10 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1920–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nooner v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See, e.g., Nooner, 2014 Ark. 296 , 438 S.W.3d 233 (defining a “breakdown of the appellate process” as an error alleged to have been made by this court during the course of its appellate review). 2015See, e.g., Nooner, 2014 Ark. 296 , 438 S.W.3d 233 (defining a “breakdown of the appellate process” as an error alleged to have been made by this court during the course of its appellate review). | 1 | 1 |
Ivers v. Arkansas Department of Human Servicesgreen1 sentence2008App. 57, 67 , 250 S.W.3d 279, 285 (2007), we conclude that the court made an error of law requiring reversal. | 1 | 1 |
Hollamon v. Stategreen2 sentences1995See Hollamon v. State, 312 Ark. 48 , 846 S.W.2d 663 (1993). 1995See Hollamon v. State, 312 Ark. 48 , 846 S.W.2d 663 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
BPS, Inc. v. Richardson
green
2 sentences2003I would add mention of BPS, Inc. v. Richardson, 341 Ark. 834 , 20 S.W.3d 403 (2000), since the majority seems to rely on that decision in ruling as it does. 2003I would add mention of BPS, Inc. v. Richardson, 341 Ark. 834 , 20 S.W.3d 403 (2000), since the majority seems to rely on that decision in ruling as it does. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Boynton v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.
neutral
2 sentences2001In Pinson, supra, the court cited Boynton v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co., 84 Ark. 203 , 105 S. W. 77 (1907), where the court made the rule clear: [T]he weight of judicial opinion, as well as sound reason, is that, when a case which is removed to an appellate court by a writ of error or an appeal is not there tried de novo, but the record made below is simply re-examined, 'and the judgment either reversed or affirmed, such an appeal or writ of error does not vacate the judgment below or prevent it from being pleaded and given in evidence as an estoppel upon issues which were tried and determined, 2001In Pinson, supra, the court cited Boynton v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co., 84 Ark. 203 , 105 S. W. 77 (1907), where the court made the rule clear: [T]he weight of judicial opinion, as well as sound reason, is that, when a case which is removed to an appellate court by a writ of error or an appeal is not there tried de novo, but the record made below is simply re-examined, 'and the judgment either reversed or affirmed, such an appeal or writ of error does not vacate the judgment below or prevent it from being pleaded and given in evidence as an estoppel upon issues which were tried and determined, | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Faretta v. California
green
1 sentence2001Indeed, it is apparent from the record that the trial court made no inquiry into Hatfield’s understanding of the risks and dangers of representing himself, even though attorney Harrod volunteered to the court that Hatfield’s “case methodology” did not match the “defense method.” While an assessment of how well or poorly Hatfield mastered the intricacies of the law is not relevant to an assessment of his knowing exercise of the right to defend himself, see Faretta, supra, it is evident from the record that, from his conduct before and during trial, he could not have understood the disadvantages | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Rush v. State
neutral
2 sentences1998In keeping with Rush v. State, 252 Ark. 814 , 481 S.W.2d 696 (1972), the trial court made an inquiry as to the whereabouts of the purported statement. 1998In keeping with Rush v. State, 252 Ark. 814 , 481 S.W.2d 696 (1972), the trial court made an inquiry as to the whereabouts of the purported statement. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Colbert v. State
green
2 sentences1997The majority, relying upon decisions by our supreme court beginning with Colbert v. State, 304 Ark. 250 , 801 S.W.2d 643 (1990), has affirmed that ruling. 1997The majority, relying upon decisions by our supreme court beginning with Colbert v. State, 304 Ark. 250 , 801 S.W.2d 643 (1990), has affirmed that ruling. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Harrison v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
neutral
2 sentences1963Considering all the evidence, with every reasonable inference arising therefrom, in the light most favorable to appellees, as we do to determine whether a jury question was presented, Harrison v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., 230 Ark. 630 , 326 S. W. 2d 803 , we find that the trial court made no error in refusing to direct a verdict for appellant. 1963Considering all the evidence, with every reasonable inference arising therefrom, in the light most favorable to appellees, as we do to determine whether a jury question was presented, Harrison v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., 230 Ark. 630 , 326 S. W. 2d 803 , we find that the trial court made no error in refusing to direct a verdict for appellant. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Cassady v. Norris
green
1 sentence1920We do not think the decision in Cassady v. Norris, supra, concludes the present case. | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.