12 Minnesota opinions name it 3 courts 1974–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. New Mexicogreen2 sentences2017See United States v. New Mexico, 455 U.S. 720, 733 , 102 S.Ct. 1373, 1382 , 71 L.Ed.2d 580 (1982) (concluding that the supremacy clause would be violated if a state imposed a tax on the federal government). 2017See United States v. New Mexico, 455 U.S. 720, 733 , 102 S.Ct. 1373, 1382 , 71 L.Ed.2d 580 (1982) (concluding that the supremacy clause would be violated if a state imposed a tax on the federal government). | 1 | 1 |
MNVA Railroad v. John Alden Life Insurance Co.green1 sentence1998Co., 507 N.W.2d 15, 17 (Minn.App.1993) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Sams v. Bostongreen2 sentences1997Sams v. Boston, 181 W.Va. 706 , 384 S.E.2d 151, 156 (1989) (preemption recognized under the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution); see Thompson v. Thompson, 484 U.S. 174, 183 , 108 S.Ct. 513, 518 , 98 L.Ed.2d 512 (1988) (discussing purpose of PKPA is “to have the same operative effect as the full faith and credit statute”). 5. 1997Sams v. Boston, 181 W.Va. 706 , 384 S.E.2d 151, 156 (1989) (preemption recognized under the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution); see Thompson v. Thompson, 484 U.S. 174, 183 , 108 S.Ct. 513, 518 , 98 L.Ed.2d 512 (1988) (discussing purpose of PKPA is “to have the same operative effect as the full faith and credit statute”). 5. | 1 | 1 |
Thompson v. Thompsongreen2 sentences1997Sams v. Boston, 181 W.Va. 706 , 384 S.E.2d 151, 156 (1989) (preemption recognized under the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution); see Thompson v. Thompson, 484 U.S. 174, 183 , 108 S.Ct. 513, 518 , 98 L.Ed.2d 512 (1988) (discussing purpose of PKPA is “to have the same operative effect as the full faith and credit statute”). 5. 1997Sams v. Boston, 181 W.Va. 706 , 384 S.E.2d 151, 156 (1989) (preemption recognized under the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution); see Thompson v. Thompson, 484 U.S. 174, 183 , 108 S.Ct. 513, 518 , 98 L.Ed.2d 512 (1988) (discussing purpose of PKPA is “to have the same operative effect as the full faith and credit statute”). 5. | 1 | 1 |
CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of Americagreen2 sentences1995See, e.g., CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of Am., 481 U.S. 69, 84-87 , 107 S.Ct. 1637, 1647-48 , 95 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987) (state law which delayed consummation of tender offers until at least 50 days after commencement of the offer did not conflict with 20-day federal minimum period for holding open tender offers). 1995See, e.g., CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of Am., 481 U.S. 69, 84-87 , 107 S.Ct. 1637, 1647-48 , 95 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987) (state law which delayed consummation of tender offers until at least 50 days after commencement of the offer did not conflict with 20-day federal minimum period for holding open tender offers). | 1 | 1 |
Baker v. General Motors Corp.green2 sentences1993See, e.g., Baker v. General Motors Corp., 478 U.S. 621 , 106 S.Ct. 3129 , 92 L.Ed.2d 504 (1986) (Michigan’s statutory disqualification for unemployment benefits of employee who provided financing for the strike which caused his unemployment); Metropolitan Life Ins. 1993See, e.g., Baker v. General Motors Corp., 478 U.S. 621 , 106 S.Ct. 3129 , 92 L.Ed.2d 504 (1986) (Michigan’s statutory disqualification for unemployment benefits of employee who provided financing for the strike which caused his unemployment); Metropolitan Life Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Wissner v. Wissnergreen2 sentences1987Cf. Free v. Bland, 369 U.S. 663, 670 , 82 S.Ct. 1089, 1094 , 8 L.Ed.2d 180 (1962) (valid federal regulations which *23 created a right of survivorship in United States savings bonds pre-empted inconsistent state community property law by virtue of the supremacy clause); Wissner, 338 U.S. at 661 , 70 S.Ct. at 401 (conflicting state community property laws did not apply to a military life insurance program established by Congress). 1987Cf. Free v. Bland, 369 U.S. 663, 670 , 82 S.Ct. 1089, 1094 , 8 L.Ed.2d 180 (1962) (valid federal regulations which *23 created a right of survivorship in United States savings bonds pre-empted inconsistent state community property law by virtue of the supremacy clause); Wissner, 338 U.S. at 661 , 70 S.Ct. at 401 (conflicting state community property laws did not apply to a military life insurance program established by Congress). | 1 | 1 |
Federal Distillers, Inc. v. Stategreen2 sentences1986See Federal Distillers, Inc. v. State, 304 Minn. 28, 39 , 229 N.W.2d 144, 154 , appeal dismissed, 423 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 209 , 46 L.Ed.2d 137 (1975). 1986See Federal Distillers, Inc. v. State, 304 Minn. 28, 39 , 229 N.W.2d 144, 154 , appeal dismissed, 423 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 209 , 46 L.Ed.2d 137 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
Board of Education of Armstrong High School District No. 225 v. Ellisgreen1 sentence1986See Federal Distillers, Inc. v. State, 304 Minn. 28, 39 , 229 N.W.2d 144, 154 , appeal dismissed, 423 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 209 , 46 L.Ed.2d 137 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
Appalachian Power Co. v. Public Service Commission of West Virginiagreen1 sentence1986See Federal Distillers, Inc. v. State, 304 Minn. 28, 39 , 229 N.W.2d 144, 154 , appeal dismissed, 423 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 209 , 46 L.Ed.2d 137 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Stanchfieldgreen2 sentences1974It is equally basic that under the supremacy clause the state may not, by statute, supersede the protection of constitutionally adopted Federal statutes. 1 We have held that to revive a claim discharged in bankruptcy the language used must be “clear and unequivocal, and express a distinct intention to recognize payment of the debt.” Smith v. Stanchfield, 84 Minn. 343, 345 , 87 N. W. 917, 918 (1901). 1974It is equally basic that under the supremacy clause the state may not, by statute, supersede the protection of constitutionally adopted Federal statutes. 1 We have held that to revive a claim discharged in bankruptcy the language used must be “clear and unequivocal, and express a distinct intention to recognize payment of the debt.” Smith v. Stanchfield, 84 Minn. 343, 345 , 87 N. W. 917, 918 (1901). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Denise Chavez v. Arte Publico Press
green
1 sentence1995Tex. 980 (1981) (“Moreover, the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution would prohibit the custodian from following the Open Records Act where it conflicts with the copyright law.”) Our view is that nothing in the Supremacy Clause would prohibit a state from waiving or relinquishing its rights as a copyright holder, ifits legislature so decided. lt therefore is reasonable to conclude that a state legislature can forfeit any part ofthat federal “bundle of rights" should it deem such waiver to be in the public interest Tlie state cannot forfeit those rights on behalf of third parties, | 1 | 1995–1995 |
M'culloch v. State of Maryland
green
2 sentences1990Long ago in McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316, 431 , 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819), Chief Justice Marshall observed that “the power to tax involves the power to destroy * * *.” Seeking to limit potential abuse and to curb state’s power in this regard, the United States Supreme Court held that the supremacy clause of the federal Constitution prohibited a state government from taxing a federal bank. 1990Long ago in McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316, 431 , 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819), Chief Justice Marshall observed that “the power to tax involves the power to destroy * * *.” Seeking to limit potential abuse and to curb state’s power in this regard, the United States Supreme Court held that the supremacy clause of the federal Constitution prohibited a state government from taxing a federal bank. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Free v. Bland
green
2 sentences1987Cf. Free v. Bland, 369 U.S. 663, 670 , 82 S.Ct. 1089, 1094 , 8 L.Ed.2d 180 (1962) (valid federal regulations which *23 created a right of survivorship in United States savings bonds pre-empted inconsistent state community property law by virtue of the supremacy clause); Wissner, 338 U.S. at 661 , 70 S.Ct. at 401 (conflicting state community property laws did not apply to a military life insurance program established by Congress). 1987Cf. Free v. Bland, 369 U.S. 663, 670 , 82 S.Ct. 1089, 1094 , 8 L.Ed.2d 180 (1962) (valid federal regulations which *23 created a right of survivorship in United States savings bonds pre-empted inconsistent state community property law by virtue of the supremacy clause); Wissner, 338 U.S. at 661 , 70 S.Ct. at 401 (conflicting state community property laws did not apply to a military life insurance program established by Congress). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Franklin Computer Corp. v. Apple Computer, Inc.
green
1 sentence1986The structures comprising the Little Earth housing project were assessed at 20 per *440 cent of their market value pursuant to this subdivision. 4 In Rio Vista Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. County of Ramsey, 335 N.W.2d 242 (Minn.1983) [Rio Vista II], appeal dismissed, 464 U.S. 1033 , 104 S.Ct. 690 , 79 L.Ed.2d 158 (1984), we discussed whether Minn.Stat. §§ 272.02, subd. 1(6), and 273.13, subd. 17, violate the supremacy clause. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Rio Vista Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. County of Ramsey
green
1 sentence1986The structures comprising the Little Earth housing project were assessed at 20 per *440 cent of their market value pursuant to this subdivision. 4 In Rio Vista Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. County of Ramsey, 335 N.W.2d 242 (Minn.1983) [Rio Vista II], appeal dismissed, 464 U.S. 1033 , 104 S.Ct. 690 , 79 L.Ed.2d 158 (1984), we discussed whether Minn.Stat. §§ 272.02, subd. 1(6), and 273.13, subd. 17, violate the supremacy clause. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Blatchford v. Winans
green
1 sentence1986The structures comprising the Little Earth housing project were assessed at 20 per *440 cent of their market value pursuant to this subdivision. 4 In Rio Vista Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. County of Ramsey, 335 N.W.2d 242 (Minn.1983) [Rio Vista II], appeal dismissed, 464 U.S. 1033 , 104 S.Ct. 690 , 79 L.Ed.2d 158 (1984), we discussed whether Minn.Stat. §§ 272.02, subd. 1(6), and 273.13, subd. 17, violate the supremacy clause. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Rio Vista Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. County of Ramsey
green
1 sentence1986The structures comprising the Little Earth housing project were assessed at 20 per *440 cent of their market value pursuant to this subdivision. 4 In Rio Vista Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. County of Ramsey, 335 N.W.2d 242 (Minn.1983) [Rio Vista II], appeal dismissed, 464 U.S. 1033 , 104 S.Ct. 690 , 79 L.Ed.2d 158 (1984), we discussed whether Minn.Stat. §§ 272.02, subd. 1(6), and 273.13, subd. 17, violate the supremacy clause. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
United States v. County of Fresno
green
2 sentences1986United States v. County of Fresno, 429 U.S. 452, 460 , 97 S.Ct. 699, 703-704 , 50 L.Ed.2d 683 (1977). 1986United States v. County of Fresno, 429 U.S. 452, 460 , 97 S.Ct. 699, 703-704 , 50 L.Ed.2d 683 (1977). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Northern States Power Co. v. Hagen
green
1 sentence1984Hagen, 314 N.W.2d at 38 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Minnesota v. Alexander, Secretary of the Army, Et Al.
green
1 sentence1979In State of Minn, by Spannaus v. Hoffman, 543 F.2d 1198 (8 Cir. 1976), certiorari denied, 430 U.S. 977 , 97 S.Ct. 1672 , 52 L.Ed.2d 373 , the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded, based on the supremacy clause, that the Army Corps of Engineers was not required to obtain state permits for dredging and that it need not meet state water pollution standards, at least with regard to activities essential to navigation and maintenance of interstate commerce. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State of Minnesota, by Its Attorney General, Warren Spannaus, and Its Pollution Control Agency v. Martin R. Hoffman, as Secretary of the Army
green
1 sentence1979In State of Minn, by Spannaus v. Hoffman, 543 F.2d 1198 (8 Cir. 1976), certiorari denied, 430 U.S. 977 , 97 S.Ct. 1672 , 52 L.Ed.2d 373 , the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded, based on the supremacy clause, that the Army Corps of Engineers was not required to obtain state permits for dredging and that it need not meet state water pollution standards, at least with regard to activities essential to navigation and maintenance of interstate commerce. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Christensen v. Moore
green
1 sentence1979In State of Minn, by Spannaus v. Hoffman, 543 F.2d 1198 (8 Cir. 1976), certiorari denied, 430 U.S. 977 , 97 S.Ct. 1672 , 52 L.Ed.2d 373 , the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded, based on the supremacy clause, that the Army Corps of Engineers was not required to obtain state permits for dredging and that it need not meet state water pollution standards, at least with regard to activities essential to navigation and maintenance of interstate commerce. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.