Utah 1980), the Utah Supreme Court applied the four-part test in Larson’s, stating as follows: By adopting the approach suggested by Larson, this Court does not intend the adoption of a test which by mechanical application will in cases involving horseplay dictate a “correct result.” Indeed, this approach is not susceptible of mechanical application but rather is intended as a method of analysis | 1 | 1 |
Woods v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.green1 sentence2006Similarly, in Woods v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., 114 N.M. 162, 167 , 836 P.2d 81, 86 (N.M.Ct.App.1992), the New Mexico Court of Appeals addressed the four-part test, stating, “After considering these factors, the factfin-der must determine whether the accident occurred during a substantial deviation from the course of employment.” Thus, even if the horseplay was not common or condoned by the employer, the absence of the last two elements does not rule out the possibility that, under the first two elements, the claimant engaged in such minor horseplay that it did not fall outside the scope of t | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Caldwellgreen2 sentences1984See, e.g., Brown v. Caldwell, 231 Ga. 795 , 204 S.E.2d 137 (1974) (inmate grievances must first be raised within the department of corrections and, upon an adverse determination, through the courts in the nature of mandamus or injunction; ha-beas corpus is not available); People ex rel. 1984See, e.g., Brown v. Caldwell, 231 Ga. 795 , 204 S.E.2d 137 (1974) (inmate grievances must first be raised within the department of corrections and, upon an adverse determination, through the courts in the nature of mandamus or injunction; ha-beas corpus is not available); People ex rel. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hensley v. Eckerhart
green
2 sentences2010To this end, we find the method for claim segregation outlined in Hensley v. Eckerhart instructive, though it was developed in a different context. 461 U.S. 424, 434-35 , 103 S.Ct. 1933 , 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983). 2010To this end, we find the method for claim segregation outlined in Hensley v. Eckerhart instructive, though it was developed in a different context. 461 U.S. 424, 434-35 , 103 S.Ct. 1933 , 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Federal Ins. Co. v. CENTURY FED. S. & L.
green
1 sentence2006Similarly, in Woods v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., 114 N.M. 162, 167 , 836 P.2d 81, 86 (N.M.Ct.App.1992), the New Mexico Court of Appeals addressed the four-part test, stating, “After considering these factors, the factfin-der must determine whether the accident occurred during a substantial deviation from the course of employment.” Thus, even if the horseplay was not common or condoned by the employer, the absence of the last two elements does not rule out the possibility that, under the first two elements, the claimant engaged in such minor horseplay that it did not fall outside the scope of t | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Colorado Ass'n of Public Employees v. Board of Regents
green
1 sentence1998We conclude, then, that the Department’s contract with the College, to the extent that that agreement attempted to substitute non-classified employee positions for former classified positions, violated the Civil Service Amendment in essentially the same way that that constitutional provision was violated in Colorado Ass’n of Public Employees v. Board of Regents, supra, and People ex rel. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
People v. District Court for County of Jefferson
green
2 sentences1997Id. at 258-59 , 439 P.2d at 744 . 1997Id. at 258-59 , 439 P.2d at 744 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Snyder v. City of Lakewood
green
2 sentences1982RE-1 v. Ebke, 193 Colo. 40 , 562 P.2d 419 (1977) (school board’s unilateral action in refusing longevity increments to teachers on the basis of a federal wage and price freeze falls outside the scope of Rule 106 and the guidelines in Snyder v. Lakewood, 189 Colo. 421 , 542 P.2d 371 (1975)); Clasby v. Klapper, Colo., 636 P.2d 682 (1981) (the statutory review procedure set forth in section 12-23-120, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 5), was the appropriate and exclusive means of challenging the facial constitutionality of the electricians’ licensing statute upon denial of an application for license re 1982RE-1 v. Ebke, 193 Colo. 40 , 562 P.2d 419 (1977) (school board’s unilateral action in refusing longevity increments to teachers on the basis of a federal wage and price freeze falls outside the scope of Rule 106 and the guidelines in Snyder v. Lakewood, 189 Colo. 421 , 542 P.2d 371 (1975)); Clasby v. Klapper, Colo., 636 P.2d 682 (1981) (the statutory review procedure set forth in section 12-23-120, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 5), was the appropriate and exclusive means of challenging the facial constitutionality of the electricians’ licensing statute upon denial of an application for license re | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Clasby v. Klapper
green
1 sentence1982RE-1 v. Ebke, 193 Colo. 40 , 562 P.2d 419 (1977) (school board’s unilateral action in refusing longevity increments to teachers on the basis of a federal wage and price freeze falls outside the scope of Rule 106 and the guidelines in Snyder v. Lakewood, 189 Colo. 421 , 542 P.2d 371 (1975)); Clasby v. Klapper, Colo., 636 P.2d 682 (1981) (the statutory review procedure set forth in section 12-23-120, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 5), was the appropriate and exclusive means of challenging the facial constitutionality of the electricians’ licensing statute upon denial of an application for license re | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Norby v. City of Boulder
green
2 sentences1982RE-1 v. Ebke, 193 Colo. 40 , 562 P.2d 419 (1977) (school board’s unilateral action in refusing longevity increments to teachers on the basis of a federal wage and price freeze falls outside the scope of Rule 106 and the guidelines in Snyder v. Lakewood, 189 Colo. 421 , 542 P.2d 371 (1975)); Clasby v. Klapper, Colo., 636 P.2d 682 (1981) (the statutory review procedure set forth in section 12-23-120, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 5), was the appropriate and exclusive means of challenging the facial constitutionality of the electricians’ licensing statute upon denial of an application for license re 1982RE-1 v. Ebke, 193 Colo. 40 , 562 P.2d 419 (1977) (school board’s unilateral action in refusing longevity increments to teachers on the basis of a federal wage and price freeze falls outside the scope of Rule 106 and the guidelines in Snyder v. Lakewood, 189 Colo. 421 , 542 P.2d 371 (1975)); Clasby v. Klapper, Colo., 636 P.2d 682 (1981) (the statutory review procedure set forth in section 12-23-120, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 5), was the appropriate and exclusive means of challenging the facial constitutionality of the electricians’ licensing statute upon denial of an application for license re | 1 | 1982–1982 |
JULESBURG SCH. DIST. NO. RE-1, ETC. v. Ebke
green
2 sentences1982RE-1 v. Ebke, 193 Colo. 40 , 562 P.2d 419 (1977) (school board’s unilateral action in refusing longevity increments to teachers on the basis of a federal wage and price freeze falls outside the scope of Rule 106 and the guidelines in Snyder v. Lakewood, 189 Colo. 421 , 542 P.2d 371 (1975)); Clasby v. Klapper, Colo., 636 P.2d 682 (1981) (the statutory review procedure set forth in section 12-23-120, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 5), was the appropriate and exclusive means of challenging the facial constitutionality of the electricians’ licensing statute upon denial of an application for license re 1982RE-1 v. Ebke, 193 Colo. 40 , 562 P.2d 419 (1977) (school board’s unilateral action in refusing longevity increments to teachers on the basis of a federal wage and price freeze falls outside the scope of Rule 106 and the guidelines in Snyder v. Lakewood, 189 Colo. 421 , 542 P.2d 371 (1975)); Clasby v. Klapper, Colo., 636 P.2d 682 (1981) (the statutory review procedure set forth in section 12-23-120, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 5), was the appropriate and exclusive means of challenging the facial constitutionality of the electricians’ licensing statute upon denial of an application for license re | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.