27 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1984–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Levitzgreen2 sentences2026A restric- tive covenant may be enforced by injunction without a showing that violation of the covenant will cause harm to the plaintiff, so long as such relief is not inequitable.” Casner v. Roberts Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Levitz, 173 Conn. 15, 22 , 376 A.2d 381 (1977). 2026A restric- tive covenant may be enforced by injunction without a showing that violation of the covenant will cause harm to the plaintiff, so long as such relief is not inequitable.” Casner v. Roberts Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Levitz, 173 Conn. 15, 22 , 376 A.2d 381 (1977). | 2 | 7 |
State v. Maninigreen2 sentences2000A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edwards, 39 Conn. App. 242, 251 , 665 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 925, 666 A.2d 1186 , 1187 (1995); see also State v. Hanks, 39 Conn App. 333, 344, 665 A.2d 102 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995); State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 94 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). 1996“A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error ‘only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.’ ” State v. Edwards, supra, 251-52 , quoting State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 488 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994); see State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 98 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). | 1 | 2 |
Stewart v. Middlesex Insurancegreen2 sentences2000A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edwards, 39 Conn. App. 242, 251 , 665 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 925, 666 A.2d 1186 , 1187 (1995); see also State v. Hanks, 39 Conn App. 333, 344, 665 A.2d 102 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995); State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 94 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). 1996“A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error ‘only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.’ ” State v. Edwards, supra, 251-52 , quoting State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 488 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994); see State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 98 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Youdingreen2 sentences2000A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edwards, 39 Conn. App. 242, 251 , 665 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 925, 666 A.2d 1186 , 1187 (1995); see also State v. Hanks, 39 Conn App. 333, 344, 665 A.2d 102 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995); State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 94 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). 2000A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edwards, 39 Conn. App. 242, 251 , 665 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 925, 666 A.2d 1186 , 1187 (1995); see also State v. Hanks, 39 Conn App. 333, 344, 665 A.2d 102 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995); State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 94 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Varszegigreen2 sentences2015We note that both parties assume that the evidence required for the preliminary showing is the standard for a jury instruction on a general defense, which is that a defendant is entitled to present a defense to the jury so long as there is some evidential basis, ‘‘no matter how weak or incredible . . . .’’ State v. Montanez, 277 Conn. 735, 750 , 894 A.2d 928 (2006); see State v. Varszegi, 236 Conn. 266, 282 , 673 A.2d 90 (1996). 2015We note that both parties assume that the evidence required for the preliminary showing is the standard for a jury instruction on a general defense, which is that a defendant is entitled to present a defense to the jury so long as there is some evidential basis, ‘‘no matter how weak or incredible . . . .’’ State v. Montanez, 277 Conn. 735, 750 , 894 A.2d 928 (2006); see State v. Varszegi, 236 Conn. 266, 282 , 673 A.2d 90 (1996). | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Martingreen2 sentences2009A [party] can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Sachs v. Sachs, supra, 60 Conn. App. 345 ; see also Martin v. Martin, 101 Conn. App. 106 , 120 n.7, 920 A.2d 340 (2007). 2009A [party] can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Sachs v. Sachs, supra, 60 Conn. App. 345 ; see also Martin v. Martin, 101 Conn. App. 106 , 120 n.7, 920 A.2d 340 (2007). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Godfreygreen1 sentence2000A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edwards, 39 Conn. App. 242, 251 , 665 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 925, 666 A.2d 1186 , 1187 (1995); see also State v. Hanks, 39 Conn App. 333, 344, 665 A.2d 102 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995); State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 94 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lacconegreen1 sentence2000A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edwards, 39 Conn. App. 242, 251 , 665 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 925, 666 A.2d 1186 , 1187 (1995); see also State v. Hanks, 39 Conn App. 333, 344, 665 A.2d 102 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995); State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 94 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hanksgreen1 sentence2000A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edwards, 39 Conn. App. 242, 251 , 665 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 925, 666 A.2d 1186 , 1187 (1995); see also State v. Hanks, 39 Conn App. 333, 344, 665 A.2d 102 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995); State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 94 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). | 1 | 1 |
Saturn Construction Co. v. Premier Roofing Co.green2 sentences1999In addition, [e]very reasonable presumption and intendment will be made in favor of the [arbitral] award and of the arbitrators' acts and proceedings." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 118-19; see also, e.g., Saturn Construction Co. v. Premier Roofing Co., 238 Conn. 293 , 304 , 680 A.2d 1274 (1996) ("Because we favor arbitration as a means of settling private disputes, we undertake judicial review of arbitration awards in a manner designed to minimize interference with an efficient and economical system of alternative dispute resolution."); Steiner v. Middlesex Mutual 1999In addition, [e]very reasonable presumption and intendment will be made in favor of the [arbitral] award and of the arbitrators' acts and proceedings." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 118-19; see also, e.g., Saturn Construction Co. v. Premier Roofing Co., 238 Conn. 293 , 304 , 680 A.2d 1274 (1996) ("Because we favor arbitration as a means of settling private disputes, we undertake judicial review of arbitration awards in a manner designed to minimize interference with an efficient and economical system of alternative dispute resolution."); Steiner v. Middlesex Mutual | 1 | 1 |
Steiner v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.green2 sentences1999In addition, [e]very reasonable presumption and intendment will be made in favor of the [arbitral] award and of the arbitrators' acts and proceedings." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 118-19; see also, e.g., Saturn Construction Co. v. Premier Roofing Co., 238 Conn. 293 , 304 , 680 A.2d 1274 (1996) ("Because we favor arbitration as a means of settling private disputes, we undertake judicial review of arbitration awards in a manner designed to minimize interference with an efficient and economical system of alternative dispute resolution."); Steiner v. Middlesex Mutual 1999In addition, [e]very reasonable presumption and intendment will be made in favor of the [arbitral] award and of the arbitrators' acts and proceedings." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 118-19; see also, e.g., Saturn Construction Co. v. Premier Roofing Co., 238 Conn. 293 , 304 , 680 A.2d 1274 (1996) ("Because we favor arbitration as a means of settling private disputes, we undertake judicial review of arbitration awards in a manner designed to minimize interference with an efficient and economical system of alternative dispute resolution."); Steiner v. Middlesex Mutual | 1 | 1 |
Wambeck v. Lovetrigreen2 sentences1990Because the plaintiff does possess a present right-of-way, his covenant “ ‘may be enforced by injunction without a showing that violation of the covenant will cause harm to the plaintiff, so long as such relief is not inequitable.’ ” Manley v. Pfeiffer, 176 Conn. 540, 544-45 , 409 A.2d 1009 (1979); see also Wambeck v. Lovetri, 141 Conn. 558, 564 , 107 A.2d 395 (1954). 1990Because the plaintiff does possess a present right-of-way, his covenant “ ‘may be enforced by injunction without a showing that violation of the covenant will cause harm to the plaintiff, so long as such relief is not inequitable.’ ” Manley v. Pfeiffer, 176 Conn. 540, 544-45 , 409 A.2d 1009 (1979); see also Wambeck v. Lovetri, 141 Conn. 558, 564 , 107 A.2d 395 (1954). | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Lawrence Gilbert Cheshergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Metropolitan District Commission v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 4, Local 184
green
2 sentences2007In the absence of a showing of a violation of the statute, the courts should not interfere in the arbitral decision.” (Citation omitted.) Metropolitan District Commission v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 184, 237 Conn. 114, 118 , 676 A.2d 825 (1996). 2007In the absence of a showing of a violation of the statute, the courts should not interfere in the arbitral decision.” (Citation omitted.) Metropolitan District Commission v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 184, 237 Conn. 114, 118 , 676 A.2d 825 (1996). | 2 | 1997–2007 |
State v. Harrison
green
2 sentences1996“A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error ‘only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.’ ” State v. Edwards, supra, 251-52 , quoting State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 488 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994); see State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 98 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). 1996“A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error ‘only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.’ ” State v. Edwards, supra, 251-52 , quoting State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 488 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994); see State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 98 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). | 2 | 1995–1996 |
State v. Tate
green
2 sentences1996“A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error ‘only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.’ ” State v. Edwards, supra, 251-52 , quoting State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 488 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994); see State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 98 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). 1995A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error “only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 488 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994). | 2 | 1995–1996 |
State v. Harrison
green
2 sentences1996“A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error ‘only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.’ ” State v. Edwards, supra, 251-52 , quoting State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 488 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994); see State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 98 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). 1995A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error “only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 488 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994). | 2 | 1995–1996 |
Martone v. Lensink
green
2 sentences1995Martone v. Lensink, 207 Conn. 296 , 301 (1988). 1995Martone v. Lensink, 207 Conn. 296 , 301 (1988). | 2 | 1995–1995 |
Gino's Pizza of East Hartford, Inc. v. Kaplan
green
2 sentences2026“When presented with a viola- tion of a restrictive covenant, the court is obligated to enforce the covenant unless the defendant can show that enforcement would be inequitable.” Gino’s Pizza of East Hartford, Inc. v. Kaplan, 193 Conn. 135, 139 , 475 A.2d 305 (1984). 2026“When presented with a viola- tion of a restrictive covenant, the court is obligated to enforce the covenant unless the defendant can show that enforcement would be inequitable.” Gino’s Pizza of East Hartford, Inc. v. Kaplan, 193 Conn. 135, 139 , 475 A.2d 305 (1984). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.
green
2 sentences2025It is well settled that the owner of an ease- ment is entitled to relief upon a showing that he will be disturbed or obstructed in the exercise of his right.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp. of Connecticut, 22 Conn. App. 124, 130 , 576 A.2d 575 (1990), rev’d in part on other grounds, 218 Conn. 474 , 590 A.2d 431 (1991); see also Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Levitz, 173 Conn. 15, 22 , 376 A.2d 381 (1977); Waterbury v. Phoenix Soil, LLC, supra, 128 Conn. App. 628 n.7 . 2025It is well settled that the owner of an ease- ment is entitled to relief upon a showing that he will be disturbed or obstructed in the exercise of his right.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp. of Connecticut, 22 Conn. App. 124, 130 , 576 A.2d 575 (1990), rev’d in part on other grounds, 218 Conn. 474 , 590 A.2d 431 (1991); see also Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Levitz, 173 Conn. 15, 22 , 376 A.2d 381 (1977); Waterbury v. Phoenix Soil, LLC, supra, 128 Conn. App. 628 n.7 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.
green
2 sentences2025It is well settled that the owner of an ease- ment is entitled to relief upon a showing that he will be disturbed or obstructed in the exercise of his right.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp. of Connecticut, 22 Conn. App. 124, 130 , 576 A.2d 575 (1990), rev’d in part on other grounds, 218 Conn. 474 , 590 A.2d 431 (1991); see also Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Levitz, 173 Conn. 15, 22 , 376 A.2d 381 (1977); Waterbury v. Phoenix Soil, LLC, supra, 128 Conn. App. 628 n.7 . 2025It is well settled that the owner of an ease- ment is entitled to relief upon a showing that he will be disturbed or obstructed in the exercise of his right.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp. of Connecticut, 22 Conn. App. 124, 130 , 576 A.2d 575 (1990), rev’d in part on other grounds, 218 Conn. 474 , 590 A.2d 431 (1991); see also Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Levitz, 173 Conn. 15, 22 , 376 A.2d 381 (1977); Waterbury v. Phoenix Soil, LLC, supra, 128 Conn. App. 628 n.7 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Estrella
green
2 sentences2022Our courts subse- quently have clarified that standard, explaining that ‘‘[missing] evidence is material only if there is a reason- able probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Fox, supra, 192 Conn. App. 237 ; State v. Estrella, 277 Conn. 458, 485 , 893 A.2d 348 (2006) (same).12 The defendant contends that, had the currency been available, he could have (1) tested it for the absence of Drobnak’s DNA or fingerprints and (2) demonstrated that the currency denominations 2022Our courts subse- quently have clarified that standard, explaining that ‘‘[missing] evidence is material only if there is a reason- able probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Fox, supra, 192 Conn. App. 237 ; State v. Estrella, 277 Conn. 458, 485 , 893 A.2d 348 (2006) (same).12 The defendant contends that, had the currency been available, he could have (1) tested it for the absence of Drobnak’s DNA or fingerprints and (2) demonstrated that the currency denominations | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Greene v. Comm'r of Corr.
green
2 sentences2019Furthermore, it is well established that this stringent materiality test applies when a prosecutor elicits testi- mony that he or she knows or should know to be false, ‘‘[r]egardless of the lack of intent to lie on the part of the witness . . . .’’ (Emphasis added; internal quota- tion marks omitted.) Greene v. Commissioner of Cor- rection, 330 Conn. 1, 15 , 190 A.3d 851 (2018), cert. denied sub nom. 2019Furthermore, it is well established that this stringent materiality test applies when a prosecutor elicits testi- mony that he or she knows or should know to be false, ‘‘[r]egardless of the lack of intent to lie on the part of the witness . . . .’’ (Emphasis added; internal quota- tion marks omitted.) Greene v. Commissioner of Cor- rection, 330 Conn. 1, 15 , 190 A.3d 851 (2018), cert. denied sub nom. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Napue v. Illinois
green
2 sentences2018This standard ... applies whether the state solicited the false testimony or allowed it to go uncorrected; e.g., Napue v. Illinois , supra, 360 U.S. at 269 , 79 S.Ct. 1173 ; and is not substantively different from the test that permits the state to avoid having a conviction set aside, notwithstanding a violation of constitutional magnitude, upon a showing that the violation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.... 2018This standard ... applies whether the state solicited the false testimony or allowed it to go uncorrected; e.g., Napue v. Illinois , supra, 360 U.S. at 269 , 79 S.Ct. 1173 ; and is not substantively different from the test that permits the state to avoid having a conviction set aside, notwithstanding a violation of constitutional magnitude, upon a showing that the violation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.... | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Montanez
green
2 sentences2015We note that both parties assume that the evidence required for the preliminary showing is the standard for a jury instruction on a general defense, which is that a defendant is entitled to present a defense to the jury so long as there is some evidential basis, ‘‘no matter how weak or incredible . . . .’’ State v. Montanez, 277 Conn. 735, 750 , 894 A.2d 928 (2006); see State v. Varszegi, 236 Conn. 266, 282 , 673 A.2d 90 (1996). 2015We note that both parties assume that the evidence required for the preliminary showing is the standard for a jury instruction on a general defense, which is that a defendant is entitled to present a defense to the jury so long as there is some evidential basis, ‘‘no matter how weak or incredible . . . .’’ State v. Montanez, 277 Conn. 735, 750 , 894 A.2d 928 (2006); see State v. Varszegi, 236 Conn. 266, 282 , 673 A.2d 90 (1996). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Sachs v. Sachs
neutral
2 sentences2009A [party] can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Sachs v. Sachs, supra, 60 Conn.App. at 345 , 759 A.2d 510 ; see also Martin v. Martin, 101 Conn. App. 106 , 120 n. 7, 920 A.2d 340 (2007). 2009A [party] can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Sachs v. Sachs, supra, 60 Conn.App. at 345 , 759 A.2d 510 ; see also Martin v. Martin, 101 Conn. App. 106 , 120 n. 7, 920 A.2d 340 (2007). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Edwards
green
1 sentence2000A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edwards, 39 Conn. App. 242, 251 , 665 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 925, 666 A.2d 1186 , 1187 (1995); see also State v. Hanks, 39 Conn App. 333, 344, 665 A.2d 102 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995); State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 94 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Clinton
green
1 sentence2000A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edwards, 39 Conn. App. 242, 251 , 665 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 925, 666 A.2d 1186 , 1187 (1995); see also State v. Hanks, 39 Conn App. 333, 344, 665 A.2d 102 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995); State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 94 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Edwards
green
2 sentences2000A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edwards, 39 Conn. App. 242, 251 , 665 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 925, 666 A.2d 1186 , 1187 (1995); see also State v. Hanks, 39 Conn App. 333, 344, 665 A.2d 102 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995); State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 94 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). 2000A defendant can present a claim of relief from induced error only upon a showing that the error violated his constitutional rights.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edwards, 39 Conn. App. 242, 251 , 665 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 924 , 925, 666 A.2d 1186 , 1187 (1995); see also State v. Hanks, 39 Conn App. 333, 344, 665 A.2d 102 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926 , 666 A.2d 1187 (1995); State v. Youdin, 38 Conn. App. 85, 94 , 659 A.2d 728 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920 , 661 A.2d 100 (1995). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Walton
green
2 sentences1998State v. Walton, 227 Conn. 32, 65 , 630 A.2d 990 (1993). 1998State v. Walton, 227 Conn. 32, 65 , 630 A.2d 990 (1993). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Diamond Fertiliser & Chemical Corp. v. Commodities Trading International Corp.
green
2 sentences1996Diamond Fertiliser & Chemical Corp. v. Commodities Trading International Corp., 211 Conn. 541, 546-47 , 560 A.2d 419 (1989); O & G/O’Connell Joint Venturer. 1996Diamond Fertiliser & Chemical Corp. v. Commodities Trading International Corp., 211 Conn. 541, 546-47 , 560 A.2d 419 (1989); O & G/O’Connell Joint Venturer. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Manley v. Pfeiffer green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Leabo v. Leninski green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement Board v. Sullivan green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| State v. Delmonaco green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Berkovitz v. Islamic Republic of Iran green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| S. E. Johnson Co. v. Arthur S. Langenderfer, Inc. green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Spaulding v. University of Washington green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Enterprise Leasing Corp. v. Dixon green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Anonymous v. Norton green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| State v. Kersting green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Norwood v. Michigan green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Vollin v. Kimbel green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Nunnamaker v. Smith's green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.