Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
18 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Newsom v. Stategreen2 sentences2016See Jackson v. State, 645 So. 2d 921, 924 (Miss. 1994) (quoting Newsom v. State, 629 So. 2d 611, 612 (Miss. 1993)) (“[w]e are not required to reverse a case based solely upon the showing of an error. . . .”). ¶22. 2016See Jackson v. State, 645 So.2d 921, 924 (Miss. 1994) (quoting Newsom v. State, 629 So.2d 611, 612 (Miss. 1993)) (“[w]e are not required to reverse a case based solely upon the showing of an error. ...”). ¶22. | 8 | 8 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences2016See Jackson v. State, 645 So. 2d 921, 924 (Miss. 1994) (quoting Newsom v. State, 629 So. 2d 611, 612 (Miss. 1993)) (“[w]e are not required to reverse a case based solely upon the showing of an error. . . .”). ¶22. 2016See Jackson v. State, 645 So.2d 921, 924 (Miss. 1994) (quoting Newsom v. State, 629 So.2d 611, 612 (Miss. 1993)) (“[w]e are not required to reverse a case based solely upon the showing of an error. ...”). ¶22. | 5 | 8 |
Johnson v. Stategreen2 sentences2009Johnson v. State, 962 So.2d 87, 89 (¶ 12) (Miss.Ct.App.2007). ¶ 5. 2009Johnson v. State, 962 So.2d 87, 89 (¶ 12) (Miss.Ct.App.2007). ¶ 7. | 3 | 3 |
Mohr v. Stategreen2 sentences1999This requires a showing that the error or omission was of such magnitude that it created "a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Mohr v. State, 584 So.2d 426, 430 (Miss.1991). 1994This requires a showing that the error or omission was of such magnitude that it created "a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Mohr v. State, 584 So. 2d 426, 430 (Miss. 1991). | 2 | 2 |
Stephens v. Stategreen1 sentence2011To establish plain error, there must be a showing of an error at the trial level resulting in a “miscarriage of justice.” Stephens v. State, 911 So.2d 424, 432 (¶ 19) (Miss.2005). ¶ 8. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Parker v. State
green
2 sentences2003Id. 2001Id. | 2 | 2001–2003 |
Bowie v. Montfort Jones Memorial Hosp.
green
1 sentence2005Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
California v. Ramos
green
2 sentences1992Gilliard has not made this showing as to this claim; in fact, California v. Ramos, 463 U.S. 992 , 103 S.Ct. 3446 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1171 (1983), makes clear that information given to the jury about post-sentencing proceedings is not prohibited. 1992Gilliard has not made this showing as to this claim; in fact, California v. Ramos, 463 U.S. 992 , 103 S.Ct. 3446 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1171 (1983), makes clear that information given to the jury about post-sentencing proceedings is not prohibited. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.