12 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ahrens v. Town of Fultongreen2 sentences2025See Nicolaou, 113 Wis. 2d at 532-33, 536 (concluding that the bank’s mistaken belief that California law, not Wisconsin law, applied to its repossession of the defendants’ vehicle was an error of law that did not qualify as a bona fide error as that term is used in the Wisconsin Consumer Act); see also Ahrens v. Town of Fulton, 2000 WI App 268, ¶20 , 240 Wis. 2d 124 , 621 N.W.2d 643 (stating that the town’s alleged error could not be characterized as a clerical error because the owners alleged that the town intentionally, but erroneously, classified a mobile home as an improvement to real prop 2025See Nicolaou, 113 Wis. 2d at 532-33, 536 (concluding that the bank’s mistaken belief that California law, not Wisconsin law, applied to its repossession of the defendants’ vehicle was an error of law that did not qualify as a bona fide error as that term is used in the Wisconsin Consumer Act); see also Ahrens v. Town of Fulton, 2000 WI App 268, ¶20 , 240 Wis. 2d 124 , 621 N.W.2d 643 (stating that the town’s alleged error could not be characterized as a clerical error because the owners alleged that the town intentionally, but erroneously, classified a mobile home as an improvement to real prop | 1 | 1 |
First Wisconsin National Bank v. Nicolaougreen1 sentence2025See Nicolaou, 113 Wis. 2d at 532-33, 536 (concluding that the bank’s mistaken belief that California law, not Wisconsin law, applied to its repossession of the defendants’ vehicle was an error of law that did not qualify as a bona fide error as that term is used in the Wisconsin Consumer Act); see also Ahrens v. Town of Fulton, 2000 WI App 268, ¶20 , 240 Wis. 2d 124 , 621 N.W.2d 643 (stating that the town’s alleged error could not be characterized as a clerical error because the owners alleged that the town intentionally, but erroneously, classified a mobile home as an improvement to real prop | 1 | 1 |
Ahrens v. Town of Fultongreen2 sentences2025See Nicolaou, 113 Wis. 2d at 532-33, 536 (concluding that the bank’s mistaken belief that California law, not Wisconsin law, applied to its repossession of the defendants’ vehicle was an error of law that did not qualify as a bona fide error as that term is used in the Wisconsin Consumer Act); see also Ahrens v. Town of Fulton, 2000 WI App 268, ¶20 , 240 Wis. 2d 124 , 621 N.W.2d 643 (stating that the town’s alleged error could not be characterized as a clerical error because the owners alleged that the town intentionally, but erroneously, classified a mobile home as an improvement to real prop 2025See Nicolaou, 113 Wis. 2d at 532-33, 536 (concluding that the bank’s mistaken belief that California law, not Wisconsin law, applied to its repossession of the defendants’ vehicle was an error of law that did not qualify as a bona fide error as that term is used in the Wisconsin Consumer Act); see also Ahrens v. Town of Fulton, 2000 WI App 268, ¶20 , 240 Wis. 2d 124 , 621 N.W.2d 643 (stating that the town’s alleged error could not be characterized as a clerical error because the owners alleged that the town intentionally, but erroneously, classified a mobile home as an improvement to real prop | 1 | 1 |
State v. Richard Knutson, Inc.green2 sentences1998We previously addressed this argument in State v. Richard Knutson, Inc., 196 Wis. 2d 86, 93-107 , 537 N.W.2d 420, 422-427 (Ct. App. 1995), and we concluded that corporations may be charged with and convicted of homicide by the negligent operation of a vehicle in violation of § 940.10. 1998We previously addressed this argument in State v. Richard Knutson, Inc., 196 Wis. 2d 86, 93-107 , 537 N.W.2d 420, 422-427 (Ct. App. 1995), and we concluded that corporations may be charged with and convicted of homicide by the negligent operation of a vehicle in violation of § 940.10. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Taylorgreen2 sentences1992Id. at 42 , 417 N.W.2d at 194-95 (footnote omitted). 1992Id. at 42 , 417 N.W.2d at 194-95 (footnote omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Benavides v. Stategreen2 sentences1982Also while the [defendant] himself may not have been able to attend to the vehicle he may have been able to instruct someone to do it for him." Benavides v. State, 600 S.W.2d 809, 812 (Tex. Cr. 1982Also while the [defendant] himself may not have been able to attend to the vehicle he may have been able to instruct someone to do it for him.” Benavides v. State, 600 S.W.2d 809, 812 (Tex. Cr. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kmiec v. Town of Spider Lake
green
1 sentence2024Kmiec, 60 Wis. 2d at 645-46 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State ex rel. Tingley v. Gurda
green
1 sentence2024Tingley, 209 Wis. at 67-68 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Cady v. Dombrowski
green
1 sentence2021The deputies’ observation of the same vehicle driving a short time later—and, specifically, driving back into the same parking lot—gave rise to an objectively reasonable concern that the driver was in need of assistance, and that his continued operation of the vehicle could put both the driver and the public at risk. ¶31 Promer next argues that after the deputies saw him awake and safely driving, “this case pivoted from a community caretaker action into a criminal investigation” because the deputies’ conduct was no longer “totally divorced from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of e | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. Companies
green
2 sentences2014Cos., 2006 WI 89, ¶20 , 293 Wis. 2d 123 , 717 N.W.2d 258 ("[a] statute that is unambiguous in one context may be ambiguous in another"). ¶109 To explain further, a tail lamp is "a device to designate the rear of a vehicle by a warning light." Wis. Stat. § 340.01 (66). 2014Cos., 2006 WI 89, ¶20 , 293 Wis. 2d 123 , 717 N.W.2d 258 ("[a] statute that is unambiguous in one context may be ambiguous in another"). ¶109 To explain further, a tail lamp is "a device to designate the rear of a vehicle by a warning light." Wis. Stat. § 340.01 (66). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Doering v. State Labor & Industry Review Commission
green
1 sentence2009Nor do they distinguish McRae's commute from that made by the "typical employee." See Doering, 187 Wis. 2d at 479 . ¶ 13. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Harris
green
2 sentences2004Evans argues that such a conclusion is contrary to our decision in State v. Harris, 149 Wis. 2d 943 , 947 & n.5, 440 N.W.2d 364 (1989), wherein we opined that failure to allow the extension of a deadline to file an appeal under § (Rule) 809.82 when the defendant was deprived of counsel would implicate due process concerns because "a criminal defendant's right to appeal cannot be extinguished because of his attorney's incompetence . ..." However, Harris was decided before we concluded in Knight that a petition for a writ of habeas corpus was the proper vehicle to challenge ineffective assistanc 2004Evans argues that such a conclusion is contrary to our decision in State v. Harris, 149 Wis. 2d 943 , 947 & n.5, 440 N.W.2d 364 (1989), wherein we opined that failure to allow the extension of a deadline to file an appeal under § (Rule) 809.82 when the defendant was deprived of counsel would implicate due process concerns because "a criminal defendant's right to appeal cannot be extinguished because of his attorney's incompetence . ..." However, Harris was decided before we concluded in Knight that a petition for a writ of habeas corpus was the proper vehicle to challenge ineffective assistanc | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Bohacheff
green
2 sentences2003Bohacheff, 114 Wis. 2d at 404 . 2003Bohacheff, 114 Wis. 2d at 404 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Jensen v. State
green
1 sentence1982“By a well-established rule of pleading in criminal actions, the complaint was insufficient to charge an offense under said sec. 4595, because it does not negative the exception in the statute, viz., that the selling of the intoxicating liquor, as stated in the complaint, was not ‘a work of necessity or charity.’ ” Jensen v. State, 60 *581 Wis. 577, 579, 19 N.W. 374 (1884). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Ruby v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
neutral
2 sentences1970Co. (1967), 37 Wis. 2d 352 , 155 N. W. 2d 121 , that, when an automobile sales agency places a car held for sale in the hands of a prospective buyer and that buyer operates the vehicle on a test run with his family and not in the company of a salesman, there was no liability upon the automobile dealer for the prospective purchaser’s negligence. 1970Co. (1967), 37 Wis. 2d 352 , 155 N. W. 2d 121 , that, when an automobile sales agency places a car held for sale in the hands of a prospective buyer and that buyer operates the vehicle on a test run with his family and not in the company of a salesman, there was no liability upon the automobile dealer for the prospective purchaser’s negligence. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.