10 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1925–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Van Zwol v. Branongreen2 sentences2010See Van Zwol v. Branon, 440 N.W.2d 589, 593 (Iowa 1989) (rejecting “initial permission” rule, which holds “ ‘that when permission to use a vehicle is initially given, subsequent use short of actual conversion or theft, remains permissive within the meaning of the omnibus clause, even if such use ... was outside any limitation placed upon the initial grant of permission’” (quoting Milbank Mut. 2010See Van Zwol v. Branon, 440 N.W.2d 589, 593 (Iowa 1989) (rejecting “initial permission” rule, which holds “ ‘that when permission to use a vehicle is initially given, subsequent use short of actual conversion or theft, remains permissive within the meaning of the omnibus clause, even if such use . . . was outside any limitation placed upon the initial grant of permission’ ” (quoting Milbank Mut. | 2 | 2 |
Richard v. Louisiana Newpack Shrimp Co.green1 sentence2013Newpack Shrimp Co., 82 So.3d 541, 546 (La.Ct.App.2011) (holding the omnibus clause incorporated loading a boat and preparing for departure into the statute even though they were not expressly listed). | 1 | 1 |
Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co.green2 sentences1972This was pointed out in Standard Accident Insurance Company v. Allstate Insurance Company, 72 N.J.Super. 402 , 178 A.2d 358, 364 (1962) in the following language: “Today the statutory omnibus clause is only required to be included in a policy ‘furnished as proof of financial responsibility’ * * *. 1972This was pointed out in Standard Accident Insurance Company v. Allstate Insurance Company, 72 N.J.Super. 402 , 178 A.2d 358, 364 (1962) in the following language: “Today the statutory omnibus clause is only required to be included in a policy ‘furnished as proof of financial responsibility’ * * *. | 1 | 1 |
Tuttle v. Longneckergreen2 sentences1967See also in support of our holding, although not involving an omnibus clause in a liability policy, Webb v. Moreno, 8 Cir., Iowa, 363 F.2d 97, 100, 101 , which cites Tuttle v. Longnecker, supra, 258 Iowa 393 , 138 N.W.2d 851 . 1967See also in support of our holding, although not involving an omnibus clause in a liability policy, Webb v. Moreno, 8 Cir., Iowa, 363 F.2d 97, 100, 101 , which cites Tuttle v. Longnecker, supra, 258 Iowa 393 , 138 N.W.2d 851 . | 1 | 1 |
William Henry Webb v. Helen Moreno and Fredrick Cornell Priestergreen1 sentence1967See also in support of our holding, although not involving an omnibus clause in a liability policy, Webb v. Moreno, 8 Cir., Iowa, 363 F.2d 97, 100, 101 , which cites Tuttle v. Longnecker, supra, 258 Iowa 393 , 138 N.W.2d 851 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Helwig v. ESTERLY
green
2 sentences1997In Helwig , the omnibus clause covered any person while using the automobile “provided the actual use is by the named insured or [the insured’s] spouse or with the permission of either.” Helwig, 205 Pa.Super. at 187 , 208 A.2d at 10 . 1997In Helwig , the omnibus clause covered any person while using the automobile “provided the actual use is by the named insured or [the insured’s] spouse or with the permission of either.” Helwig, 205 Pa.Super. at 187 , 208 A.2d at 10 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Irvin v. United States
green
1 sentence1977Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Ziarno, 2d Cir., 273 F.2d 645 ; Irvin v. United States, S.D., 148 F.Supp. 25 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Government Employees Insurance Co. v. James A. Ziarno, Edward T. Chamberlain and American Fidelity Fire Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence1977Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Ziarno, 2d Cir., 273 F.2d 645 ; Irvin v. United States, S.D., 148 F.Supp. 25 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Keller v. Dodds
green
2 sentences1940As sustaining this contention, appellant cites such cases as Keller v. Dodds, 224 Iowa 935 , 277 N.W. 467 ; Holub v. Fitzgerald, 214 Iowa 857 , 243 N. W. 575 ; and others in which we have condemned instructions which permitted consideration of negligence not plead. 1940As sustaining this contention, appellant cites such cases as Keller v. Dodds, 224 Iowa 935 , 277 N.W. 467 ; Holub v. Fitzgerald, 214 Iowa 857 , 243 N. W. 575 ; and others in which we have condemned instructions which permitted consideration of negligence not plead. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Holub v. Fitzgerald
green
2 sentences1940As sustaining this contention, appellant cites such cases as Keller v. Dodds, 224 Iowa 935 , 277 N.W. 467 ; Holub v. Fitzgerald, 214 Iowa 857 , 243 N. W. 575 ; and others in which we have condemned instructions which permitted consideration of negligence not plead. 1940As sustaining this contention, appellant cites such cases as Keller v. Dodds, 224 Iowa 935 , 277 N.W. 467 ; Holub v. Fitzgerald, 214 Iowa 857 , 243 N. W. 575 ; and others in which we have condemned instructions which permitted consideration of negligence not plead. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Whiteley
neutral
2 sentences1939Plaintiff, therefore, showed no cause of action against the defendant herein, and. the, district court rightfully directed the verdict in favor of the defendant.” Without doubt there have been innumerable motor vehicles sold and financed on conditional sales contracts, leases, ‘‘trust receipts” (General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Whiteley, 217 Iowa 998 , 252 N. W. 779 , supra), “trade acceptances” (Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Anderson, 190 Iowa 439 , 180 N. W. 273 , supra), and similar writings. 1939Plaintiff, therefore, showed no cause of action against the defendant herein, and. the, district court rightfully directed the verdict in favor of the defendant.” Without doubt there have been innumerable motor vehicles sold and financed on conditional sales contracts, leases, ‘‘trust receipts” (General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Whiteley, 217 Iowa 998 , 252 N. W. 779 , supra), “trade acceptances” (Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Anderson, 190 Iowa 439 , 180 N. W. 273 , supra), and similar writings. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Anderson
neutral
1 sentence1939Plaintiff, therefore, showed no cause of action against the defendant herein, and. the, district court rightfully directed the verdict in favor of the defendant.” Without doubt there have been innumerable motor vehicles sold and financed on conditional sales contracts, leases, ‘‘trust receipts” (General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Whiteley, 217 Iowa 998 , 252 N. W. 779 , supra), “trade acceptances” (Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Anderson, 190 Iowa 439 , 180 N. W. 273 , supra), and similar writings. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Davidson v. Hawkeye Ins
green
1 sentence1925Co., 71 Iowa 532 , suit was based on an insurance policy which provided that the policy should be void in case the assured conveyed or incumbered the property, without the written consent of the company. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.