showing defense (Wisconsin) · Go Syfert
← Wisconsin issues

showing defense in Wisconsin

12 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1929–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Andres Romero-Georganagreen
wis · 2014 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
1 sentence

2021See Romero-Georgana, 360 Wis. 2d 522, ¶¶43-46 .9 We may consider either deficiency or prejudice first, and if one is unproven, we need not address the other.

11
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyergreen
scotus · 1994 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015In Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 480 (1994), the United States Supreme Court determined that "sue and be sued" clauses are presumed to waive the sovereign immunity absent a showing that the clause was intended to have a more narrow purpose.

2015In Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 480 (1994), the United States Supreme Court determined that "sue and be sued" clauses are presumed to waive the sovereign immunity absent a showing that the clause was intended to have a more narrow purpose.

11
Strickland v. Washingtongreen
scotus · 1984 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
1 sentence

2000See id. at 688 .

11
State v. Leegreen
wisctapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
1 sentence

2000Lee, 175 Wis. 2d at 352, 356 .

11
Miller v. Fostergreen
wis · 1943 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1968–1968
2 sentences

1968See Miller v. Foster (1943), 244 Wis. 99 , 11 N. W. 2d 674 ; Holzbauer v. Ritter (1924), 184 Wis. 35 , 198 N. W. 852 .

1968See Miller v. Foster (1943), 244 Wis. 99 , 11 N. W. 2d 674 ; Holzbauer v. Ritter (1924), 184 Wis. 35 , 198 N. W. 852 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Leszczynski v. Surges green
wis · 1966
2 sentences

1970The moving party must make out a prima facie case in his motion and affidavits.” We have also pointed out in Leszczynski v. Surges (1966), 30 Wis. 2d 534, 539 , 141 N. W. 2d 261 : “This showing of a defense must be by affidavit or other proof and a defendant cannot stand on a verified answer to perform that function.

1970The moving party must make out a prima facie case in his motion and affidavits.” We have also pointed out in Leszczynski v. Surges (1966), 30 Wis. 2d 534, 539 , 141 N. W. 2d 261 : “This showing of a defense must be by affidavit or other proof and a defendant cannot stand on a verified answer to perform that function.

31968–1970
Laughnan v. Griffiths green
wis · 1955
2 sentences

1970Pleadings are ineffectual as proof because facts stated in an affidavit take precedence over inconsistent allegations in a pleading.” In Laughnan v. Griffiths (1955), 271 Wis. 247 , 73 N. W. 2d 587 , we held that, for summary judgment, proof other than allegations of the pleadings is required.

1970Pleadings are ineffectual as proof because facts stated in an affidavit take precedence over inconsistent allegations in a pleading.” In Laughnan v. Griffiths (1955), 271 Wis. 247 , 73 N. W. 2d 587 , we held that, for summary judgment, proof other than allegations of the pleadings is required.

21970–1970
State v. George E. Savage green
wis · 2020
1 sentence

2025Savage, 395 Wis. 2d 1, ¶35 . ¶18 Natcone fails to show either option.

12025–2025
Franks v. Delaware green
scotus · 1978
1 sentence

1988The Franks Court adopted the substantial preliminary showing requirement partly "to prevent the misuse of a veracity hearing for purposes of discovery or obstruction” and declined to decide "whether the reviewing court must ever require the revelation of the identity of an informant once a substantial preliminary showing of falsity has been made.” Franks, 438 U.S. at 170 .

11988–1988
Village of Wind Point v. Halverson green
wis · 1968
2 sentences

1980Village of Wind Point v. Halverson, 38 Wis.2d 1, 11 , 155 N.W.2d 654 (1968).

1980Village of Wind Point v. Halverson, 38 Wis.2d 1, 11 , 155 N.W.2d 654 (1968).

11980–1980
Holzbauer v. Ritter green
wis · 1924
2 sentences

1968See Miller v. Foster (1943), 244 Wis. 99 , 11 N. W. 2d 674 ; Holzbauer v. Ritter (1924), 184 Wis. 35 , 198 N. W. 852 .

1968See Miller v. Foster (1943), 244 Wis. 99 , 11 N. W. 2d 674 ; Holzbauer v. Ritter (1924), 184 Wis. 35 , 198 N. W. 852 .

11968–1968
Hoefer v. City of Milwaukee neutral
wis · 1913
2 sentences

1929Hoefer v. Milwaukee, 155 Wis. 83 , 143 N. W. 1038 ; Thomsen v. Gennrich,.186 Wis. 76, 202 N. W. 168 ; Hogensen v. Prahl, 190 Wis. 214 , 208 N. W. 867 .

1929Hoefer v. Milwaukee, 155 Wis. 83 , 143 N. W. 1038 ; Thomsen v. Gennrich,.186 Wis. 76, 202 N. W. 168 ; Hogensen v. Prahl, 190 Wis. 214 , 208 N. W. 867 .

11929–1929
Thomsen v. Gennrich neutral
wis · 1925
2 sentences

1929Hoefer v. Milwaukee, 155 Wis. 83 , 143 N. W. 1038 ; Thomsen v. Gennrich,.186 Wis. 76, 202 N. W. 168 ; Hogensen v. Prahl, 190 Wis. 214 , 208 N. W. 867 .

1929Hoefer v. Milwaukee, 155 Wis. 83 , 143 N. W. 1038 ; Thomsen v. Gennrich,.186 Wis. 76, 202 N. W. 168 ; Hogensen v. Prahl, 190 Wis. 214 , 208 N. W. 867 .

11929–1929
Hogensen v. Prahl neutral
wis · 1926
2 sentences

1929Hoefer v. Milwaukee, 155 Wis. 83 , 143 N. W. 1038 ; Thomsen v. Gennrich,.186 Wis. 76, 202 N. W. 168 ; Hogensen v. Prahl, 190 Wis. 214 , 208 N. W. 867 .

1929Hoefer v. Milwaukee, 155 Wis. 83 , 143 N. W. 1038 ; Thomsen v. Gennrich,.186 Wis. 76, 202 N. W. 168 ; Hogensen v. Prahl, 190 Wis. 214 , 208 N. W. 867 .

11929–1929

Where else courts name it

IL 275 (1900–2026) CA 159 (1912–2026) OH 117 (1946–2026) TX 107 (1927–2026) NJ 66 (1955–2025) MI 63 (1960–2025) NY 62 (1935–2023) FL 52 (1949–2025) WA 34 (1968–2021) LA 30 (1956–2023) VT 27 (1987–2020) CT 27 (1984–2026) MO 25 (1896–2020) IA 24 (1917–2025) IN 23 (1910–2026) MA 22 (1935–2023) GA 20 (1905–2026) UT 20 (1993–2025) MN 19 (1931–2015) MS 18 (1992–2016) NE 18 (1894–2023) NM 18 (1978–2025) ID 17 (1921–2023) MD 16 (1958–2024) ND 16 (1964–2016) AZ 15 (1951–2022) KY 14 (1922–2025) DC 14 (1989–2025) KS 14 (1905–2024) PA 14 (1904–2026) NC 14 (1974–2025) OK 13 (1909–2023) CO 12 (1976–2025) RI 12 (1963–2025) WI 12 (1929–2025) AL 12 (1952–2012) WV 9 (1982–2022) AR 8 (1991–2020) HI 7 (1971–2018) OR 7 (1981–2022) MT 7 (1936–2020) NV 6 (1984–2015) ME 6 (1956–2025) SD 5 (1989–2024) TN 5 (2000–2019) SC 5 (1957–2017) AK 4 (1989–2021) WY 4 (1942–2019) VI 4 (2013–2015) DE 3 (1978–2016) VA 3 (2005–2026) NH 2 (1950–1967)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check