inference waiver in Arizona

11 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1949–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (12)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Danngreen ariz · 2009 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 2 sentences 2017State v. Dann, 220 Ariz. 351, 363-64, ¶ 51 , 207 P.3d 604, 616-17 (2009). ¶7 We find no abuse of discretion. 2017State v. Dann, 220 Ariz. 351, 363-64, ¶ 51 , 207 P.3d 604, 616-17 (2009). ¶7 We find no abuse of discretion.	1	1
State v. Lovegreen arizctapp · 1985 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004 2 sentences 2004Garcia-Contreras, 191 Ariz. at 147, ¶ 13 , 953 P.2d at 539 ; State v. Love, 147 Ariz. 567, 570 , 711 P.2d 1240, 1243 (App.1985); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146, 149 , 564 P.2d 97, 100 (App.1977), overruled on other grounds, State v. Fettis, 136 Ariz. 58 , 664 P.2d 208 (1983). 2004Garcia-Contreras, 191 Ariz. at 147, ¶ 13 , 953 P.2d at 539 ; State v. Love, 147 Ariz. 567, 570 , 711 P.2d 1240, 1243 (App.1985); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146, 149 , 564 P.2d 97, 100 (App.1977), overruled on other grounds, State v. Fettis, 136 Ariz. 58 , 664 P.2d 208 (1983).	1	1
State v. Garcia-Contrerasgreen ariz · 1998 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004 2 sentences 2004Garcia-Contreras, 191 Ariz. at 147, ¶ 13 , 953 P.2d at 539 ; State v. Love, 147 Ariz. 567, 570 , 711 P.2d 1240, 1243 (App.1985); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146, 149 , 564 P.2d 97, 100 (App.1977), overruled on other grounds, State v. Fettis, 136 Ariz. 58 , 664 P.2d 208 (1983). 2004Garcia-Contreras, 191 Ariz. at 147, ¶ 13 , 953 P.2d at 539 ; State v. Love, 147 Ariz. 567, 570 , 711 P.2d 1240, 1243 (App.1985); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146, 149 , 564 P.2d 97, 100 (App.1977), overruled on other grounds, State v. Fettis, 136 Ariz. 58 , 664 P.2d 208 (1983).	1	1
State v. Cookgreen arizctapp · 1977 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004 2 sentences 2004Garcia-Contreras, 191 Ariz. at 147, ¶ 13 , 953 P.2d at 539 ; State v. Love, 147 Ariz. 567, 570 , 711 P.2d 1240, 1243 (App.1985); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146, 149 , 564 P.2d 97, 100 (App.1977), overruled on other grounds, State v. Fettis, 136 Ariz. 58 , 664 P.2d 208 (1983). 2004Garcia-Contreras, 191 Ariz. at 147, ¶ 13 , 953 P.2d at 539 ; State v. Love, 147 Ariz. 567, 570 , 711 P.2d 1240, 1243 (App.1985); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146, 149 , 564 P.2d 97, 100 (App.1977), overruled on other grounds, State v. Fettis, 136 Ariz. 58 , 664 P.2d 208 (1983).	1	1
Teller v. Industrial Commissiongreen arizctapp · 1994 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003Comm’n, 129 Ariz. 222, 225 , 630 P.2d 45, 48 (App.1981) (sustaining validity of final notice based on twenty-day letter without supporting medical documentation where claimant’s inactivity supported the inference that the claim was abandoned). ¶ 17 This court went one step further in Teller v. Industrial Commission, 179 Ariz. 367, 369 , 879 P.2d 375, 377 (App.1994). 2003Comm’n, 129 Ariz. 222, 225 , 630 P.2d 45, 48 (App.1981) (sustaining validity of final notice based on twenty-day letter without supporting medical documentation where claimant’s inactivity supported the inference that the claim was abandoned). ¶ 17 This court went one step further in Teller v. Industrial Commission, 179 Ariz. 367, 369 , 879 P.2d 375, 377 (App.1994).	1	1
Minghelli v. INDUS. COMMISSION OF ARIZONAgreen arizctapp · 1981 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003Comm’n, 129 Ariz. 222, 225 , 630 P.2d 45, 48 (App.1981) (sustaining validity of final notice based on twenty-day letter without supporting medical documentation where claimant’s inactivity supported the inference that the claim was abandoned). ¶ 17 This court went one step further in Teller v. Industrial Commission, 179 Ariz. 367, 369 , 879 P.2d 375, 377 (App.1994). 2003Comm’n, 129 Ariz. 222, 225 , 630 P.2d 45, 48 (App.1981) (sustaining validity of final notice based on twenty-day letter without supporting medical documentation where claimant’s inactivity supported the inference that the claim was abandoned). ¶ 17 This court went one step further in Teller v. Industrial Commission, 179 Ariz. 367, 369 , 879 P.2d 375, 377 (App.1994).	1	1
State v. Leegreen ariz · 1984 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996 2 sentences 1996In State v. Lee, 142 Ariz. 210, 215, 216-17 , 689 P.2d 153, 158, 159-60 (1984), this court held that: [T]he power to decide questions of trial strategy and tactics rests with counsel and the decision as to what witnesses to call is a tactical, strategic decision.... 1996In State v. Lee, 142 Ariz. 210, 215, 216-17 , 689 P.2d 153, 158, 159-60 (1984), this court held that: [T]he power to decide questions of trial strategy and tactics rests with counsel and the decision as to what witnesses to call is a tactical, strategic decision....	1	1
Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAgreen ariz · 1983 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994 1 sentence 1994See Fuenning at 596, 680 P.2d at 127; State v. White, 155 Ariz. 452, 456 , 747 P.2d 613, 617 (App.1987).	1	1
State v. Whitegreen arizctapp · 1987 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994 2 sentences 1994See Fuenning at 596, 680 P.2d at 127; State v. White, 155 Ariz. 452, 456 , 747 P.2d 613, 617 (App.1987). 1994See Fuenning at 596, 680 P.2d at 127; State v. White, 155 Ariz. 452, 456 , 747 P.2d 613, 617 (App.1987).	1	1
State v. Colemangreen arizctapp · 1987 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993 2 sentences 1993Compare Coleman, 152 Ariz. at 585 , 733 P.2d at 1168 (petitioner overcame inference of waiver where record indicated that he was unaware of necessity of raising issue by direct appeal) with State v. Smith, 169 Ariz. 243, 247 , 818 P.2d 228, 232 (App.1991) (petitioner did not overcome inference of waiver by assertion of ignorance where record was made available to him at time of direct appeal). 1993Compare Coleman, 152 Ariz. at 585 , 733 P.2d at 1168 (petitioner overcame inference of waiver where record indicated that he was unaware of necessity of raising issue by direct appeal) with State v. Smith, 169 Ariz. 243, 247 , 818 P.2d 228, 232 (App.1991) (petitioner did not overcome inference of waiver by assertion of ignorance where record was made available to him at time of direct appeal).	1	1
State v. Smithgreen arizctapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993 2 sentences 1993Compare Coleman, 152 Ariz. at 585 , 733 P.2d at 1168 (petitioner overcame inference of waiver where record indicated that he was unaware of necessity of raising issue by direct appeal) with State v. Smith, 169 Ariz. 243, 247 , 818 P.2d 228, 232 (App.1991) (petitioner did not overcome inference of waiver by assertion of ignorance where record was made available to him at time of direct appeal). 1993Compare Coleman, 152 Ariz. at 585 , 733 P.2d at 1168 (petitioner overcame inference of waiver where record indicated that he was unaware of necessity of raising issue by direct appeal) with State v. Smith, 169 Ariz. 243, 247 , 818 P.2d 228, 232 (App.1991) (petitioner did not overcome inference of waiver by assertion of ignorance where record was made available to him at time of direct appeal).	1	1
People v. Gainesgreen calctapp · 1980 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985 1 sentence 1985In view of the discerned objective[s] of [such statutes], it is enough that the prosecution produce evidence of a gun designed to shoot and which gives the appearance of shooting capability’ And where the accused shall himself produce evidence on the point, resolution of the conflict raised by the People’s evidence or the inference or presumption therefrom is a factual issue to be resolved by the trier of fact.” 162 Cal.Rptr. at 832-33 [citations omitted].	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Fettis green ariz · 1983 2 sentences 2004Garcia-Contreras, 191 Ariz. at 147, ¶ 13 , 953 P.2d at 539 ; State v. Love, 147 Ariz. 567, 570 , 711 P.2d 1240, 1243 (App.1985); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146, 149 , 564 P.2d 97, 100 (App.1977), overruled on other grounds, State v. Fettis, 136 Ariz. 58 , 664 P.2d 208 (1983). 2004Garcia-Contreras, 191 Ariz. at 147, ¶ 13 , 953 P.2d at 539 ; State v. Love, 147 Ariz. 567, 570 , 711 P.2d 1240, 1243 (App.1985); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146, 149 , 564 P.2d 97, 100 (App.1977), overruled on other grounds, State v. Fettis, 136 Ariz. 58 , 664 P.2d 208 (1983).	1	2004–2004
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Superior Court green arizctapp · 1994 1 sentence 1999The jury heard evidence indicating an inherent margin of error with the testing' device, and “it was up to the jury to make the inference whether the test result combined with the other evidence showed intoxication at the time of the arrest.” Id.	1	1999–1999
Faretta v. California green scotus · 1975 2 sentences 1996In State v. Lee, 142 Ariz. 210, 215, 216-17 , 689 P.2d 153, 158, 159-60 (1984), this court held that: . [T]he power to decide questions of trial strategy and tactics rests with counsel and the decision as to what witnesses to call is a tactical, strategic decision---- Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and the A.B.A. 1996In State v. Lee, 142 Ariz. 210, 215, 216-17 , 689 P.2d 153, 158, 159-60 (1984), this court held that: . [T]he power to decide questions of trial strategy and tactics rests with counsel and the decision as to what witnesses to call is a tactical, strategic decision---- Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and the A.B.A.	1	1996–1996
State v. Carriger green ariz · 1984 2 sentences 1993State v. Carriger, 143 Ariz. 142, 146 , 692 P.2d 991, 995 , cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct. 2347 , 85 L.Ed.2d 864 (1984); Ariz. R.Crim.P. 32.2(c) (1987). 1993State v. Carriger, 143 Ariz. 142, 146 , 692 P.2d 991, 995 , cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct. 2347 , 85 L.Ed.2d 864 (1984); Ariz. R.Crim.P. 32.2(c) (1987).	1	1993–1993
In re Bernstein green scotus · 1985 1 sentence 1993State v. Carriger, 143 Ariz. 142, 146 , 692 P.2d 991, 995 , cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct. 2347 , 85 L.Ed.2d 864 (1984); Ariz. R.Crim.P. 32.2(c) (1987).	1	1993–1993
Baldwin-United Corp. v. Eubanks green scotus · 1985 1 sentence 1993State v. Carriger, 143 Ariz. 142, 146 , 692 P.2d 991, 995 , cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct. 2347 , 85 L.Ed.2d 864 (1984); Ariz. R.Crim.P. 32.2(c) (1987).	1	1993–1993
State v. Gatewood green kan · 1950 2 sentences 1969Ex parte Seyfried, supra; State v. Gatewood, 169 Kan. 679 , 221 P.2d 392 (1950) ; Vickery v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 311 , 137 S.W. 687 (1911) ; People v. Rhodes, 137 Cal.App. 385 , 30 P.2d 1026 (1934). 1969Ex parte Seyfried, supra; State v. Gatewood, 169 Kan. 679 , 221 P.2d 392 (1950) ; Vickery v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 311 , 137 S.W. 687 (1911) ; People v. Rhodes, 137 Cal.App. 385 , 30 P.2d 1026 (1934).	1	1969–1969
People v. Rhodes green calctapp · 1934 2 sentences 1969Ex parte Seyfried, supra; State v. Gatewood, 169 Kan. 679 , 221 P.2d 392 (1950) ; Vickery v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 311 , 137 S.W. 687 (1911) ; People v. Rhodes, 137 Cal.App. 385 , 30 P.2d 1026 (1934). 1969Ex parte Seyfried, supra; State v. Gatewood, 169 Kan. 679 , 221 P.2d 392 (1950) ; Vickery v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 311 , 137 S.W. 687 (1911) ; People v. Rhodes, 137 Cal.App. 385 , 30 P.2d 1026 (1934).	1	1969–1969
Vickery v. State neutral texcrimapp · 1911 2 sentences 1969Ex parte Seyfried, supra; State v. Gatewood, 169 Kan. 679 , 221 P.2d 392 (1950) ; Vickery v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 311 , 137 S.W. 687 (1911) ; People v. Rhodes, 137 Cal.App. 385 , 30 P.2d 1026 (1934). 1969Ex parte Seyfried, supra; State v. Gatewood, 169 Kan. 679 , 221 P.2d 392 (1950) ; Vickery v. State, 62 Tex.Cr.R. 311 , 137 S.W. 687 (1911) ; People v. Rhodes, 137 Cal.App. 385 , 30 P.2d 1026 (1934).	1	1969–1969
Lunsford v. Tucson Aviation Corp. green ariz · 1952 2 sentences 1956In Lunsford v. Tucson Aviation Corp., 73 Ariz. 277 , 240 P.2d 545, 546 , we held that an air carrier must exercise "the highest degree of care consistent with the practical operation of the plane ” This does not mean that merely because an accident arises out of the use of a common carrier that it creates an inference or presumption of negligence on the part of a carrier. 1956In Lunsford v. Tucson Aviation Corp., 73 Ariz. 277 , 240 P.2d 545, 546 , we held that an air carrier must exercise "the highest degree of care consistent with the practical operation of the plane ” This does not mean that merely because an accident arises out of the use of a common carrier that it creates an inference or presumption of negligence on the part of a carrier.	1	1956–1956
Middle States Utilities Co. v. Incorporated Telephone Co. green iowa · 1937 2 sentences 1949Middle States Utilities Co. v. Incorporated Telephone Co., 222 Iowa 1275 , 271 N.W. 180 , 109 A.L.R. 66 ; McCarthy v. Odell, 202 App. Div. 784 , 195 N.Y.S. 80 . 1949Middle States Utilities Co. v. Incorporated Telephone Co., 222 Iowa 1275 , 271 N.W. 180 , 109 A.L.R. 66 ; McCarthy v. Odell, 202 App. Div. 784 , 195 N.Y.S. 80 .	1	1949–1949
Niagara Falls Power Co. v. Pettebone-Cataract Paper Co. neutral nyappdiv · 1922 1 sentence 1949Middle States Utilities Co. v. Incorporated Telephone Co., 222 Iowa 1275 , 271 N.W. 180 , 109 A.L.R. 66 ; McCarthy v. Odell, 202 App. Div. 784 , 195 N.Y.S. 80 .	1	1949–1949

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-120.21 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 101 (1887–2025) CA 93 (1897–2025) PA 63 (1869–2025) LA 62 (1943–2019) NY 57 (1894–2021) IL 55 (1870–2026) GA 48 (1913–2024) MI 36 (1910–2026) AL 31 (1894–2011) OH 29 (1926–2024) OR 28 (1899–2026) MD 27 (1913–2020) IN 26 (1914–2020) NC 26 (1931–2021) VA 23 (1918–2014) MO 23 (1904–2024) MA 23 (1902–2013) MN 22 (1902–2017) WA 21 (1914–2024) TN 18 (1927–2015) CT 17 (1953–2022) FL 17 (1939–2019) NJ 15 (1957–2026) OK 14 (1915–1995) KS 14 (1934–2013) IA 13 (1913–2021) CO 13 (1946–2018) WV 12 (1887–2019) AZ 11 (1949–2017) MT 11 (1902–2025) DE 11 (1950–2026) ID 11 (1959–2022) UT 8 (1913–2026) SD 8 (1971–2003) KY 7 (1940–2025) RI 7 (1983–2024) AR 7 (1939–1998) HI 6 (1990–2024) WY 6 (1978–2007) NE 6 (1931–2015) NM 5 (1995–2023) MS 5 (1970–2008) SC 5 (1926–1986) VT 5 (1992–2013) WI 4 (1910–2024) DC 4 (1987–2011) NH 3 (1962–2014) NV 3 (1969–1988) ND 3 (1969–2014) ME 2 (2003–2014) AK 2 (2016–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check