Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Nevada opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dzack v. Marshallgreen2 sentences1978Laakonen v. District Court, 91 Nev. 506, 508, n. 2 , 538 P.2d 574, 575, n. 2 (1975); Dzack v. Marshall, 80 Nev. 345 , 393 P.2d 610 (1964); NRAP 3A(b)(5). 1978Laakonen v. District Court, 91 Nev. 506, 508, n. 2 , 538 P.2d 574, 575, n. 2 (1975); Dzack v. Marshall, 80 Nev. 345 , 393 P.2d 610 (1964); NRAP 3A(b)(5). | 1 | 2 |
Johnson v. Kentnergreen2 sentences2024Id. ("[W]here an accused is detained unlawfully by reason of violation of jurisdictional procedural requirements, denial of a speedy trial, or other proper grounds, a district court may review the legality of the detention on habeas corpus."). 2024Id. ("[W]here an accused is detained unlawfully by reason of violation of jurisdictional procedural requirements, denial of a speedy trial, or other proper grounds, a district court may review the legality of the detention on habeas corpus."). | 1 | 1 |
Kay v. Nunezgreen2 sentences2021See Mesagate, 124 Nev. at 1100-01 , 194 P.3d at 1254 ; see also Kay v. Nunez, 122 Nev. 1100, 1104-05 , 146 P.3d 801, 805 (2006) (holding that judicial review, not writ relief, is generally the appropriate vehicle to challenge a local zoning and planning decision). 2021See Mesagate, 124 Nev. at 1100-01 , 194 P.3d at 1254 ; see also Kay v. Nunez, 122 Nev. 1100, 1104-05 , 146 P.3d 801, 805 (2006) (holding that judicial review, not writ relief, is generally the appropriate vehicle to challenge a local zoning and planning decision). | 1 | 1 |
Mesagate Homeowners' Ass'n v. City of Fernleygreen2 sentences2021See Mesagate, 124 Nev. at 1100-01 , 194 P.3d at 1254 ; see also Kay v. Nunez, 122 Nev. 1100, 1104-05 , 146 P.3d 801, 805 (2006) (holding that judicial review, not writ relief, is generally the appropriate vehicle to challenge a local zoning and planning decision). 2021See Mesagate, 124 Nev. at 1100-01 , 194 P.3d at 1254 ; see also Kay v. Nunez, 122 Nev. 1100, 1104-05 , 146 P.3d 801, 805 (2006) (holding that judicial review, not writ relief, is generally the appropriate vehicle to challenge a local zoning and planning decision). | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences2017See Jackson v. State, 115 Nev. 21, 23 , 973 P.2d 241, 242 (1999); see also Nev. 2017See Jackson v. State, 115 Nev. 21, 23 , 973 P.2d 241, 242 (1999); see also Nev. | 1 | 1 |
Clark County Department of Family Services v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clarkgreen1 sentence2013See In re A.B., 128 Nev. „ 291 P.3d 122, 126 (2012) (recognizing that an extraordinary writ petition was an appropriate vehicle to challenge an order that dismissed a petition alleging abuse and neglect). | 1 | 1 |
Laakonen v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of Clarkgreen2 sentences1978Laakonen v. District Court, 91 Nev. 506, 508, n. 2 , 538 P.2d 574, 575, n. 2 (1975); Dzack v. Marshall, 80 Nev. 345 , 393 P.2d 610 (1964); NRAP 3A(b)(5). 1978Laakonen v. District Court, 91 Nev. 506, 508, n. 2 , 538 P.2d 574, 575, n. 2 (1975); Dzack v. Marshall, 80 Nev. 345 , 393 P.2d 610 (1964); NRAP 3A(b)(5). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dahya v. SECOND JUDICIAL DIST. COURT
green
1 sentence2020Court, 117 Nev. 208, 211 , 19 P.3d 239 , 241 (2001). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Dahya v. Second Judicial District Court ex rel. County of Washoe
neutral
1 sentence2020Court, 117 Nev. 208, 211 , 19 P.3d 239 , 241 (2001). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Warden, Nevada State Prison v. Peters
green
2 sentences2014Id. 2014Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Holloway v. Barrett
green
2 sentences1975See Dzack v. Marshall, 80 Nev. 345 , 393 P.2d 610 (1964); Holloway v. Barrett, 87 Nev. 385 , 487 P.2d 501 (1971); State ex rel. 1975See Dzack v. Marshall, 80 Nev. 345 , 393 P.2d 610 (1964); Holloway v. Barrett, 87 Nev. 385 , 487 P.2d 501 (1971); State ex rel. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.