Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1962–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Killingsworth v. Keengreen2 sentences1976See Killingsworth v. Keen, 89 Wash. 597 , 154 P. 1096 (1916); and Martin v. Brown, 117 So.2d 665 (La.App.2d Cir. 1960). 1976See Killingsworth v. Keen, 89 Wash. 597 , 154 P. 1096 (1916); and Martin v. Brown, 117 So.2d 665 (La.App.2d Cir. 1960). | 2 | 2 |
Carr v. Monroe Manufacturing Companygreen1 sentence1972The claim of governmental privilege is no exception; in fact, the potential for misuse of government privilege, and the consequent diminution of information about government available to the public, is one more factor which strongly suggests the need for judicial arbitration of the availability of the privilege.” 1 431 F.2d at 388. | 1 | 1 |
Dan River Mills, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Commissiongreen2 sentences1962See, e. g., Dan River Mills, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Com’n, 195 Va. 997, 1002 , 81 S.E.2d 620, 623 (1954). 1962See, e. g., Dan River Mills, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Com’n, 195 Va. 997, 1002 , 81 S.E.2d 620, 623 (1954). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Martin v. Brown
neutral
2 sentences1976See Killingsworth v. Keen, 89 Wash. 597 , 154 P. 1096 (1916); and Martin v. Brown, 117 So.2d 665 (La.App.2d Cir. 1960). 1970See Killingsworth v. Keen, 89 Wash. 597 , 154 P. 1096 (1916); and Martin v. Brown, 117 So.2d 665 (La.App.2d Cir. 1960). | 2 | 1970–1976 |
Lopes v. Department of Social Services
green
1 sentence2016Lopes, 696 F.3d at 186 . 8 .We will not speculate, as part of the availability analysis, whether the cost of pursuing a conser-vatorship to access the bank accounts would swallow the value of McGovern’s assets. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Mathews v. United States
green
2 sentences2016In a decision by Chief Justice Rehnquist, the Court concluded, “We are simply not persuaded by the Government’s arguments that we should make the availability of an instruction on entrapment where the evidence justifies it subject to a requirement of consistency to which no other such defense is subject.” Id. at 66, 108 S.Ct. 883 . ¶ 33 Justice Scalia concurred, observing that “the defense of entrapment will rarely be genuinely inconsistent with the defense on the merits, and when genuine inconsistency exists its effect in destroying the defendant’s credibility will suffice to protect the inte 2016In a decision by Chief Justice Rehnquist, the Court concluded, “We are simply not persuaded by the Government’s arguments that we should make the availability of an instruction on entrapment where the evidence justifies it subject to a requirement of consistency to which no other such defense is subject.” Id. at 66, 108 S.Ct. 883 . ¶ 33 Justice Scalia concurred, observing that “the defense of entrapment will rarely be genuinely inconsistent with the defense on the merits, and when genuine inconsistency exists its effect in destroying the defendant’s credibility will suffice to protect the inte | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.