availability defense in Oregon

22 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1951–2023 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Olmsteadgreen or · 1990 · cited in 2 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 1993–2004 2 sentences 2004In this situation, an offer would give us no additional information that bears on the legal question of the availability of the defense. “* * * When the trial court excludes an entire class of evidence by declaring, in advance, that it is inadmissible as a matter of law, the ruling renders a further offer futile.” Olmstead, 310 Or at 461 (emphasis in original). 2004The court said, “[i]n this situation, an offer would give us no additional information that bears on the legal question of the availability of the defense.” Id. (emphasis in original).	2	2
United States v. Demico Boothegreen ca6 · 2003 · cited in 2 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2004–2011 2 sentences 2011As support for that statement, we referred to Rogers v. United States, 340 US 367, 374 , 71 S Ct 438 , 95 L Ed 344 (1951), and U.S. v. Boothe, 335 F3d 522, 525 (6th Cir 2003), cert den, 541 US 975 (2004). 2004Rogers v. United States, 340 US 367, 374 , 71 S Ct 438 , 95 L Ed 344 (1951); U S. v. Boothe, 335 F3d 522, 525 (6th Cir 2003).	1	2
State v. Meisergreen orctapp · 2023 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023 1 sentence 2023That is so because, as discussed below, see 323 Or App at 684-85, the legislature in ORS 161.295(2) expressly imposed policy-based limitations on the availability of the defense.	1	1
State v. Turnidgegreen or · 2016 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023 1 sentence 2023See Turnidge (S059155), 359 Or at 471 (explaining that legal or proximate cause, in contrast to actual cause, or cause in fact, “expresses a pol- icy judgment as to whether conduct that factually caused harm should result in liability or responsibility” (emphasis in original)).	1	1
Black v. Arizalagreen orctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 1 sentence 2014In addition, the Oregon Supreme Court has signaled the availability of the doctrine and has expressly approved a court’s authority to decline jurisdiction through enforcement of a forum-selection clause in a contract, Reeves, 262 Or at 96-101 , which “is close in concept to forum non conveniens,” Black, 182 Or App at 38 (Armstrong, J., concurring).	1	1
State v. Wimbergreen or · 1992 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 2 sentences 2013See State v. Wimber, 315 Or 103,114-15 , 843 P2d 424 (1992) (holding that an amendment to an indictment is prejudicial where it changes the availability of a defense). 2013See State v. Wimber, 315 Or 103,114-15 , 843 P2d 424 (1992) (holding that an amendment to an indictment is prejudicial where it changes the availability of a defense).	1	1
State v. Pachmayrgreen or · 2008 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 1 sentence 2013Relying on Pachmayr , the state argues that a variance is only prejudicial when it “eliminates an independent defense, such as self-defense.” 344 Or at 495 (emphasis added).	1	1
Empire Wholesale Lumber Co. v. Meyersgreen orctapp · 2004 · cited in 1 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011 1 sentence 2011See ORS 19.350. 7 In Empire Wholesale Lumber Co., we stated, without textual elaboration, that “[t]he determination of the availability of the privilege is committed to the discretion of the trial court.” 192 Or App at 226 (emphasis added).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (25)

Case	Cited	Years
Rogers v. United States green scotus · 1951 2 sentences 2011As support for that statement, we referred to Rogers v. United States, 340 US 367, 374 , 71 S Ct 438 , 95 L Ed 344 (1951), and U.S. v. Boothe, 335 F3d 522, 525 (6th Cir 2003), cert den, 541 US 975 (2004). 2011As support for that statement, we referred to Rogers v. United States, 340 US 367, 374 , 71 S Ct 438 , 95 L Ed 344 (1951), and U.S. v. Boothe, 335 F3d 522, 525 (6th Cir 2003), cert den, 541 US 975 (2004).	2	2004–2011
Lowell v. Wright green or · 2022 1 sentence 2022Although plaintiff Cite as 369 Or 806 (2022) 809 argues that a speaker’s motive may affect the availability of the defense, an argument that we reject, neither party has asked this court to overrule Neumann’s holding.	1	2022–2022
Benitez-Chacon v. State green orctapp · 2001 1 sentence 2021Benitez-Chacon, 178 Or App at 357 .	1	2021–2021
Reeves v. Chem Industrial Company green or · 1972 1 sentence 2014In addition, the Oregon Supreme Court has signaled the availability of the doctrine and has expressly approved a court’s authority to decline jurisdiction through enforcement of a forum-selection clause in a contract, Reeves, 262 Or at 96-101 , which “is close in concept to forum non conveniens,” Black, 182 Or App at 38 (Armstrong, J., concurring).	1	2014–2014
Faconti v. Potter, Postmaster General green scotus · 2004 1 sentence 2011As support for that statement, we referred to Rogers v. United States, 340 US 367, 374 , 71 S Ct 438 , 95 L Ed 344 (1951), and U.S. v. Boothe, 335 F3d 522, 525 (6th Cir 2003), cert den, 541 US 975 (2004).	1	2011–2011
Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc. green or · 1983 1 sentence 2009Davis said nothing to change the availability of that claim: “We emphasize that the holding of this case in no way limits the remedies which this court has repeatedly recognized, remedies often referred to as constructive trust, restitution, quasi contract or unjust enrichment.” Id. at 479 n 9 (emphasis added).	1	2009–2009
Alza Corp. v. Lehman Development Corp. green orctapp · 1999 2 sentences 2004Our analysis of the summary judgment evidentiary record under ORS 701.065(1) and (2) (1999) is informed by our decision in Alza Corp. v. Lehman Development Corp., 162 Or App 128 , 986 P2d 59 (1999), in which we considered an earlier version of the statute. 6 In Alza, we held that the text and context of the statute “require a legal determination by the trial court of the availability of a defense under ORS 701.065(1) [(1995)] * * Id. at 132 . 2004Our analysis of the summary judgment evidentiary record under ORS 701.065(1) and (2) (1999) is informed by our decision in Alza Corp. v. Lehman Development Corp., 162 Or App 128 , 986 P2d 59 (1999), in which we considered an earlier version of the statute. 6 In Alza, we held that the text and context of the statute “require a legal determination by the trial court of the availability of a defense under ORS 701.065(1) [(1995)] * * Id. at 132 .	1	2004–2004
State v. Hanson green orctapp · 1973 1 sentence 1996In that case, the state indicted the defendants for first-degree robbery: “[They] * * * did unlawfully and knowingly threaten the immediate use of physical force upon [the victim], by being armed with a deadly weapon, to-wit: a knife, and did 242 attempt to use said deadly weapon to threaten the * * victim[.]” 14 Or App at 588 .	1	1996–1996
State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Anderson neutral orctapp · 1993 1 sentence 1995Id. at 655 .	1	1995–1995
Mosley v. Portland School District No. 1J green or · 1992 1 sentence 1993Accordingly, the court did not reach the issue of “whether the availability of the immunity defense under ORS 30.265(3)(c) may at times depend on factual questions that properly could be submitted to a jury.” 315 Or at 94 .	1	1993–1993
State v. Benton green orctapp · 1990 2 sentences 1991Although we said in State v. Benton, 101 Or App 386 , 790 P2d 1191 , adhered to 102 Or App 585 , 795 P2d 601 , rev allowed 310 Or 475 (1990), that we did not need to reach arguments regarding the availability of the privilege in a civil contempt proceeding, the defendant in that case did not face a possible criminal prosecution in which his testimony might be used against him. 1991Although we said in State v. Benton, 101 Or App 386 , 790 P2d 1191 , adhered to 102 Or App 585 , 795 P2d 601 , rev allowed 310 Or 475 (1990), that we did not need to reach arguments regarding the availability of the privilege in a civil contempt proceeding, the defendant in that case did not face a possible criminal prosecution in which his testimony might be used against him.	1	1991–1991
State v. Benton green orctapp · 1990 2 sentences 1991Although we said in State v. Benton, 101 Or App 386 , 790 P2d 1191 , adhered to 102 Or App 585 , 795 P2d 601 , rev allowed 310 Or 475 (1990), that we did not need to reach arguments regarding the availability of the privilege in a civil contempt proceeding, the defendant in that case did not face a possible criminal prosecution in which his testimony might be used against him. 1991Although we said in State v. Benton, 101 Or App 386 , 790 P2d 1191 , adhered to 102 Or App 585 , 795 P2d 601 , rev allowed 310 Or 475 (1990), that we did not need to reach arguments regarding the availability of the privilege in a civil contempt proceeding, the defendant in that case did not face a possible criminal prosecution in which his testimony might be used against him.	1	1991–1991
State v. Jancsek green or · 1986 2 sentences 1988State v. Jancsek, 302 Or 270, 275 , 730 P2d 14 (1986). 1988State v. Jancsek, 302 Or 270, 275 , 730 P2d 14 (1986).	1	1988–1988
Rogers v. Saylor green or · 1988 2 sentences 1988Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. ___ , 108 S.Ct. 2302 , 101 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988); Martinez v. California, 444 U.S. 277 , 284 n. 8, 100 S.Ct. 553 , 558 n. 8, 62 L.Ed.2d 481 (1980); Rogers v. Saylor, 306 Or. 267 , 760 P.2d 232 (1988). 1988Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. ___ , 108 S.Ct. 2302 , 101 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988); Martinez v. California, 444 U.S. 277 , 284 n. 8, 100 S.Ct. 553 , 558 n. 8, 62 L.Ed.2d 481 (1980); Rogers v. Saylor, 306 Or. 267 , 760 P.2d 232 (1988).	1	1988–1988
Felder v. Casey green scotus · 1988 2 sentences 1988Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. ___ , 108 S.Ct. 2302 , 101 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988); Martinez v. California, 444 U.S. 277 , 284 n. 8, 100 S.Ct. 553 , 558 n. 8, 62 L.Ed.2d 481 (1980); Rogers v. Saylor, 306 Or. 267 , 760 P.2d 232 (1988). 1988Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. ___ , 108 S.Ct. 2302 , 101 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988); Martinez v. California, 444 U.S. 277 , 284 n. 8, 100 S.Ct. 553 , 558 n. 8, 62 L.Ed.2d 481 (1980); Rogers v. Saylor, 306 Or. 267 , 760 P.2d 232 (1988).	1	1988–1988
Martinez v. California green scotus · 1980 2 sentences 1988Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. ___ , 108 S.Ct. 2302 , 101 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988); Martinez v. California, 444 U.S. 277 , 284 n. 8, 100 S.Ct. 553 , 558 n. 8, 62 L.Ed.2d 481 (1980); Rogers v. Saylor, 306 Or. 267 , 760 P.2d 232 (1988). 1988Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. ___ , 108 S.Ct. 2302 , 101 L.Ed.2d 123 (1988); Martinez v. California, 444 U.S. 277 , 284 n. 8, 100 S.Ct. 553 , 558 n. 8, 62 L.Ed.2d 481 (1980); Rogers v. Saylor, 306 Or. 267 , 760 P.2d 232 (1988).	1	1988–1988
In Re GAULT green scotus · 1967 2 sentences 1980The availability of the privilege does not 760 depend "upon the type of proceeding in which it is invoked but upon the nature of the statement or admission and the exposure it invites.” In re Gault, 387 US 1, 49 , 87 S Ct 1428 , 18 L Ed 2d 527 (1967). 1980The availability of the privilege does not 760 depend "upon the type of proceeding in which it is invoked but upon the nature of the statement or admission and the exposure it invites.” In re Gault, 387 US 1, 49 , 87 S Ct 1428 , 18 L Ed 2d 527 (1967).	1	1980–1980
McBride v. Magnuson green or · 1978 2 sentences 1978McBride v. Magnuson, 282 Or 433 , 578 P2d 1259 (1978); Hulen v. City of Hermiston, 30 Or App 1141, 1144 , 569 P2d 665 (1977); Leonard v. Jackson, 6 Or App 613 , 488 P2d 838 rev den (1971). 1978McBride v. Magnuson, 282 Or 433 , 578 P2d 1259 (1978); Hulen v. City of Hermiston, 30 Or App 1141, 1144 , 569 P2d 665 (1977); Leonard v. Jackson, 6 Or App 613 , 488 P2d 838 rev den (1971).	1	1978–1978
Hulen v. City of Hermiston green orctapp · 1977 2 sentences 1978McBride v. Magnuson, 282 Or 433 , 578 P2d 1259 (1978); Hulen v. City of Hermiston, 30 Or App 1141, 1144 , 569 P2d 665 (1977); Leonard v. Jackson, 6 Or App 613 , 488 P2d 838 rev den (1971). 1978McBride v. Magnuson, 282 Or 433 , 578 P2d 1259 (1978); Hulen v. City of Hermiston, 30 Or App 1141, 1144 , 569 P2d 665 (1977); Leonard v. Jackson, 6 Or App 613 , 488 P2d 838 rev den (1971).	1	1978–1978
Leonard v. Jackson neutral orctapp · 1971 2 sentences 1978McBride v. Magnuson, 282 Or 433 , 578 P2d 1259 (1978); Hulen v. City of Hermiston, 30 Or App 1141, 1144 , 569 P2d 665 (1977); Leonard v. Jackson, 6 Or App 613 , 488 P2d 838 rev den (1971). 1978McBride v. Magnuson, 282 Or 433 , 578 P2d 1259 (1978); Hulen v. City of Hermiston, 30 Or App 1141, 1144 , 569 P2d 665 (1977); Leonard v. Jackson, 6 Or App 613 , 488 P2d 838 rev den (1971).	1	1978–1978
Boykin v. Ott green orctapp · 1972 2 sentences 1977In Boykin v. Ott, 10 Or App 210 , 498 P2d 815 , Sup Ct review denied (1972), appeal dismissed 411 US 912 (1973), we stated due process requires that prior to any suspension the licensee be given notice of intent to suspend and notice of the availability of a hearing and, if requested a hearing appropriate under the circumstances prior to any suspension. 1977In Boykin v. Ott, 10 Or App 210 , 498 P2d 815 , Sup Ct review denied (1972), appeal dismissed 411 US 912 (1973), we stated due process requires that prior to any suspension the licensee be given notice of intent to suspend and notice of the availability of a hearing and, if requested a hearing appropriate under the circumstances prior to any suspension.	1	1977–1977
Hutter v. Korzen green scotus · 1973 1 sentence 1977In Boykin v. Ott, 10 Or App 210 , 498 P2d 815 , Sup Ct review denied (1972), appeal dismissed 411 US 912 (1973), we stated due process requires that prior to any suspension the licensee be given notice of intent to suspend and notice of the availability of a hearing and, if requested a hearing appropriate under the circumstances prior to any suspension.	1	1977–1977
Floyd v. Motor Vehicles Division green orctapp · 1976	1	1977–1977
William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. Hutchins green scotus · 1907	1	1951–1951
Johnson v. Feskens green or · 1934	1	1951–1951

Where else courts name it

NY 129 (1892–2026) PA 101 (1947–2026) CA 74 (1938–2026) CT 49 (1947–2024) FL 38 (1916–2023) NJ 35 (1930–2024) TX 32 (1920–2023) MI 30 (1951–2023) OH 28 (1985–2025) IL 27 (1912–2026) IN 27 (1978–2026) AL 26 (1913–2025) OR 22 (1951–2023) WA 21 (1966–2026) MA 19 (1975–2020) DE 19 (1957–2025) MD 19 (1962–2026) MN 19 (1953–2026) VT 16 (1963–2024) IA 15 (1975–2023) NC 14 (1941–2020) KS 13 (1961–2024) CO 13 (1973–2021) DC 13 (1973–2026) WI 11 (1957–2025) VA 11 (1956–2024) TN 11 (1987–2024) LA 11 (1971–2017) MT 11 (1976–2018) WY 10 (1972–2010) WV 10 (1989–2021) MO 10 (1970–2023) ME 9 (1977–2022) UT 9 (1982–2022) NM 9 (1978–2020) GA 8 (1994–2020) RI 8 (1937–2007) NH 7 (1979–2007) AR 6 (1972–2021) AZ 6 (1962–2016) HI 5 (1962–2023) ID 4 (1961–2025) SC 4 (1951–2007) NE 3 (1947–2014) KY 3 (2017–2024) SD 3 (1981–2020) NV 3 (1994–2011) OK 2 (2014–2014) AK 2 (1980–1992)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check