16 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1893–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dye v. State Ex Rel. Halegreen2 sentences2001Id. at 345-46 (citations & footnote omitted). 2000Id. at 345-46 (citations & footnote omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Thorson v. Stategreen2 sentences2001See Thorson v. State, 653 So.2d 876, 896 (Miss. 1995). ¶ 28. 1999See Thorson v. State, 653 So. 2d 876, 896 (Miss. 1995). ¶28. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Validation of $15,000,000 Hospital Rev. Bondsgreen2 sentences1985It is clear that the municipal government might have proceeded under the general law or, at its election, might have proceeded under the terms of the Local and Private Act. 361 So.2d at 49. 1985It is clear that the municipal government might have proceeded under the general law or, at its election, might have proceeded under the terms of the Local and Private Act. 361 So.2d at 49. | 2 | 2 |
Agee v. Stategreen2 sentences1993Agee v. State, 185 So. 2d 671, 673 (Miss. 1966). 1984The procedure for admitting a confession in the face of a challenge that it is involuntary was set forth in Agee v. State, 185 So.2d 671 (Miss. 1966): The State has the burden of proving the voluntariness of a confession. | 1 | 2 |
Parker v. Jones County Community Hosp.green1 sentence1992Such speculation flies in the face of the principle upon which the majority relies: As a matter of institutional imperative, "our law presumes that jurors follow the trial judge's instructions, as upon their oaths they are obliged to do." Parker v. Jones County Community Hosp., 549 So.2d 443, 446 (Miss. 1989). | 1 | 1 |
Tobias v. Stategreen1 sentence1987See Tobias v. State, 505 So.2d 1014, 1015 (Miss. 1987); Sanders v. State, 439 So.2d 1271, 1276-77 (Miss. 1983). | 1 | 1 |
Sanders v. Stategreen1 sentence1987See Tobias v. State, 505 So.2d 1014, 1015 (Miss. 1987); Sanders v. State, 439 So.2d 1271, 1276-77 (Miss. 1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine
green
2 sentences2007The Burdine Court went further to state that "[i]f the trier of fact believes the plaintiff's evidence, and if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff because no issue of fact remains in the case." 450 U.S. at 254 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 . 2007The Burdine Court went further to state that "[i]f the trier of fact believes the plaintiff's evidence, and if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff because no issue of fact remains in the case." 450 U.S. at 254 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 . | 2 | 2004–2007 |
Howard v. City of Biloxi
green
1 sentence2020In 8 Hankins, our Court “paraphrase[d]” the elements required to sustain a claim in the face of an immunity defense under the MTCA’s dangerous condition exemption, as set forth in an earlier case, Howard v. City of Biloxi, 943 So. 2d 751 (Miss. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters
green
1 sentence2004McDonnell Douglas, 10 “[T]he prima facie case ‘raises an inference of discrimination only because we presume these acts, if otherwise unexplained, are more likely than not based on the consideration of impermissible factors.’” Burdine, 450 U.S. at 254 (quoting Furnco, 438 U.S. at 577 ). 11 “If the trier of fact believes the plaintiff’s evidence, and if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff because no issue of fact remains in the case.” Burdine, 450 U.S. at 254 . 12 We read the Supreme Court precedent cited herein to say that the | 1 | 2004–2004 |
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
green
1 sentence2004McDonnell Douglas, 10 “[T]he prima facie case ‘raises an inference of discrimination only because we presume these acts, if otherwise unexplained, are more likely than not based on the consideration of impermissible factors.’” Burdine, 450 U.S. at 254 (quoting Furnco, 438 U.S. at 577 ). 11 “If the trier of fact believes the plaintiff’s evidence, and if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff because no issue of fact remains in the case.” Burdine, 450 U.S. at 254 . 12 We read the Supreme Court precedent cited herein to say that the | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Bailey v. Georgia Cotton Goods Co.
green
2 sentences1992Bailey v. Georgia Cotton Goods Co., 543 So.2d 180 (Miss. 1989) (refusal to set aside defense judgment in the face of claim creditor corporation was not authorized to sue in Mississippi courts but in the absence of any denial that the debt was due and owing). 1992Bailey v. Georgia Cotton Goods Co., 543 So.2d 180 (Miss. 1989) (refusal to set aside defense judgment in the face of claim creditor corporation was not authorized to sue in Mississippi courts but in the absence of any denial that the debt was due and owing). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Robinson v. Packard Elec. Div. GMC
green
1 sentence1991Robinson, 523 So.2d at 331 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Stokes v. State
green
1 sentence1893This instruction is clearly in the face of the rule laid down in Stokes v. State, 58 Miss., 677 , and re-affirmed in Matthews v. State, 61 Ib., 155. | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.