7 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1915–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bennett v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See Bennett v. State, 308 Ark. 393 , 825 S.W.2d 560 (1992). 2025See Bennett v. State, 308 Ark. 393 , 825 S.W.2d 560 (1992). | 2 | 2 |
Prairie Implement Co. v. Circuit Court of Prairie Countygreen2 sentences2016Prairie Implement, 311 Ark. at 202-03 , 844 S.W.2d at 300 (emphasis supplied). 1 Our holding in Prairie Implement could not be clearer — a writ of prohibition is the proper method to challenge improper venue, unless the resolution of that' issue depends on disputed facts. 2016Prairie Implement, 311 Ark. at 202-03 , 844 S.W.2d at 300 (emphasis supplied). 1 Our holding in Prairie Implement could not be clearer — a writ of prohibition is the proper method to challenge improper venue, unless the resolution of that' issue depends on disputed facts. | 1 | 1 |
Asbury Automotive Used Car Center, L.L.C. v. Broshgreen2 sentences2006See Showmethemoney Check Cashers, Inc. v. Williams, 342 Ark. 112 , 27 S.W.3d 361 (2000); See also Asbury Automotive Used Car Center, L.L.C. v. Brosh, 364 Ark. 386 , 220 S.W.3d 637 (2005). 2006See Showmethemoney Check Cashers, Inc. v. Williams, 342 Ark. 112 , 27 S.W.3d 361 (2000); See also Asbury Automotive Used Car Center, L.L.C. v. Brosh, 364 Ark. 386 , 220 S.W.3d 637 (2005). | 1 | 1 |
Showmethemoney Check Cashers, Inc. v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2006See Showmethemoney Check Cashers, Inc. v. Williams, 342 Ark. 112 , 27 S.W.3d 361 (2000); See also Asbury Automotive Used Car Center, L.L.C. v. Brosh, 364 Ark. 386 , 220 S.W.3d 637 (2005). 2006See Showmethemoney Check Cashers, Inc. v. Williams, 342 Ark. 112 , 27 S.W.3d 361 (2000); See also Asbury Automotive Used Car Center, L.L.C. v. Brosh, 364 Ark. 386 , 220 S.W.3d 637 (2005). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. State
neutral
2 sentences2020In the Rule 37 petition, appellant argued that his counsel was ineffective for failing “to adequately examine Detective Hanna to point out that his illustrations admitted as Exhibit 34 did not correspond to his testimony that the same method of analysis is applied to all cell site location information analyses when his illustrations used different shapes, different angles, appeared to cover vastly different areas, and the length of the legs of the illustrated triangles radiated at different lengths from the towers.” There was no argument made in the petition for postconviction relief that appe 2020App. 58 , 569 S.W.3d 361 . 16 See Hogan v. State, 2013 Ark. 223 . 4 ineffective assistance for failing to object to Detective Hanna’s technical cell-tower testimony despite not having been admitted as an expert witness. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Desoto Gathering Co. v. Ramsey
green
1 sentence2016Accordingly, we will consider issuing the writ in this case. 13 Cite as 2016 Ark. 22 Prairie Implement, 311 Ark. at 202–03, 844 S.W.2d at 300 (emphasis supplied).1 Our holding in Prairie Implement could not be clearer—a writ of prohibition is the proper method to challenge improper venue, unless the resolution of that issue depends on disputed facts. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences1988Today’s decision will do more than merely chill the use of peremptory challenges by the prosecution, it effectively shackles the ability to exercise a method of challenge traditionally “viewed as one means of assuring the selection of a qualified and unbiased jury . . . .” Id. 1988Today's decision will do more than merely chill the use of peremptory challenges by the prosecution, it effectively shackles the ability to exercise a method of challenge traditionally "viewed as one means of assuring the selection of a qualified and unbiased jury...." Id. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Beavers v. State
neutral
1 sentence1915In the case of Beavers v. State, 60 Ark. 124 , the court held that an action by the Attorney General in the nature of quo warranto proceedings against 'the directors of a school district is a proper method to test the legality of 'the organization of the school district. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.