20 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1919–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Benjamin v. National Super Markets, Inc.green1 sentence1995See Benjamin v. National Super Markets, Inc., 351 So.2d 138 (La. 1977), where the plaintiff, after being denied his request to proceed in forma pauperis, filed for writs under the appellate court's supervisory jurisdiction and received expedited treatment. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Berrygreen1 sentence1984See State v. Myles, 389 So.2d 12 (La.1979); State v. Felde, 422 So.2d 370 (La.1982); see also State v. Berry, 430 So.2d 1005 (La. 1983). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Mylesgreen1 sentence1984See State v. Myles, 389 So.2d 12 (La.1979); State v. Felde, 422 So.2d 370 (La.1982); see also State v. Berry, 430 So.2d 1005 (La. 1983). | 1 | 1 |
Oglesby v. Turnergreen2 sentences1919See Oglesby v. Turner, 124 La. 1084 , 50 South. 859 . 1919See Oglesby v. Turner, 124 La. 1084 , 50 South. 859 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Robinson
green
2 sentences2022State v. Robinson, 2001-0273 (La. 5/17/02), 817 So.2d 1131, 1135 . 2020State v. Robinson, 2001- 0273 ( La. 5/ 17/ 02), 817 So. 2d 1131, 1135 ; State v. Mitchell, 2016- 0834 ( La. | 7 | 2013–2022 |
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences2017Id.; State v. Williams, 1004-608 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/30/04) , 889 So.2d 1093, 1100 , writ denied, 05-0081 (La. 4/22/05), 899 So.2d 559 . 2007Williams, 04-608 at pp. 8-9, 889 So.2d at 1100 . | 2 | 2007–2017 |
Disciplinary Counsel v. Pullins
neutral
1 sentence2021Clermont No. CA2009-07-043, 2010-Ohio-2308 , cause dismissed, 2010- Ohio- 3887, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1538 , 932 N.E.2d 334 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire
neutral
1 sentence2021Clermont No. CA2009-07-043, 2010-Ohio-2308 , cause dismissed, 2010- Ohio- 3887, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1538 , 932 N.E.2d 334 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Williams
green
1 sentence2017Id.; State v. Williams, 1004-608 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/30/04) , 889 So.2d 1093, 1100 , writ denied, 05-0081 (La. 4/22/05), 899 So.2d 559 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Wagner
green
1 sentence1996Id. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Roberson v. Provident House
green
1 sentence1994First South Production Credit Association v. Georgia-Pacific, 585 So.2d 545 (La.1991); Roberson v. Provident House, 576 So.2d 992 (La.1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
First South Prod. Cr. v. Georgia-Pacific
green
1 sentence1994First South Production Credit Association v. Georgia-Pacific, 585 So.2d 545 (La.1991); Roberson v. Provident House, 576 So.2d 992 (La.1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Chinn
green
2 sentences1989Defendant finds support for this argument in some of the court’s language in State v. Chinn, 229 La. 984 , 87 So.2d 315 (1956). 1989Defendant finds support for this argument in some of the court’s language in State v. Chinn, 229 La. 984 , 87 So.2d 315 (1956). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Felde
green
1 sentence1984See State v. Myles, 389 So.2d 12 (La.1979); State v. Felde, 422 So.2d 370 (La.1982); see also State v. Berry, 430 So.2d 1005 (La. 1983). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bertrand
green
1 sentence1972One of them, of course, is State, Department of Highways v. Landry, supra. The other two are: State, Department of Highways v. LeDoux, 184 So.2d 604 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1966); and State, Department of Highways v. Bertrand, 184 So.2d 611 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1966). [7] Another case cited by them, State, Department of Highways v. Caillier, 157 So.2d 274 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1963), contains language which can be interpreted as approving the principle of the front land rear land rule. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Caillier
green
1 sentence1972One of them, of course, is State, Department of Highways v. Landry, supra. The other two are: State, Department of Highways v. LeDoux, 184 So.2d 604 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1966); and State, Department of Highways v. Bertrand, 184 So.2d 611 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1966). [7] Another case cited by them, State, Department of Highways v. Caillier, 157 So.2d 274 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1963), contains language which can be interpreted as approving the principle of the front land rear land rule. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
State, Department of Highways v. LeDoux
green
1 sentence1972One of them, of course, is State, Department of Highways v. Landry, supra. The other two are: State, Department of Highways v. LeDoux, 184 So.2d 604 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1966); and State, Department of Highways v. Bertrand, 184 So.2d 611 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1966). [7] Another case cited by them, State, Department of Highways v. Caillier, 157 So.2d 274 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1963), contains language which can be interpreted as approving the principle of the front land rear land rule. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
State, Department of Highways v. Landry
green
1 sentence1972One of them, of course, is State, Department of Highways v. Landry, supra. The other two are: State, Department of Highways v. LeDoux, 184 So.2d 604 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1966); and State, Department of Highways v. Bertrand, 184 So.2d 611 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1966). [7] Another case cited by them, State, Department of Highways v. Caillier, 157 So.2d 274 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1963), contains language which can be interpreted as approving the principle of the front land rear land rule. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Grennon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
green
1 sentence1960As pointed out in the case of Grennon v. New Orleans Public Services, Inc., supra [ 17 La.App. 700 , 136 So. 314 ], this article “establishes a conclusive presumption of law, or, in other words a presumption of juris et de jure.” Having concluded that the plaintiff is entitled to interest on all of his past due salary, we must next determine the exact amount to which he is entitled. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Bradley v. Swift & Co.
green
1 sentence1949The argument is that in order that a legal widow stand in the way of a member of the family, or in the way of any one else in a subordinate group, the widow must be one who has a right to recover in compensation and that is exactly what was held in Balthazar v. Swift Co., supra [ 167 La. 249 , 119 So. 39 ]. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
State v. Layton
neutral
2 sentences1941After the case has been decided by the Supreme Court, the State can not suggest incompleteness of the record and apply for certiorari.” In the case of State v. Layton, 181 La. 274 , 159 So. 387 , this Court granted writs of certiorari and prohibition to prevent the trial judge and district attorney from correcting alleged errors in the minutes of the court by way of rule after we had decided the case and while it was pending here on rehearing. 1941After the case has been decided by the Supreme Court, the State can not suggest incompleteness of the record and apply for certiorari.” In the case of State v. Layton, 181 La. 274 , 159 So. 387 , this Court granted writs of certiorari and prohibition to prevent the trial judge and district attorney from correcting alleged errors in the minutes of the court by way of rule after we had decided the case and while it was pending here on rehearing. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.