Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Collins v. Fostergreen2 sentences2022See Collins v. Foster, 299 Or 90 , 698 P2d 953 (1985); Haynes v. Burks, 290 Or 75 , 77 n 1, 619 P2d 632 (1980) (both consid- ering denial of pretrial release on writ of habeas corpus).” Id. at 202 . 2022See Collins v. Foster, 299 Or 90 , 698 P2d 953 (1985); Haynes v. Burks, 290 Or 75 , 77 n 1, 619 P2d 632 (1980) (both consid- ering denial of pretrial release on writ of habeas corpus).” Id. at 202 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. McKenziegreen1 sentence2020Id. at 266-67. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Donovangreen2 sentences2019“At first blush, then, the amendments to ORS 813.215 (1)(a) seem to narrow the meaning of ‘statutory counter- part’ by excluding from its ambit offenses that involve ‘the impaired driving of a vehicle’ or a violation of the BAC limit—offenses that we might otherwise conclude fall under subparagraph (A), the statutory counterpart provi- sion, as we have previously interpreted it.” 243 Or App at 196 (citations omitted). 2019The Court of Appeals then observed that that was not the only permissible read- ing of the additions and turned to the legislative history of those amendments to confirm that the legislature had not intended to narrow the meaning of “statutory counterpart.” Id. at 196-97 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Eastep
green
1 sentence2026The range of verbs, therefore, suggests that the statute covers more than “joyriding.” And, as this court has previously recognized, by its use of verbs the statute “suggests that the interest that is designed to be protected is not only the owner’s abil- ity to use a vehicle for transport, but for other purposes, as well.” Eastep, 361 Or at 753 , 755 (citing sleeping and storage as examples of “other purposes”). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Application of Haynes
green
2 sentences2022See Collins v. Foster, 299 Or 90 , 698 P2d 953 (1985); Haynes v. Burks, 290 Or 75 , 77 n 1, 619 P2d 632 (1980) (both consid- ering denial of pretrial release on writ of habeas corpus).” Id. at 202 . 2022See Collins v. Foster, 299 Or 90 , 698 P2d 953 (1985); Haynes v. Burks, 290 Or 75 , 77 n 1, 619 P2d 632 (1980) (both consid- ering denial of pretrial release on writ of habeas corpus).” Id. at 202 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Sullivan
green
1 sentence2022Cite as 322 Or App 563 (2022) 565 During the stop, defendant, who was driving, handed Shorter her Oregon ID card and explained that she did not have insurance on the vehicle and that her driver’s license was revoked. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Rico-Villalobos v. Giusto
green
2 sentences2022Habeas corpus as an appropriate vehicle to challenge pretrial detention, including bail amounts, was affirmed again in Rico-Villalobos v. Giusto, 339 Or 197 , 118 P3d 246 (2005), where the court noted: “[T]his court previously has considered habeas corpus chal- lenges to pretrial release decisions when defendants raised substantial legal issues regarding their incarceration. 2022Habeas corpus as an appropriate vehicle to challenge pretrial detention, including bail amounts, was affirmed again in Rico-Villalobos v. Giusto, 339 Or 197 , 118 P3d 246 (2005), where the court noted: “[T]his court previously has considered habeas corpus chal- lenges to pretrial release decisions when defendants raised substantial legal issues regarding their incarceration. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Martin
neutral
1 sentence2021Confrontation and cross-examination are certainly a vehicle to test reliability, Cite as 313 Or App 578 (2021) 591 but they also serve to ferret out omission. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Andersen
green
1 sentence2021State v. Andersen, 269 Or App 705 , 346 P3d 1224 (2015) (Andersen I), rev’d, 361 Or 187 (2017). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Andersen
green
2 sentences2021State v. Andersen, 269 Or App 705 , 346 P3d 1224 (2015) (Andersen I), rev’d, 361 Or 187 (2017). 2021State v. Andersen, 269 Or App 705 , 346 P3d 1224 (2015) (Andersen I), rev’d, 361 Or 187 (2017). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Arreola-Botello
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 714-15 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Civil
green
1 sentence2020Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Hall
green
2 sentences2006The state concedes that, under State v. Hall, 339 Or 7 , 115 P3d 908 (2005), which was decided after this trial, the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress. 2006The state concedes that, under State v. Hall, 339 Or 7 , 115 P3d 908 (2005), which was decided after this trial, the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.