11 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harrison v. Skyline Corp.green2 sentences2015See also Harrison v. Skyline Corp., 224 W.Va. 505, 510 , 686 S.E.2d 735, 740 (2009) (“[T]he preemption doctrine has. its roots in the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution and is based on the premise that federal law can supplant inconsistent state law.”). 2015See also Harrison v. Skyline Corp., 224 W.Va. 505, 510 , 686 S.E.2d 735, 740 (2009) (“[T]he preemption doctrine has. its roots in the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution and is based on the premise that federal law can supplant inconsistent state law.”). | 3 | 3 |
Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.green1 sentence2009Geier at 867, 120 S.Ct. 1913 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Arbogast v. Arbogastgreen2 sentences1989However, in cases of conflict, the Federal PKP Act, under the supremacy clause of the Constitution of the United States, preempts the UCCJ Act of the respective states. 11 See Arbogast v. Arbogast, 174 W.Va. 498, 502 , 327 S.E.2d 675, 679 (1984). 1989However, in cases of conflict, the Federal PKP Act, under the supremacy clause of the Constitution of the United States, preempts the UCCJ Act of the respective states. 11 See Arbogast v. Arbogast, 174 W.Va. 498, 502 , 327 S.E.2d 675, 679 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kopagreen2 sentences1987Cf. State v. Kopa, 173 W.Va. 43, 49 , 311 S.E.2d 412, 418 (1983) (this Court deferred to the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding the unconstitutionality of an alibi instruction because our “sustaining convictions in the state court [would lead to] predictable release through habeas corpus in the federal court.”); see generally Wolcher, Sovereign Immunity and the Supremacy Clause: Damages Against States in Their Own Courts for Constitutional Violations, 69 Calif.L.Rev. 189 (1981) (state courts have the obligation under the supremacy clause to cast asid 1987Cf. State v. Kopa, 173 W.Va. 43, 49 , 311 S.E.2d 412, 418 (1983) (this Court deferred to the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding the unconstitutionality of an alibi instruction because our “sustaining convictions in the state court [would lead to] predictable release through habeas corpus in the federal court.”); see generally Wolcher, Sovereign Immunity and the Supremacy Clause: Damages Against States in Their Own Courts for Constitutional Violations, 69 Calif.L.Rev. 189 (1981) (state courts have the obligation under the supremacy clause to cast asid | 1 | 1 |
Estelle v. Gamblegreen2 sentences1987See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 , 97 S.Ct. 285 , 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976); Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 , 98 S.Ct. 2565 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978). 1987See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 , 97 S.Ct. 285 , 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976); Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 , 98 S.Ct. 2565 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Morgan v. Ford Motor Co.
green
2 sentences2013Id. at Syl. 2009Id. at Syl. | 2 | 2009–2013 |
Abrams v. West Virginia Racing Commission
green
1 sentence2026Abrams, 164 W. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
cluster 570444
green
1 sentence2001Our decision makes it unnecessary to reach the due process issue.” 947 F.2d at 337 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Lefkowitz
green
2 sentences1997Federal Nat’l Mortgage Ass’n v. Lefkowitz, 390 F.Supp. 1364 (S.D.N.Y.1975). 8 In reaching this conclusion, the Lefkowitz court considered the extent of the regulatory power over the post-partition FNMA that was retained by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and the Secretary of the Treasury. 1997Federal Nat’l Mortgage Ass’n v. Lefkowitz, 390 F.Supp. 1364 (S.D.N.Y.1975). 8 In reaching this conclusion, the Lefkowitz court considered the extent of the regulatory power over the post-partition FNMA that was retained by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and the Secretary of the Treasury. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Hutto v. Finney
green
2 sentences1987See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 , 97 S.Ct. 285 , 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976); Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 , 98 S.Ct. 2565 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978). 1987See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 , 97 S.Ct. 285 , 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976); Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 , 98 S.Ct. 2565 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.