showing violation (Minnesota) · Go Syfert
← Minnesota issues

showing violation in Minnesota

19 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1931–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Reedgreen
minn · 2007 · cited in 2 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2014–2015
2 sentences

2015Typically, a plain-error determination requires a showing that the error “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” Id. (quotation omitted).

2014Typically, a plain-error determination requires a showing that the error “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.” State v. Reed, 737 N.W.2d 572, 583 (Minn. 2007).

12
In Re GlaxoSmithKline Plcgreen
minnctapp · 2006 · cited in 2 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
2 sentences

2007The court of appeals further stated that Noerr-Pennington would not prevent the disclosure of GSK's documents without a showing that the standard for protection of associational activity is met. 713 N.W.2d at 56 .

2007The court of appeals further stated that Noerr-Pennington would not prevent the disclosure of GSK’s documents without a showing that the standard for protection of associational activity is met. 713 N.W.2d at 56.

12
State v. Mantheygreen
minn · 2006 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015State v. Manthey, 711 N.W.2d 498, 504 (Minn. 2006).

11
King v. Stategreen
minn · 1997 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
1 sentence

1999King v. State, 562 N.W.2d 791, 794 (Minn.1997). “[Pjostconviction relief is proper not only where constitutional issues are raised but also upon a showing of violation of state law.” Bangert v. State, 282 N.W.2d 540, 544-45 (Minn.1979).

11
Bangert v. Stategreen
minn · 1979 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
1 sentence

1999King v. State, 562 N.W.2d 791, 794 (Minn.1997). “[Pjostconviction relief is proper not only where constitutional issues are raised but also upon a showing of violation of state law.” Bangert v. State, 282 N.W.2d 540, 544-45 (Minn.1979).

11
Lee v. Moltergreen
minn · 1949 · cited in 1 Minnesota opinions naming this issue, 1972–1972
2 sentences

1972The burden of the evidence shifts to the violator ‘to at least counterbalance the prima facie case made by the showing of violation.’ ” In Lee v. Molter, 227 Minn. 557, 563 , 35 N. W. 2d 801, 804 (1949), we said: “It is clear that the failure of defendant here to stop and look was the direct and proximate cause of the collision with the gas car on which plaintiff was riding.

1972The burden of the evidence shifts to the violator ‘to at least counterbalance the prima facie case made by the showing of violation.’ ” In Lee v. Molter, 227 Minn. 557, 563 , 35 N. W. 2d 801, 804 (1949), we said: “It is clear that the failure of defendant here to stop and look was the direct and proximate cause of the collision with the gas car on which plaintiff was riding.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Knaffla green
minn · 1976
2 sentences

2012Id. at 251, 243 N.W.2d at 740-41 .

2009Id., 243 N.W.2d at 740-41 .

31979–2012
United States v. Morgan green
scotus · 1954
2 sentences

1959The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” In Moore v. Michigan, 355 U. S. 155 , 78 S. Ct. 191 , 2 L. ed. (2d) 167, it was held that when an accused without counsel pleads guilty and later seeks release the burden rests upon him to establish that he did not competently and intelligently waive his right to assistance of counsel, citing Johnson v. Zerbst, supra. And in United States v. Morga

1959The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” In Moore v. Michigan, 355 U. S. 155 , 78 S. Ct. 191 , 2 L. ed. (2d) 167, it was held that when an accused without counsel pleads guilty and later seeks release the burden rests upon him to establish that he did not competently and intelligently waive his right to assistance of counsel, citing Johnson v. Zerbst, supra. And in United States v. Morga

21959–1959
State v. Griller green
minn · 1998
1 sentence

2015Soderbeck argues that this evidence was “highly prejudicial because the jury was not told that [he] had the right to require a warrant” and “unfairly implied to the jury that [he] refused to give a DNA sample because of his guilt.” But the third prong of the plain- error test requires a showing that the error was prejudicial and that the error “affected the outcome of the case.” Griller, 583 N.W.2d at 741 .

12015–2015
Dietrich v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. green
minn · 1995
1 sentence

2011In Dietrich , the Minnesota Supreme Court held that, because the additional showing requirement was limited to cases involving a bona fide RIF, the first question before the court had to be whether a RIF occurred. 536 N.W.2d at 324 .

12011–2011
State v. Hummel green
minn · 1992
2 sentences

2009As in Hummel, Under-dahl advanced no theories on how the source code “could be related to [his] defense or why the [source code] was reasonably likely to contain information related to the case.” 483 N.W.2d at 72 . 5 We hold that, even under a lenient showing requirement, Underdahl failed to make a showing that the source code may relate to his guilt or innocence.

2009As in Hummel , Underdahl advanced no theories on how the source code "could be related to [his] defense or why the [source code] was reasonably likely to contain information related to the case." 483 N.W.2d at 72 . [5] We hold *686 that, even under a lenient showing requirement, Underdahl failed to make a showing that the source code may relate to his guilt or innocence.

12009–2009
Ridgewood Development Co. v. State green
minn · 1980
2 sentences

2006The Ridgewood court explained that this requires a showing not only of error on the part of the government, but of "wrongful conduct." Ridgewood, 294 N.W.2d at 293 .

2006The Ridgewood court explained that this requires a showing not only of error on the part of the government, but of “wrongful conduct.” Ridgewood, 294 N.W.2d at 293 .

12006–2006
City of St. Paul v. Landreville green
minn · 1974
1 sentence

1980Neither does the record indicate a want of prosecution denying the right of a speedy trial*** 301 Minn, at 46-47, 221 N.W.2d at 534 .

11980–1980
Town of Buyck v. Buyck neutral
minn · 1910
2 sentences

1962As we construe § 367.16(1), an order of the town officers is not “made pursuant to law” if it is based on a claim which on its face is improperly prepared. 1 Under such circumstances the town treasurer is not protected by the doctrine of Town of Buyck v. Buyck, 112 Minn. 94, 100 , 127 N. W. 452, 454 , where we .stated: “We are not to be understood as holding that a public treasurer, who disburses public money on warrants, or orders, fair upon their face, in good faith, and without knowledge of the facts showing the illegality of the claims upon which the order or warrant purports to have been

1962As we construe § 367.16(1), an order of the town officers is not “made pursuant to law” if it is based on a claim which on its face is improperly prepared. 1 Under such circumstances the town treasurer is not protected by the doctrine of Town of Buyck v. Buyck, 112 Minn. 94, 100 , 127 N. W. 452, 454 , where we .stated: “We are not to be understood as holding that a public treasurer, who disburses public money on warrants, or orders, fair upon their face, in good faith, and without knowledge of the facts showing the illegality of the claims upon which the order or warrant purports to have been

11962–1962
Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann green
scotus · 1943
2 sentences

1959It is presumed the proceedings were correct and the burden rests on the accused to show otherwise.” 1 In Adams v. United States, 317 U. S. 269, 276 , 63 S. Ct. 236, 240 , 87 L. ed. 268, 273, 143 A. L.

1959It is presumed the proceedings were correct and the burden rests on the accused to show otherwise.” 1 In Adams v. United States, 317 U. S. 269, 276 , 63 S. Ct. 236, 240 , 87 L. ed. 268, 273, 143 A. L.

11959–1959
Moore v. Michigan green
scotus · 1957
2 sentences

1959The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” In Moore v. Michigan, 355 U. S. 155 , 78 S. Ct. 191 , 2 L. ed. (2d) 167, it was held that when an accused without counsel pleads guilty and later seeks release the burden rests upon him to establish that he did not competently and intelligently waive his right to assistance of counsel, citing Johnson v. Zerbst, supra. And in United States v. Morga

1959The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” In Moore v. Michigan, 355 U. S. 155 , 78 S. Ct. 191 , 2 L. ed. (2d) 167, it was held that when an accused without counsel pleads guilty and later seeks release the burden rests upon him to establish that he did not competently and intelligently waive his right to assistance of counsel, citing Johnson v. Zerbst, supra. And in United States v. Morga

11959–1959
Haskell v. Haskell green
minn · 1911
1 sentence

1931There was no abuse of discretion. 1 & 2 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. (2 ed. & Supp.) §§ 410, 2805; Haskell v. Haskell, 116 Minn. 10 , 132 N. W. 1129 .

11931–1931
Backman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. green
minn · 1911
1 sentence

1931There was no abuse of discretion. 1 & 2 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. (2 ed. & Supp.) §§ 410, 2805; Haskell v. Haskell, 116 Minn. 10 , 132 N. W. 1129 .

11931–1931

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MN § Minn. Stat. § 480A.08 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IL 275 (1900–2026) CA 159 (1912–2026) OH 117 (1946–2026) TX 107 (1927–2026) NJ 66 (1955–2025) MI 63 (1960–2025) NY 62 (1935–2023) FL 52 (1949–2025) WA 34 (1968–2021) LA 30 (1956–2023) VT 27 (1987–2020) CT 27 (1984–2026) MO 25 (1896–2020) IA 24 (1917–2025) IN 23 (1910–2026) MA 22 (1935–2023) GA 20 (1905–2026) UT 20 (1993–2025) MN 19 (1931–2015) MS 18 (1992–2016) NE 18 (1894–2023) NM 18 (1978–2025) ID 17 (1921–2023) MD 16 (1958–2024) ND 16 (1964–2016) AZ 15 (1951–2022) KY 14 (1922–2025) DC 14 (1989–2025) KS 14 (1905–2024) PA 14 (1904–2026) NC 14 (1974–2025) OK 13 (1909–2023) CO 12 (1976–2025) RI 12 (1963–2025) WI 12 (1929–2025) AL 12 (1952–2012) WV 9 (1982–2022) AR 8 (1991–2020) HI 7 (1971–2018) OR 7 (1981–2022) MT 7 (1936–2020) NV 6 (1984–2015) ME 6 (1956–2025) SD 5 (1989–2024) TN 5 (2000–2019) SC 5 (1957–2017) AK 4 (1989–2021) WY 4 (1942–2019) VI 4 (2013–2015) DE 3 (1978–2016) VA 3 (2005–2026) NH 2 (1950–1967)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check