made rule in Tennessee

2013On the other hand, “where an illegal sentence is imposed pursuant to a plea agreement but is not a material (bargained-for) element of the agreement, the illegal sentence may be corrected in habeas corpus, but the conviction will remain intact,” Edwards, 269 S.W.3d at 928 , and the petitioner is afforded no opportunity to withdraw his plea, see Smith, 202 S.W.3d at 130 (“Rather, the record in this case demonstrates that the trial court made an error sua sponte and independent of the plea bargain.

2011Smith v. Lewis, 202 S.W.3d 124, 130 (Tenn. 2006).

2007In support of her argument advocating change, Plaintiff cites, among other things, Broadwell v. Holmes, and quotes: This Court has a continuing duty to consider whether the common-law, as created and developed through case law, is obsolete. “ ‘[W]e abdicate our own function, in a field peculiarly non-statutory, when we refuse to consider an old and court made rule.’ ” Hanover v. Ruch, 809 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 381 , 116 L.Ed.2d 332 (1991) (quoting Kilbourne v. Hanzelik, 648 S.W.2d 932, 934 (Tenn.1983)[)].

1994This Court has a continuing duty to consider whether the common-law, as created and developed through case law, is obsolete. “ ‘[W]e abdicate our own function, in a field peculiarly non-statutory, when we refuse to consider an old and court made rule.’ ” Hanover v. Ruch, 809 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Tenn.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 381 , 116 L.Ed.2d 332 (1991) (quoting Kilbourne v. Hanzelik, 648 S.W.2d 932, 934 (Tenn.1983).

2007In support of her argument advocating change, Plaintiff cites, among other things, Broadwell v. Holmes, and quotes: This Court has a continuing duty to consider whether the common-law, as created and developed through case law, is obsolete. “ ‘[W]e abdicate our own function, in a field peculiarly non-statutory, when we refuse to consider an old and court made rule.’ ” Hanover v. Ruch, 809 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 381 , 116 L.Ed.2d 332 (1991) (quoting Kilbourne v. Hanzelik, 648 S.W.2d 932, 934 (Tenn.1983)[)].

1994This Court has a continuing duty to consider whether the common-law, as created and developed through case law, is obsolete. “ ‘[W]e abdicate our own function, in a field peculiarly non-statutory, when we refuse to consider an old and court made rule.’ ” Hanover v. Ruch, 809 S.W.2d 893, 896 (Tenn.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 381 , 116 L.Ed.2d 332 (1991) (quoting Kilbourne v. Hanzelik, 648 S.W.2d 932, 934 (Tenn.1983).

2010Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064 (1984).

2010Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064 (1984).

2023Hayes v. State, 809 S.E.2d 832, 834-35 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018) (rejecting the defendant’s claim that his decision to proceed pro se upon entry of guilty plea was invalid where prior to accepting the defendant’s plea, the trial court inquired as to his examination of the guilty-plea form with the assistance of counsel; his discussion of the underlying facts and potential defenses with counsel; and his satisfaction with counsel’s representation; defendant conferred with counsel during the guilty-plea hearing; defendant’s attorney interjected questions when the trial court made inquiry into defendant

2007Broadwell v. Holmes, 871 S.W.2d 471, 473 (Tenn.1994).

2006See Small, 988 S.W.2d at 673 .

1994While recognizing the prece-dential value of prior case law is required to maintain uniformity and consistency in the law, a “mindless obedience to this precept can confound the search for truth and foster an attitude of contempt.” Davis v. Davis, 657 S.W.2d 753, 758 (Tenn.1983); see also Hanover v. Ruch, 809 S.W.2d 893, 898 (Tenn.1991).