Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Springer v. State Department of Employment Securitygreen2 sentences1996See Springer, 120 N.H. at 523 , 418 A.2d at 1279 . 1996See Springer, 120 N.H. at 523 , 418 A.2d at 1279 . | 1 | 1 |
New York v. Quarlesgreen2 sentences1994Acknowledging Quarles’ response to be a product of custodial interrogation, the Court held that “on these facts there is a ‘public safety’ exception to the requirement that Miranda warnings be given before a suspect’s answers may be admitted into evidence, and that the availability of that exception does not depend upon the motivation of the individual officers involved.” Id. at 655-56. 1994The Court noted, “So long as the gun was concealed somewhere in the supermarket, with its actual whereabouts unknown, it obviously posed more than one danger to the public safety: an accomplice might make use of it, a customer or employee might later come upon it.” Id. at 657. | 1 | 1 |
Appeal of Longhigreen2 sentences1988Germaine v. Adams, 117 N.H. 659, 662 , 377 A.2d 620, 623 (1977); Appeal of Longhi, 127 N.H. 570, 571 , 503 A.2d 833, 834 (1986). 1988Germaine v. Adams, 117 N.H. 659, 662 , 377 A.2d 620, 623 (1977); Appeal of Longhi, 127 N.H. 570, 571 , 503 A.2d 833, 834 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
St. Germain v. Adamsgreen2 sentences1988Germaine v. Adams, 117 N.H. 659, 662 , 377 A.2d 620, 623 (1977); Appeal of Longhi, 127 N.H. 570, 571 , 503 A.2d 833, 834 (1986). 1988Germaine v. Adams, 117 N.H. 659, 662 , 377 A.2d 620, 623 (1977); Appeal of Longhi, 127 N.H. 570, 571 , 503 A.2d 833, 834 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
Uloth v. City Tank Corp.green1 sentence1979In New Hampshire, the manufacturer is under a general “duty to design his product reasonably safely for the uses which he can foresee.” Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co, 118 N.H. at 809, 395 A.2d at 847 ; accord, Uloth v. City Tank Corp., 384 N.E.2d 1188 (Mass. 1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Touma v. St. Mary's Bank
green
2 sentences2007On remand, the trier of fact should determine the availability of the privilege by deciding whether it is "established if the facts, although untrue, were published on a lawful occasion, in good faith, for a justifiable purpose, and with a belief, founded on reasonable grounds of its truth." Touma, 142 N.H. at 765 , 712 A.2d 619 . 2007On remand, the trier of fact should determine the availability of the privilege by deciding whether it is “established if the facts, although untrue, were published on a lawful occasion, in good faith, for a justifiable purpose, and with a belief, founded on reasonable grounds of its truth.” Touma, 142 N.H. at 765 . | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Roukey v. Riley
green
2 sentences1993It is to determine if he is unemployed because of lack of suitable job opportunities or for some other reason such as physical incapacity or unwillingness to work.” Roukey, 96 N.H. at 352 , 77 A.2d at 31 . 1988While the specific availability requirement found in ESA 282-A:31, 1(c) requires more than mere “availability for work,” the standard which was in force at the time of some of the earlier decisions of this court, see, e.g., Roukey v. Riley, supra at 352, 77 A.2d at 31 , the claimant is nevertheless able to meet the stricter requirement, that he be available for “all the shifts and during all the hours for which there is a market for the services he offers ....” We hold that a person may be in compliance with this requirement even though he is unable to accept all jobs on all shifts. | 2 | 1988–1993 |
Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
green
1 sentence1979In New Hampshire, the manufacturer is under a general “duty to design his product reasonably safely for the uses which he can foresee.” Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co, 118 N.H. at 809, 395 A.2d at 847 ; accord, Uloth v. City Tank Corp., 384 N.E.2d 1188 (Mass. 1978). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.