5 Virginia opinions name it 3 courts 1940–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. George L. Bohl, United States of America v. Richard R. Bellgreen1 sentence2026See, e.g., United States v. Dyess, 478 F.3d. 224, 236 (4th Cir. 2007) (affirming trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss after a prosecutor induced a witness to commit perjury because retrial would cure prejudice); United States v. Bohl, 25 F.3d 904, 914 (10th Cir. 1994) (remanding with order to dismiss indictment after the government destroyed potentially exculpatory evidence in the face of defense’s repeated requests for pretrial access to the evidence). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 796961green1 sentence2026See, e.g., United States v. Dyess, 478 F.3d. 224, 236 (4th Cir. 2007) (affirming trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss after a prosecutor induced a witness to commit perjury because retrial would cure prejudice); United States v. Bohl, 25 F.3d 904, 914 (10th Cir. 1994) (remanding with order to dismiss indictment after the government destroyed potentially exculpatory evidence in the face of defense’s repeated requests for pretrial access to the evidence). | 1 | 1 |
Lemon v. Kurtzmanred1 sentence1991“First, the statute must have a secular legislative purpose; second, its principal or primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion; finally, the statute must not foster ‘an excessive government entanglement with religion.’ ” Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602, 612-13 (1971) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hyde v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1996"While it may be possible to draw suspicious inferences from . . . [Robenholt's] contradictory statements, . . . in the face of the presumption of innocence, such inferences are insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt - 10 - that [Robenholt] committed the crimes." Id. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Brown v. Brown
green
1 sentence1979There is no evidence to show that she lived openly in the presence of the children with her paramour as did the mother in Brown v. Brown, 218 Va. 196 (1977), which was the deciding factor in award of custody to the father. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Buchanan v. Buchanan
green
2 sentences1940On March 27, 1939, Buchanan filed his response and grounds of opposition to the issuance of an execution, the 1st and 3rd of which grounds were as follows: “(1) That the alleged judgment of October 15, 1935, referred to in said show cause order, is null and void, because this Honorable Court was without power or jurisdiction to render the same in the then pending action styled Buchanan v. Buchanan, which said action was a habeas corpus proceeding. “(3) That said alleged judgment of October 15, 1935, is null and void, because this Honorable Court was without power or jurisdiction to enter the s 1940On March 27, 1939, Buchanan filed his response and grounds of opposition to the issuance of an execution, the 1st and 3rd of which grounds were as follows: “(1) That the alleged judgment of October 15, 1935, referred to in said show cause order, is null and void, because this Honorable Court was without power or jurisdiction to render the same in the then pending action styled Buchanan v. Buchanan, which said action was a habeas corpus proceeding. “(3) That said alleged judgment of October 15, 1935, is null and void, because this Honorable Court was without power or jurisdiction to enter the s | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.