Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1901–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Honolulu Star Bulletin, Ltd. v. Burnsgreen2 sentences2011See State v. Hussein, 122 Hawai'i 495, 529 , 229 P.3d 313, 347 (2010) (“Where the legislature fails to act in response to our statutory interpretation, the consequence is that the statutory interpretation of the court must be considered to have the tacit approval of the legislature and the effect of legislation.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Honolulu Star Bulletin, Ltd. v. Burns, 50 Haw. 603, 607 , 446 P.2d 171, 173 (1968) (concluding that the legislature’s failure to give the statute a different meaning after it was construed by the court, despite ample opportunity to do 2011See State v. Hussein, 122 Hawai'i 495, 529 , 229 P.3d 313, 347 (2010) (“Where the legislature fails to act in response to our statutory interpretation, the consequence is that the statutory interpretation of the court must be considered to have the tacit approval of the legislature and the effect of legislation.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Honolulu Star Bulletin, Ltd. v. Burns, 50 Haw. 603, 607 , 446 P.2d 171, 173 (1968) (concluding that the legislature’s failure to give the statute a different meaning after it was construed by the court, despite ample opportunity to do | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hussein.green2 sentences2011See State v. Hussein, 122 Hawai'i 495, 529 , 229 P.3d 313, 347 (2010) (“Where the legislature fails to act in response to our statutory interpretation, the consequence is that the statutory interpretation of the court must be considered to have the tacit approval of the legislature and the effect of legislation.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Honolulu Star Bulletin, Ltd. v. Burns, 50 Haw. 603, 607 , 446 P.2d 171, 173 (1968) (concluding that the legislature’s failure to give the statute a different meaning after it was construed by the court, despite ample opportunity to do 2011See State v. Hussein, 122 Hawai'i 495, 529 , 229 P.3d 313, 347 (2010) (“Where the legislature fails to act in response to our statutory interpretation, the consequence is that the statutory interpretation of the court must be considered to have the tacit approval of the legislature and the effect of legislation.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Honolulu Star Bulletin, Ltd. v. Burns, 50 Haw. 603, 607 , 446 P.2d 171, 173 (1968) (concluding that the legislature’s failure to give the statute a different meaning after it was construed by the court, despite ample opportunity to do | 1 | 1 |
Westaff USA) Inc. v. Arcegreen1 sentence2006Westaff (USA) Inc. v. Arce, 298 F.3d 1164, 1167 (9th Cir.2002); Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust for Southern California v. Vonderharr, 384 F.3d 667, 672-73 (9th Cir.2004). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 787860green1 sentence2006Westaff (USA) Inc. v. Arce, 298 F.3d 1164, 1167 (9th Cir.2002); Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust for Southern California v. Vonderharr, 384 F.3d 667, 672-73 (9th Cir.2004). | 1 | 1 |
Inmates of B-Block v. Jeffesgreen2 sentences1998See, e.g., Division of Child Support Enforcement v. Smallwood, 526 A.2d 1353, 1355 (Del.1987) (“The requirement of mutuality of obligation is the basis for finding a waiver of sovereign immunity whenever the State enters into a contractual relationship which may require judicial enforcement.”); Fru-Con Constr., 426 S.E.2d at 910 (“The constitutional waiver of sovereign immunity in contract actions against the state is not limited to a waiver of only certain elements of recoverable compensatory damages.” (Emphasis in original.)); Inmates of B-Block v. Jeffes, 87 Pa.Cmwlth. 98 , 483 A.2d 569, 57 1998See, e.g., Division of Child Support Enforcement v. Smallwood, 526 A.2d 1353, 1355 (Del.1987) (“The requirement of mutuality of obligation is the basis for finding a waiver of sovereign immunity whenever the State enters into a contractual relationship which may require judicial enforcement.”); Fru-Con Constr., 426 S.E.2d at 910 (“The constitutional waiver of sovereign immunity in contract actions against the state is not limited to a waiver of only certain elements of recoverable compensatory damages.” (Emphasis in original.)); Inmates of B-Block v. Jeffes, 87 Pa.Cmwlth. 98 , 483 A.2d 569, 57 | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of R.M.H.green1 sentence1998See, e.g., Division of Child Support Enforcement v. Smallwood, 526 A.2d 1353, 1355 (Del.1987) (“The requirement of mutuality of obligation is the basis for finding a waiver of sovereign immunity whenever the State enters into a contractual relationship which may require judicial enforcement.”); Fru-Con Constr., 426 S.E.2d at 910 (“The constitutional waiver of sovereign immunity in contract actions against the state is not limited to a waiver of only certain elements of recoverable compensatory damages.” (Emphasis in original.)); Inmates of B-Block v. Jeffes, 87 Pa.Cmwlth. 98 , 483 A.2d 569, 57 | 1 | 1 |
Division of Child Support Enforcement v. Smallwoodgreen1 sentence1998See, e.g., Division of Child Support Enforcement v. Smallwood, 526 A.2d 1353, 1355 (Del.1987) (“The requirement of mutuality of obligation is the basis for finding a waiver of sovereign immunity whenever the State enters into a contractual relationship which may require judicial enforcement.”); Fru-Con Constr., 426 S.E.2d at 910 (“The constitutional waiver of sovereign immunity in contract actions against the state is not limited to a waiver of only certain elements of recoverable compensatory damages.” (Emphasis in original.)); Inmates of B-Block v. Jeffes, 87 Pa.Cmwlth. 98 , 483 A.2d 569, 57 | 1 | 1 |
Department of Transportation v. Fru-Con Construction Corp.green1 sentence1998See, e.g., Division of Child Support Enforcement v. Smallwood, 526 A.2d 1353, 1355 (Del.1987) (“The requirement of mutuality of obligation is the basis for finding a waiver of sovereign immunity whenever the State enters into a contractual relationship which may require judicial enforcement.”); Fru-Con Constr., 426 S.E.2d at 910 (“The constitutional waiver of sovereign immunity in contract actions against the state is not limited to a waiver of only certain elements of recoverable compensatory damages.” (Emphasis in original.)); Inmates of B-Block v. Jeffes, 87 Pa.Cmwlth. 98 , 483 A.2d 569, 57 | 1 | 1 |
Fisher, Brown & Co. v. Fieldinggreen1 sentence1901Two decisions which, though arising out of the interpretation of particular statutes, are. valuable for the light which, they throw on the question of the sufficiency of such an allegation as that contained in this plaintiff’s declaration, are those in the cases of Brownell v. The Town of Greenwich, 114 N. Y. 518, 527 , and Fisher, Brown & Co. v. Fielding, 67 Conn. 91, 102, 103 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Katz v. United States
green
2 sentences1980Id. 1980Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967); State v. Texeira, S. C. | 2 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.
green
2 sentences2015Justice White noted that arbitrators should not be held to the same standards as judges, id. at 150 , 89 S.Ct. 337 (White, J„ concurring), but found that "for present purposes" it was sufficient to "hold ... that where the arbitrator has a substantial interest in a firm which has done more than trivial business with a party, that fact must be disclosed,” id. at 151-52 , 89 S.Ct. 337 (White, J., concurring). 2015Justice White noted that arbitrators should not be held to the same standards as judges, id. at 150 , 89 S.Ct. 337 (White, J„ concurring), but found that "for present purposes" it was sufficient to "hold ... that where the arbitrator has a substantial interest in a firm which has done more than trivial business with a party, that fact must be disclosed,” id. at 151-52 , 89 S.Ct. 337 (White, J., concurring). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Aha Hui Malama O Kaniakapupu v. Land Use Commission
green
2 sentences2010Id. at 133-34, 139 P.3d at 721-22 . 2010Id. at 133-34, 139 P.3d at 721-22 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Sato v. Tawata
green
1 sentence1995The dissent only states that "Tawata could have introduced other evidence having more probative value and less likelihood of prejudice.... such as: (1) Dr. Rogers's testimony that Sato was capable of returning to part-time sedentary work as early as August 1990; (2) the fact that Sato was also able to drive his wife to work; and (3) the fact that Sato volunteered at the Mo`ili`ili Community Center, where he cooked, shopped, and exercised with his elderly clients." Id. at 25, 897 P.2d at 952 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Boston Medical Supply Co. v. Lea & Febiger
green
1 sentence1964While there is authority for the view that the rule authorizes the trial court to so act as to permit an appeal in a *483 multiple-party case where the dismissal of a claim' was not as to all defendants (see e.g., Boston Medical Supply Co. v. Lea & Febiger, 1 Cir., 1952, 195 F.2d 853 ) the weight of authority, and we think the better reasoning, is that Eule 54(b) does not authorize the trial court to pave the way for an appeal in such a situation. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Steiner v. Century-Fox Film Corporation
green
1 sentence1964In Steiner v. 20th Century-Fox Film Corporation, 9 Cir., 1955, 220 F.2d 105 , it is stated at p. 107: “This case involves only multiple parties — not multiple claims. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Brownell v. . Town of Greenwich
green
1 sentence1901Two decisions which, though arising out of the interpretation of particular statutes, are. valuable for the light which, they throw on the question of the sufficiency of such an allegation as that contained in this plaintiff’s declaration, are those in the cases of Brownell v. The Town of Greenwich, 114 N. Y. 518, 527 , and Fisher, Brown & Co. v. Fielding, 67 Conn. 91, 102, 103 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.