Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1942–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ratliff v. Ratliffgreen1 sentence2016See, e.g., Ratliff v. Ratliff, 804 N.E.2d 237, 246 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004) (affirming court’s finding of income where income supported by evidence in the record). | 1 | 1 |
Gerber v. Gerbergreen1 sentence2015See Gerber v. Gerber, 476 N.E.2d 531, 532 (Ind. Ct. App. 1985) (“modification of Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 02A03-1408-DR-282 | April 10, 2015 Page 6 of 7 custody is warranted only when the moving party shows a decisive change in conditions in the custodial home”). [11] Mother submitted reports from the 2013-2014 school year showing Is.D. was involved in an Individual Education Program (IEP) and had passing grades. | 1 | 1 |
Koehler v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See Jackson v. State, 441 N.E.2d 29, 33 (Ind. Ct. App. 1982).1 1 We note that is his appellate brief, Wilson relies on Koehler v. State, 499 N.E.2d 196 (Ind. 1986), as standing for the proposition that a new standby counsel should be appointed when a defendant is dissatisfied with his current counsel and decides to proceed pro se. | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See Jackson v. State, 441 N.E.2d 29, 33 (Ind. Ct. App. 1982).1 1 We note that is his appellate brief, Wilson relies on Koehler v. State, 499 N.E.2d 196 (Ind. 1986), as standing for the proposition that a new standby counsel should be appointed when a defendant is dissatisfied with his current counsel and decides to proceed pro se. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Economic Freedom Fundgreen1 sentence2014Freedom Fund, 959 N.E.2d 794, 800 (Ind.2011), reh’g denied, cert. denied. — U.S.-, 138 S.Ct. 218 , 184 L.Ed.2d 43 (2012)). | 1 | 1 |
Pearson v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Pearson v. State, 883 N.E.2d 770, 773 (Ind. 2008) (no inquiry into ability to pay is required when restitution is part of executed sentence rather than being a condition of probation). | 1 | 1 |
State Ex Rel. Simpson v. Schwarzgreen2 sentences2006Simpson v. Schwarz, 250 Wis.2d 214 , 640 N.W.2d 527, 533 (App.2001). 2006Simpson v. Schwarz, 250 Wis.2d 214 , 640 N.W.2d 527, 533 (App.2001). | 1 | 1 |
State Ex Rel. Agan v. HENDRICKS SUP. CT., GIBBS, JUDGEgreen2 sentences2005Agan v. Hendricks Superior Court, 250 Ind. 675, 678 , 235 N.E.2d 458, 460 (1968)). 2005Agan v. Hendricks Superior Court, 250 Ind. 675, 678 , 235 N.E.2d 458, 460 (1968)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Walker v. Cuppett
green
1 sentence2016Id. [10] In the event the trial court made an error in denying Father’s request to exclude evidence from DCS, any error made was harmless. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Enservco, Inc. v. Indiana Securities Division
green
2 sentences2016Only when an alleged fraud under Sections 27(2) and 27(3) is committed by future promise or representation or prediction did the legislature explicitly incorporate the mental state of “not made honestly or in good faith.” Id. at 423 n.11. 2016Although the franchise chart uses the term 12 As the Class contends and Stratus concedes, the trial court made an error of law in finding that “Plaintiffs have the burden of demonstrating that the violations . . . were not made in good faith or honest dealing.” (App. 229.) Section 27(2) and (3) do not include a scienter requirement when an alleged violation involves false statements or omissions, and in this way “operate as strict liability provisions[.]” Enservco, 623 N.E.2d at 423 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Larremore v. Lykes Bros., Inc.
neutral
1 sentence2014Freedom Fund, 959 N.E.2d 794, 800 (Ind.2011), reh’g denied, cert. denied. — U.S.-, 138 S.Ct. 218 , 184 L.Ed.2d 43 (2012)). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Laursen v. United States
neutral
1 sentence2014Freedom Fund, 959 N.E.2d 794, 800 (Ind.2011), reh’g denied, cert. denied. — U.S.-, 138 S.Ct. 218 , 184 L.Ed.2d 43 (2012)). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Equicor Development, Inc. v. Westfield-Washington Township Plan Commission
green
1 sentence2005In Equicor, this Court made an exception to the general rule that "government entities are not subject to equitable estoppel." Id. at 39 (citing State ex rel. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Attica Building & Loan Ass'n v. Colvert
green
1 sentence1942Attica, Bldg. & Loan Assn. v. Colvert (1939), 216 Ind. 192 , 23 N. E. (2d) 483. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.