17 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1902–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
County of Redwood v. City of Minneapolisgreen2 sentences1943See County of Redwood v. City of Minneapolis, 126 Minn. 512 , 516 , 148 N.W. 469 , 470 . 1943See County of Redwood v. City of Minneapolis, 126 Minn. 512 , 516 , 148 N.W. 469 , 470 . | 2 | 2 |
State v. Lindstromgreen2 sentences1975In State v. Lindstrom, 180 Minn. 435, 438 , 231 N. W. 12, 13 (1930), we stated: “* * * Where the defense is conducted by counsel selected by defendant or by those to whom he intrusted that duty, it is only under very exceptional circumstances that a new trial will be granted on account of the manner in which the defense was conducted * * The principal claim of inadequate representation is that defense counsel pursued an unsound and ill-advised trial strategy and thereby allowed evidence of defendant’s homosexuality and his homosexual relations with Douglas Grotte to reach the jury. 1975In State v. Lindstrom, 180 Minn. 435, 438 , 231 N. W. 12, 13 (1930), we stated: “* * * Where the defense is conducted by counsel selected by defendant or by those to whom he intrusted that duty, it is only under very exceptional circumstances that a new trial will be granted on account of the manner in which the defense was conducted * * The principal claim of inadequate representation is that defense counsel pursued an unsound and ill-advised trial strategy and thereby allowed evidence of defendant’s homosexuality and his homosexual relations with Douglas Grotte to reach the jury. | 1 | 3 |
Williams v. Stategreen1 sentence2016See Ecker, 524 N.W.2d at 717 ; see also Williams v. State, 760 N.W.2d 8, 12 (Minn. App. 2009), review denied (Minn. Apr. 21, 2009). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Eckergreen1 sentence2016See Ecker, 524 N.W.2d at 717 ; see also Williams v. State, 760 N.W.2d 8, 12 (Minn. App. 2009), review denied (Minn. Apr. 21, 2009). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Barkergreen1 sentence2014A defendant’s waiver of a Blakely hearing “must be supported in the same manner as a waiver of a jury trial on the elements of the offense; knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.” State v. Barker, 705 N.W.2d 768, 773 (Minn. 2005). | 1 | 1 |
Lee v. Wilsongreen2 sentences2010Clark Co., 245 Minn. 179, 191 , 71 N.W.2d 818, 826 (1955) (“A party is concluded by an instruction given at his own request.... [T]he trial court’s charge, even though it be erroneous, becomes the law of the case....”); Lee v. Wilson, 167 Minn. 248, 250 , 208 N.W. 803, 804 (1926) ("[I]t appears affirmatively that the cause was submitted [to the jury] in this manner and under this rule at plaintiff’s instance. 2010Clark Co., 245 Minn. 179, 191 , 71 N.W.2d 818, 826 (1955) (“A party is concluded by an instruction given at his own request.... [T]he trial court’s charge, even though it be erroneous, becomes the law of the case....”); Lee v. Wilson, 167 Minn. 248, 250 , 208 N.W. 803, 804 (1926) ("[I]t appears affirmatively that the cause was submitted [to the jury] in this manner and under this rule at plaintiff’s instance. | 1 | 1 |
Heise v. the JR Clark Co.green2 sentences2010Clark Co., 245 Minn. 179, 191 , 71 N.W.2d 818, 826 (1955) (“A party is concluded by an instruction given at his own request.... [T]he trial court’s charge, even though it be erroneous, becomes the law of the case....”); Lee v. Wilson, 167 Minn. 248, 250 , 208 N.W. 803, 804 (1926) ("[I]t appears affirmatively that the cause was submitted [to the jury] in this manner and under this rule at plaintiff’s instance. 2010Clark Co., 245 Minn. 179, 191 , 71 N.W.2d 818, 826 (1955) (“A party is concluded by an instruction given at his own request.... [T]he trial court’s charge, even though it be erroneous, becomes the law of the case....”); Lee v. Wilson, 167 Minn. 248, 250 , 208 N.W. 803, 804 (1926) ("[I]t appears affirmatively that the cause was submitted [to the jury] in this manner and under this rule at plaintiff’s instance. | 1 | 1 |
Crawford v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2008See Crawford, 541 U.S. at 43 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 (“We must * * * turn to the historical background of the Clause to understand its meaning.”); id. at 54 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 (“[T]he [Sixth Amendment] is most naturally read as a reference to the right of confrontation at common law, admitting only those exceptions established at the time of the founding.”). 2008See Crawford, 541 U.S. at 43 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 (“We must * * * turn to the historical background of the Clause to understand its meaning.”); id. at 54 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 (“[T]he [Sixth Amendment] is most naturally read as a reference to the right of confrontation at common law, admitting only those exceptions established at the time of the founding.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Billington
green
2 sentences1971As was stated in State v. Russell, 272 Minn. 463, 465 , 138 N. W. (2d) 690 , 692: “* * * To establish ineffective representation, it is not sufficient to complain about counsel’s failure to challenge certain jurors or his failure to make proper objections and to submit requested instructions which a careful scrutiny of a transcribed record arguably might indicate would have been desirable. * * * Further: “ * * Where the defense is conducted by counsel selected by defendant * * *, it is only under very exceptional circumstances that a new trial will be granted on account of the manner in which 1971As was stated in State v. Russell, 272 Minn. 463, 465 , 138 N. W. (2d) 690 , 692: “* * * To establish ineffective representation, it is not sufficient to complain about counsel’s failure to challenge certain jurors or his failure to make proper objections and to submit requested instructions which a careful scrutiny of a transcribed record arguably might indicate would have been desirable. * * * Further: “ * * Where the defense is conducted by counsel selected by defendant * * *, it is only under very exceptional circumstances that a new trial will be granted on account of the manner in which | 2 | 1957–1971 |
In Re Durant
green
2 sentences1945In re Durant, 80 Conn. 140 , 67 A. 497 , 10 Ann. 1945In re Durant, 80 Conn. 140 , 67 A. 497 , 10 Ann. | 2 | 1945–1945 |
In Re Petition for Reinstatement of Dedefo
green
1 sentence2019Because no one asserts that Severson has a mental illness or other condition, we need not engage further in this manner of analysis. *35 Cf. Dedefo , 781 N.W.2d at 11 ; Ramirez , 719 N.W.2d at 925 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
In Re Reinstatement of Ramirez
green
1 sentence2019Because no one asserts that Severson has a mental illness or other condition, we need not engage further in this manner of analysis. *35 Cf. Dedefo , 781 N.W.2d at 11 ; Ramirez , 719 N.W.2d at 925 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Grilli
green
1 sentence2015Id. (emphasis added). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Hagen
green
1 sentence2005Id. at 158-59 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Loge
green
2 sentences2003In Loge, the supreme court specifically limited its opinion to an analysis of “to keep” based on the facts of that case, and did not analyze the alternative manner of violation not presented in that case of “allowing to be kept.” Id. at 155 . 2003Noting that the legislature had used the term “knowingly keeps” in a separate subdivision imposing criminal liability for the presence of marijuana in a vehicle, the supreme court said that the distinction “indicates that the legislature does not perceive the word ‘keep’ alone to imply or contain a knowledge element.” Id. at 157 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Russell
green
2 sentences1971As was stated in State v. Russell, 272 Minn. 463, 465 , 138 N. W. (2d) 690 , 692: “* * * To establish ineffective representation, it is not sufficient to complain about counsel’s failure to challenge certain jurors or his failure to make proper objections and to submit requested instructions which a careful scrutiny of a transcribed record arguably might indicate would have been desirable. * * * Further: “ * * Where the defense is conducted by counsel selected by defendant * * *, it is only under very exceptional circumstances that a new trial will be granted on account of the manner in which 1971As was stated in State v. Russell, 272 Minn. 463, 465 , 138 N. W. (2d) 690 , 692: “* * * To establish ineffective representation, it is not sufficient to complain about counsel’s failure to challenge certain jurors or his failure to make proper objections and to submit requested instructions which a careful scrutiny of a transcribed record arguably might indicate would have been desirable. * * * Further: “ * * Where the defense is conducted by counsel selected by defendant * * *, it is only under very exceptional circumstances that a new trial will be granted on account of the manner in which | 1 | 1971–1971 |
State Ex Rel. Grattan v. Tahash
neutral
2 sentences1965Grattan v. Tahash, 262 Minn. 18 , 113 N. W. (2d) 342 , and State ex rel. 1965Grattan v. Tahash, 262 Minn. 18 , 113 N. W. (2d) 342 , and State ex rel. | 1 | 1965–1965 |
State v. Barge
green
1 sentence1902This case is controlled by the decision in State v. Barge, 82 Minn. 256 , 84 N. W. 911 . | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Gammons v. Honerud
green
1 sentence1902This case is controlled by the decision in State v. Barge, 82 Minn. 256 , 84 N. W. 911 . | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.