26 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Rothgreen2 sentences2010He must, instead, have a legitimate claim of entitlement to it.” Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 561 (1972). 2010He must, instead, have a legitimate claim of entitlement to it.” Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 561 (1972). | 5 | 10 |
Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complexgreen2 sentences2001He must, instead have a legitimate claim to entitlement to it." Greenholtz, 442 U.S. at 7 , 99 S.Ct. at 2103-04 (1979) (quoting Bd. of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 ). 2001He must, instead have a legitimate claim to entitlement to it." Greenholtz, 442 U.S. at 7 , 99 S.Ct. at 2103-04 (1979) (quoting Bd. of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 ). | 4 | 5 |
State v. Coassologreen2 sentences2020State v. Coassolo, 136 Idaho 138, 143 , 30 P.3d 293, 298 (2001). 2020State v. Coassolo, 136 Idaho 138, 143 , 30 P.3d 293, 298 (2001). | 2 | 2 |
Hill v. American Family Mutual Insurancegreen2 sentences2024See Hill, 150 Idaho at 627–30, 249 P.3d at 820–23 (exhaustion clause in insurance policy was void under public policy because it prevented insured person from obtaining a legitimate claim); Eastman, 164 Idaho at 15, 423 P.3d at 436 (non-owned vehicle exclusion in insurance policy was void under public policy considerations as the exclusion prevented insured person from collecting a legitimate claim); and Pena, 169 Idaho at 738–39, 503 P.3d at 209–10 (offset provision in insurance policy created illusory coverage and prevented insured person from receiving the full benefit of the policy). 2024See Hill, 150 Idaho at 627–30, 249 P.3d at 820–23 (exhaustion clause in insurance policy was void under public policy because it prevented insured person from obtaining a legitimate claim); Eastman, 164 Idaho at 15, 423 P.3d at 436 (non-owned vehicle exclusion in insurance policy was void under public policy considerations as the exclusion prevented insured person from collecting a legitimate claim); and Pena, 169 Idaho at 738–39, 503 P.3d at 209–10 (offset provision in insurance policy created illusory coverage and prevented insured person from receiving the full benefit of the policy). | 1 | 1 |
Sabinson v. Trustees of Dartmouth Collegegreen1 sentence2024See Cowart v. Widener, 697 S.E.2d 779, 788 (Ga. 2010); Sabinson v. Trustees of Dartmouth Coll., 999 A.2d 380, 387 (N.H. 2010); Hedlund v. State, 930 N.W.2d 707 (Iowa 2019), as amended (Sept. 10, 2019); Susie v. Fam. | 1 | 1 |
Eastman v. Farmers Insurancegreen1 sentence2024See Hill, 150 Idaho at 627–30, 249 P.3d at 820–23 (exhaustion clause in insurance policy was void under public policy because it prevented insured person from obtaining a legitimate claim); Eastman, 164 Idaho at 15, 423 P.3d at 436 (non-owned vehicle exclusion in insurance policy was void under public policy considerations as the exclusion prevented insured person from collecting a legitimate claim); and Pena, 169 Idaho at 738–39, 503 P.3d at 209–10 (offset provision in insurance policy created illusory coverage and prevented insured person from receiving the full benefit of the policy). | 1 | 1 |
Cowart v. Widenergreen1 sentence2024See Cowart v. Widener, 697 S.E.2d 779, 788 (Ga. 2010); Sabinson v. Trustees of Dartmouth Coll., 999 A.2d 380, 387 (N.H. 2010); Hedlund v. State, 930 N.W.2d 707 (Iowa 2019), as amended (Sept. 10, 2019); Susie v. Fam. | 1 | 1 |
Lake v. Newcombgreen2 sentences2013As this Court has previously held, “Idaho law provides a number of avenues by which a convicted defendant may challenge a sentence as violating the Eighth Amendment; a habeas corpus action is not one of them.” Lake v. Newcomb, 140 Idaho 190, 196 , 90 P.3d 1272, 1278 (Ct. App. 2004). 2013As this Court has previously held, “Idaho law provides a number of avenues by which a convicted defendant may challenge a sentence as violating the Eighth Amendment; a habeas corpus action is not one of them.” Lake v. Newcomb, 140 Idaho 190, 196 , 90 P.3d 1272, 1278 (Ct. App. 2004). | 1 | 1 |
Moran v. Burbinegreen2 sentences2001See id. citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 556 (1972). 2001See id. citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 556 (1972). | 1 | 1 |
Powers v. Canyon Countygreen2 sentences1998See, e.g., Powers v. Canyon County, 108 Idaho 967 , 703 P.2d 1342 , (1985) (a valid statutory scheme requiring county aid to indigents creates a legitimate claim of entitlement to property). 1998See, e.g., Powers v. Canyon County, 108 Idaho 967 , 703 P.2d 1342 , (1985) (a valid statutory scheme requiring county aid to indigents creates a legitimate claim of entitlement to property). | 1 | 1 |
Loebeck v. Idaho State Board of Educationgreen2 sentences1975Compare Loebeck v. Idaho State Board of Education, 96 Idaho 459 , 530 P.2d 1149 (1975). 1975Compare Loebeck v. Idaho State Board of Education, 96 Idaho 459 , 530 P.2d 1149 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial Council
green
2 sentences2020“A deprivation of property encompasses claims where there is a legitimate claim or entitlement to the asserted benefit under either state or federal law.” Union Bank, 163 Idaho at 317, 413 P.3d at 418 (quoting Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial Council, 136 Idaho 63 , 72–73, 28 P.3d 1006 , 1015–16 (2001)). 2020“A deprivation of property encompasses claims where there is a legitimate claim or entitlement to the asserted benefit under either state or federal law.” Union Bank, 163 Idaho at 317, 413 P.3d at 418 (quoting Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial Council, 136 Idaho 63 , 72–73, 28 P.3d 1006 , 1015–16 (2001)). | 4 | 2014–2020 |
Larry R. Hedlund v. State of Iowa
green
1 sentence2024See Cowart v. Widener, 697 S.E.2d 779, 788 (Ga. 2010); Sabinson v. Trustees of Dartmouth Coll., 999 A.2d 380, 387 (N.H. 2010); Hedlund v. State, 930 N.W.2d 707 (Iowa 2019), as amended (Sept. 10, 2019); Susie v. Fam. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Gagliardi v. Village Of Pawling
green
1 sentence2023Then, in Gagliardi v. Village of Pawling, 18 F.3d 188 (2d Cir. 1994), the Gagliardis filed a section 1983 claim against Pawling alleging the City violated their substantive and procedural due process rights in processing a development request for a neighborhood plastics factory. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Burch v. Smathers
green
1 sentence2023Id. (emphasis in original). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Shanks v. Dressel
green
1 sentence2023The Ninth Circuit rejected the neighborhood group’s argument, explaining the group “does not have a legitimate claim of entitlement to the denial of the [developer’s] permit.” Id. at 1091 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Union Bank, N.A. v. JV L.L.C.
green
1 sentence2020“A deprivation of property encompasses claims where there is a legitimate claim or entitlement to the asserted benefit under either state or federal law.” Union Bank, 163 Idaho at 317, 413 P.3d at 418 (quoting Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial Council, 136 Idaho 63 , 72–73, 28 P.3d 1006 , 1015–16 (2001)). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Spencer v. Kootenai County
green
2 sentences2017Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial Council , 136 Idaho 63 , 72, 28 P.3d 1006 , 1015 (2001). "[A]n individual must be provided with notice and an opportunity to be heard." Spencer v. Kootenai Cnty. , 145 Idaho 448 , 454, 180 P.3d 487 , 493 (2008). 2017Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial Council , 136 Idaho 63 , 72, 28 P.3d 1006 , 1015 (2001). "[A]n individual must be provided with notice and an opportunity to be heard." Spencer v. Kootenai Cnty. , 145 Idaho 448 , 454, 180 P.3d 487 , 493 (2008). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Harkness v. City of Burley
green
2 sentences1994Rather, they are created and their dimensions are defined by existing rules or understandings that stem from an independent source such as state law — rules or understandings that secure certain benefits and that support claims of entitlement to those benefits.” 110 Idaho at 355-56 , 715 P.2d at 1285 -86 (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). 1994Rather, they are created and their dimensions are defined by existing rules or understandings that stem from an independent source such as state law — rules or understandings that secure certain benefits and that support claims of entitlement to those benefits.” 110 Idaho at 355-56 , 715 P.2d at 1285 -86 (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Goldberg v. Kelly
green
2 sentences1985While a valid statutory scheme requiring county aid to indigents creates a legitimate claim of entitlement to property, see Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970), the entitlement to aid is not a fundamental right. 1985While a valid statutory scheme requiring county aid to indigents creates a legitimate claim of entitlement to property, see Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970), the entitlement to aid is not a fundamental right. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.