6 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1971–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
KV v. Stategreen2 sentences2007See, e.g., K.V. v. State, 832 So. 2d 264, 265-66 (Fla. App. 2002) (“The abuse of discretion standard applies in cases where the proponent of the evidence is seeking to have it come in under a hearsay exception. . . . 2007However, the court reviews the trial court's ultimate legal conclusion, as to whether the hearsay statement is admissible under an exception to the hearsay rule, to determine if the trial court made an error of law." [Citations omitted.]). [10] See, e.g., K.V. v. State, 832 So.2d 264, 265-66 (Fla.App.2002) ("The abuse of discretion standard applies in cases where the proponent of the evidence is seeking to have it come in under a hearsay exception. . . . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Elliott v. City of Waterbury
green
2 sentences2001Rep. 359 (1788)." Giannitti v. Stamford, supra, 79. 2 The Connecticut Supreme Court has stated "municipalities and their employees or agents have immunity from negligence liability for governmental acts involving the exercise of judgment or discretion. " Elliott v. Waterbury, 245 Conn. 385 , 411 , 715 A.2d 27 (1998). 2001Rep. 359 (1788)." Giannitti v. Stamford, supra, 79. 2 The Connecticut Supreme Court has stated "municipalities and their employees or agents have immunity from negligence liability for governmental acts involving the exercise of judgment or discretion. " Elliott v. Waterbury, 245 Conn. 385 , 411 , 715 A.2d 27 (1998). | 2 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Troupe
green
2 sentences2016Preliminarily, I note my agreement with the majority and "the overwhelming majority of other jurisdictions that the generally applicable rules of evidence are insufficient to remedy potential juror bias against victims who delay in reporting a sexual assault." (Emphasis added.) Given that starting point, it is significant that the majority concludes, correctly, I believe, that the trial court in the present case properly instructed the jury on the use of constancy of accusation evidence because those instructions "accurately portrayed the law and did not mislead the jury" or "cause the defenda 2016Preliminarily, I note my agreement with the majority and "the overwhelming majority of other jurisdictions that the generally applicable rules of evidence are insufficient to remedy potential juror bias against victims who delay in reporting a sexual assault." (Emphasis added.) Given that starting point, it is significant that the majority concludes, correctly, I believe, that the trial court in the present case properly instructed the jury on the use of constancy of accusation evidence because those instructions "accurately portrayed the law and did not mislead the jury" or "cause the defenda | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Thompson v. Commissioner of Correction
green
1 sentence2013For this reason, we “will not consider claims not raised in the habeas petition or [not] decided by the habeas court." (Emphasis added.) Henderson v. Commissioner of Correction, 129 Conn. App. 188, 198 , 19 A.3d 705 , cert. denied, 303 Conn. 901 , 31 A.3d 1177 (2011). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Henderson v. Commissioner of Correction
green
2 sentences2013For this reason, we “will not consider claims not raised in the habeas petition or [not] decided by the habeas court." (Emphasis added.) Henderson v. Commissioner of Correction, 129 Conn. App. 188, 198 , 19 A.3d 705 , cert. denied, 303 Conn. 901 , 31 A.3d 1177 (2011). 2013For this reason, we “will not consider claims not raised in the habeas petition or [not] decided by the habeas court." (Emphasis added.) Henderson v. Commissioner of Correction, 129 Conn. App. 188, 198 , 19 A.3d 705 , cert. denied, 303 Conn. 901 , 31 A.3d 1177 (2011). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
McKeon v. Lennon
green
1 sentence2013For this reason, we “will not consider claims not raised in the habeas petition or [not] decided by the habeas court." (Emphasis added.) Henderson v. Commissioner of Correction, 129 Conn. App. 188, 198 , 19 A.3d 705 , cert. denied, 303 Conn. 901 , 31 A.3d 1177 (2011). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Klingeman v. MacKay
green
1 sentence2001Rep. 359 (1788)." Giannitti v. Stamford, 25 Conn. App. 67 , 79 , 593 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 918 , 597 A.2d 333 (1991). 5 The Connecticut Supreme Court has stated "municipalities and their employees or agents have immunity from negligence liability for governmental acts involving the exercise of judgment or discretion." CT Page 16310 Elliott v. Waterbury, 245 Conn. 385 , 411 , 715 A.2d 27 (1998). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Geisler
green
1 sentence2001Rep. 359 (1788)." Giannitti v. Stamford, 25 Conn. App. 67 , 79 , 593 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 918 , 597 A.2d 333 (1991). 5 The Connecticut Supreme Court has stated "municipalities and their employees or agents have immunity from negligence liability for governmental acts involving the exercise of judgment or discretion." CT Page 16310 Elliott v. Waterbury, 245 Conn. 385 , 411 , 715 A.2d 27 (1998). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Giannitti v. City of Stamford
green
2 sentences2001Rep. 359 (1788)." Giannitti v. Stamford, 25 Conn. App. 67 , 79 , 593 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 918 , 597 A.2d 333 (1991). 5 The Connecticut Supreme Court has stated "municipalities and their employees or agents have immunity from negligence liability for governmental acts involving the exercise of judgment or discretion." CT Page 16310 Elliott v. Waterbury, 245 Conn. 385 , 411 , 715 A.2d 27 (1998). 2001Rep. 359 (1788)." Giannitti v. Stamford, 25 Conn. App. 67 , 79 , 593 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 918 , 597 A.2d 333 (1991). 5 The Connecticut Supreme Court has stated "municipalities and their employees or agents have immunity from negligence liability for governmental acts involving the exercise of judgment or discretion." CT Page 16310 Elliott v. Waterbury, 245 Conn. 385 , 411 , 715 A.2d 27 (1998). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Boykin v. Alabama
green
2 sentences1971The plaintiff relies on the holding in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 , 89 S. Ct. 1709 , 23 L. 1971The plaintiff relies on the holding in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 , 89 S. Ct. 1709 , 23 L. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.