6 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1917–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nixon v. Allen
green
2 sentences1994In Nixon v. Allen, 150 Ark. 244 , 234 S.W. 45 , we declared an entire act to be invalid, in the face of such a clause, because we concluded that if the legislature had known in advance that part of the act was unconstitutional it would not have enacted the rest. 1994In Nixon v. Allen, 150 Ark. 244 , 234 S.W. 45 , we declared an entire act to be invalid, in the face of such a clause, because we concluded that if the legislature had known in advance that part of the act was unconstitutional it would not have enacted the rest. | 3 | 1964–1994 |
O'BRIEN v. Tilson
green
1 sentence2006In Tilson , another district court, invoking Jech , struck down a substantially identical North Carolina statute in the face of a challenge by a married couple who, in accordance with Swedish custom, wished to give their son a surname consisting of the father's given name combined with the suffix "son." 523 F. Supp. at 495 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Roe v. Wade
red
2 sentences2006The court offered the following analysis in support of its holding: Following the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973), this court concludes that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects the plaintiffs' right to choose the name of their child from arbitrary state action. 2006The court offered the following analysis in support of its holding: Following the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973), this court concludes that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects the plaintiffs' right to choose the name of their child from arbitrary state action. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
First Nat. Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
green
1 sentence2000First National Bank Of Bost v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 , 786 (1978). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Combs v. Glen Falls Insurance
green
1 sentence1993That is really the test. 237 Ark. at 748 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Aetna Life Insurance v. Taylor
neutral
1 sentence1917Grand Lodge v. Bannister, 80 Ark. 190 ; Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Taylor, supra. In the face of that presumption and of the conceded facts set forth in the agreement concerning the condition of the body when found, it can scarcely be urged with any degree of plausibility that a finding of suicide would have been justified. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen v. Banister
neutral
1 sentence1917Grand Lodge v. Bannister, 80 Ark. 190 ; Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Taylor, supra. In the face of that presumption and of the conceded facts set forth in the agreement concerning the condition of the body when found, it can scarcely be urged with any degree of plausibility that a finding of suicide would have been justified. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.